nab-Paclitaxel–Based Therapy in Underserved Patient Populations: The ABOUND.PS2 Study in Patients With NSCLC and a Performance Status of 2

Introduction The phase II ABOUND.PS2 study (NCT02289456) assessed safety/tolerability of a first-line modified nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin regimen for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 2. Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS 2 received four cycles of nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus carboplatin area under the curve 5 day 1 q3w (induction). Patients without progression received nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (100 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 q3w) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint: percentage of patients discontinuing induction due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results 11/40 treated patients (27.5%; 95% CI, 14.60–43.89) discontinued chemotherapy induction due to TEAEs; 16/40 (40.0%) continued nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Median progression-free and overall survival were 4.4 (95% CI, 2.99–7.00) and 7.7 (95% CI, 4.93–13.17) months. Grade 3/4 TEAEs during induction included neutropenia (22.5%), anemia (17.5%), thrombocytopenia (5.0%), and peripheral neuropathy (2.5%). Conclusion This nab-paclitaxel–based regimen was tolerable in patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS 2, with efficacy comparable to historical chemotherapy data.

[1]  T. Mok,et al.  Pembrolizumab (pembro) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1%: Open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-042 study. , 2018, Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  N. Blais,et al.  Factors influencing treatment selection and survival in advanced lung cancer. , 2017, Current oncology.

[3]  T. Mok,et al.  481TiPPembrolizumab (MK-3475) versus platinum-based chemotherapy for PD-L1+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-042 study , 2015 .

[4]  P. Jänne,et al.  A Phase II Study of Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Thoracic Radiotherapy and Erlotinib in Poor-Risk Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results of CALGB 30605 (Alliance)/RTOG 0972 (NRG) , 2015, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[5]  A. Jatoi,et al.  Non–small-cell lung cancer in elderly patients: a discussion of treatment options. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  H. West Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and marginal performance status: walking the tight rope towards improved survival. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  C. Gridelli,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: the CAPPA-2 study. , 2013, Lung cancer.

[8]  C. Barrios,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of single-agent pemetrexed versus carboplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Socinski,et al.  Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Saito,et al.  Performance Status and Smoking Status Are Independent Favorable Prognostic Factors for Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of 26,957 Patients with NSCLC , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[11]  A. Spira,et al.  Phase II Trial of Nanoparticle Albumin-Bound Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Bevacizumab in First-line Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[12]  M. Socinski,et al.  Phase III Trial Comparing Paclitaxel Poliglumex (CT-2103, PPX) in Combination with Carboplatin Versus Standard Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in the Treatment of PS 2 Patients with Chemotherapy-Naïve Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[13]  A. Dowlati,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of erlotinib or standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  J. Cashy,et al.  Prevalence of Poor Performance Status in Lung Cancer Patients: Implications for Research , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[15]  David H. Johnson,et al.  Randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 non-small-cell lung cancer patients: ECOG 1599. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine–Carboplatin for Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and a Performance Status of 2: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[17]  David Harrington,et al.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Krook,et al.  Outcome of patients with a performance status of 2 in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1594 , 2001, Cancer.

[19]  M. Tamburini,et al.  Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective, longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution. , 1996, European journal of cancer.

[20]  L. Chisholm,et al.  Implications of Research , 1983, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  Matthew P. Goetz,et al.  NCCN CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES IN ONCOLOGY , 2019 .

[22]  Liquid Biopsies Non-small-cell lung cancer , 2015, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[23]  J. Holland,et al.  Single-agent versus combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the cancer and leukemia group B (study 9730). , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.