Chromosome 8 gain drives cancer progression by hijacking the translation factor 4E-BP1 sensitizing for targeted CDK4/6 inhibition

To refine patient care in the context of precision oncology, it is increasingly important to understand mechanisms underlying inter-individual tumor heterogeneity, especially in oligomutated cancers. Ewing sarcoma (EwS) is genetically characterized by pathognomonic FET::ETS gene fusions (in most cases EWSR1::FLI1) while featuring a general paucity of other recurrent somatic alterations that might account for observed diversity in clinical patient outcome. Following FET::ETS fusions, chromosome (chr) 8 gain is the second most common recurrent somatic alteration in EwS. However, its pathophysiological role and potential clinical implications remain unclear. Here, we report that gene expression signatures indicative for chr8 gain are significantly associated with poor overall survival of EwS patients, and that this effect is predominantly mediated by expression of the translation initiation factor binding protein EIF4EBP1 (4E-BP1). High EIF4EBP1 expression shows the strongest association with poor overall survival of EwS patients among all genes located on chr8, which as well holds true in a subgroup analysis of patients with localized disease, emphasizing the prognostic role of 4E-BP1 in EwS. Consistently, chr8 gain was associated with higher intra-tumoral EIF4EBP1 expression in EwS patient samples. RNA interference-mediated knockdown of 4E-BP1 significantly decreased proliferation, clonogenicity, and spheroidal growth of EwS cells in vitro as well as tumor growth of EwS xenografts in vivo. To identify potential mechanisms via which 4E-BP1 mediates its phenotypic effect, we performed integrated proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of EwS cell lines with and without silencing of 4E-BP1 revealing that 4E-BP1 guides a multifunctional proteomic network including hubs associated with RNA processing, translational regulation, and chromatin modification. Collectively, we establish a significant association between chr8 gain and unfavorable prognosis in EwS. We show that this association primarily depends on the expression of the translation initiation factor binding protein 4E-BP1 regulating a multifunctional proteomic network. Our data suggest that cytogenetic testing for chr8 gain in EwS tumors may help to improve risk-stratification of patients and adaptation of the therapeutic management.

[1]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  4EBP1/2 support tumorigenicity and cell survival during energetic stress by translationally regulating fatty acid synthesis , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (EIF4EBP1) expression in glioblastoma is driven by ETS1- and MYBL2-dependent transcriptional activation , 2022, Cell death discovery.

[3]  Narasimhan P. Agaram,et al.  Clinical sequencing of soft tissue and bone sarcomas delineates diverse genomic landscapes and potential therapeutic targets , 2021, Nature Communications.

[4]  G. Wagner,et al.  Deep computational analysis details dysregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation complex eIF4F in human cancers. , 2021, Cell systems.

[5]  M. Gymrek,et al.  Systematic multi-omics cell line profiling uncovers principles of Ewing sarcoma fusion oncogene-mediated gene regulation , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  K. Stegmaier,et al.  RAD21 is a driver of chromosome 8 gain in Ewing sarcoma to mitigate replication stress , 2021, Genes & development.

[7]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Sarcoma classification by DNA methylation profiling , 2021, Nature Communications.

[8]  L. Romero-Pérez,et al.  Western Blot Analysis in Ewing Sarcoma. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  F. Cidre-Aranaz,et al.  Tumor Growth Analysis of Ewing Sarcoma Cell Lines Using Subcutaneous Xenografts in Mice. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[10]  J. Musa,et al.  Proliferation Assessment by Trypan Blue Exclusion in Ewing Sarcoma. , 2020, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  K. Goss,et al.  The translational repressor 4E-BP1regulates RRM2 levels and functions as a tumor suppressor in Ewing Sarcoma Tumors , 2020, Oncogene.

[12]  Jennifer L. Hadley,et al.  Germline Elongator mutations in Sonic Hedgehog medulloblastoma , 2020, Nature.

[13]  T. G. Grünewald,et al.  Interaction between somatic mutations and germline variants contributes to clinical heterogeneity in cancer , 2019, Molecular & cellular oncology.

[14]  Gennady Korotkevich,et al.  Fast gene set enrichment analysis , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  F. Westermann,et al.  Cooperation of cancer drivers with regulatory germline variants shapes clinical outcomes , 2019, Nature Communications.

[16]  U. Dirksen,et al.  Gene expression and immunohistochemical analyses identify SOX2 as major risk factor for overall survival and relapse in Ewing sarcoma patients , 2019, EBioMedicine.

[17]  Eun Woo Son,et al.  iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data , 2018, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  K. Strauch,et al.  Abstract A13: Genome-wide association study identifies multiple new loci associated with Ewing sarcoma susceptibility , 2018, Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts.

[19]  D. Sabatini,et al.  mTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease , 2017, Cell.

[20]  L. Medeiros,et al.  Clinical significance of trisomy 8 that emerges during therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2016, Blood Cancer Journal.

[21]  B. Rotblat,et al.  Eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1): a master regulator of mRNA translation involved in tumorigenesis , 2016, Oncogene.

[22]  S. Chanock,et al.  Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[23]  J. Cortes,et al.  Impact of trisomy 8 on treatment response and survival of patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors , 2015, Leukemia.

[24]  Matthew E. Ritchie,et al.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Li Ding,et al.  Genomic landscape of Ewing sarcoma defines an aggressive subtype with co-association of STAG2 and TP53 mutations. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[26]  A. McKenna,et al.  The genomic landscape of pediatric Ewing sarcoma. , 2014, Cancer discovery.

[27]  Jun S. Wei,et al.  The Genomic Landscape of the Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors Reveals Recurrent STAG2 Mutation , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[28]  G. Getz,et al.  Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data , 2013, Nature Communications.

[29]  Levi A Garraway,et al.  Precision oncology: an overview. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Justin Guinney,et al.  GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-Seq data , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[32]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[33]  E. Álava,et al.  1q gain and CDT2 overexpression underlie an aggressive and highly proliferative form of Ewing sarcoma , 2012, Oncogene.

[34]  F. Clavel-Chapelon,et al.  Common variants near TARDBP and EGR2 are associated with susceptibility to Ewing sarcoma , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[35]  S. Knuutila,et al.  High Expression of Complement Component 5 (C5) at Tumor Site Associates with Superior Survival in Ewing's Sarcoma Family of Tumour Patients , 2011, ISRN oncology.

[36]  Aldo Solari,et al.  PREDA: an R-package to identify regional variations in genomic data , 2011, Bioinform..

[37]  Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp,et al.  deFuse: An Algorithm for Gene Fusion Discovery in Tumor RNA-Seq Data , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Kevin B. Jones,et al.  Copy Number Alterations and Methylation in Ewing's Sarcoma , 2011, Sarcoma.

[39]  Ben S. Wittner,et al.  Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1 , 2009, Nature.

[40]  Mirko Francesconi,et al.  Overcoming resistance to conventional drugs in Ewing sarcoma and identification of molecular predictors of outcome. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  J. D. Benson,et al.  Single-vector inducible lentiviral RNAi system for oncology target validation , 2009, Cell cycle.

[42]  J. Cigudosa,et al.  Array CGH and gene-expression profiling reveals distinct genomic instability patterns associated with DNA repair and cell-cycle checkpoint pathways in Ewing's sarcoma , 2008, Oncogene.

[43]  M. Shago,et al.  Characterization of trisomy 8 in pediatric undifferentiated sarcomas using advanced molecular cytogenetic techniques. , 2007, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[44]  Pablo Tamayo,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  H. Gundacker,et al.  Impact of trisomy 8 (+8) on clinical presentation, treatment response, and survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group study. , 2002, Blood.

[46]  S. Knuutila,et al.  Prognostic impact of chromosomal aberrations in Ewing tumours , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[47]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[48]  W. Winkelmann,et al.  Genetic imbalances revealed by comparative genomic hybridization in Ewing tumors , 2001, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[49]  O. Delattre,et al.  CGH analysis of secondary genetic changes in Ewing tumors: correlation with metastatic disease in a series of 43 cases. , 2001, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[50]  S. Knuutila,et al.  Clinical correlations of genetic changes by comparative genomic hybridization in Ewing sarcoma and related tumors. , 1999, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[51]  F. Mertens,et al.  Cytogenetic aberrations in Ewing sarcoma: are secondary changes associated with clinical outcome? , 1999, Medical and pediatric oncology.

[52]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Frequency and implications of chromosome 8 and 12 gains in Ewing sarcoma. , 1998, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[53]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Translocation t(12;22)(q13;q12.2–12.3) in a clear cell sarcoma of tendons and aponeuroses , 1993, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[54]  S. Leong,et al.  Trisomy 8 as a nonrandom secondary change in myxoid liposarcoma. , 1991, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[55]  A. Aurias,et al.  Chromosomes in Ewing's sarcoma. II. Nonrandom additional changes, trisomy 8 and der(16)t(1;16). , 1988, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[56]  Stefan M. Pfister,et al.  Routine RNA sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens in neuropathology diagnostics identifies diagnostically and therapeutically relevant gene fusions , 2019, Acta Neuropathologica.

[57]  Jerad M. Gardner,et al.  Ewing sarcoma. , 2014, Seminars in diagnostic pathology.

[58]  Cheng Li,et al.  Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. , 2007, Biostatistics.

[59]  O. Myklebost,et al.  Recurrent gains of 1q, 8 and 12 in the Ewing family of tumours by comparative genomic hybridization. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.