“Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content

As the scourge of “fake news” continues to plague our information environment, attention has turned toward devising automated solutions for detecting problematic online content. But, in order to build reliable algorithms for flagging “fake news,” we will need to go beyond broad definitions of the concept and identify distinguishing features that are specific enough for machine learning. With this objective in mind, we conducted an explication of “fake news” that, as a concept, has ballooned to include more than simply false information, with partisans weaponizing it to cast aspersions on the veracity of claims made by those who are politically opposed to them. We identify seven different types of online content under the label of “fake news” (false news, polarized content, satire, misreporting, commentary, persuasive information, and citizen journalism) and contrast them with “real news” by introducing a taxonomy of operational indicators in four domains—message, source, structure, and network—that together can help disambiguate the nature of online news content.

[1]  Yimin Chen,et al.  Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news , 2015, ASIST.

[2]  C. Jack Lexicon of lies: terms for problematic information , 2017 .

[3]  Ivan B. Dylko,et al.  The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  C. Nass,et al.  Conceptualizing Sources in Online News , 2001 .

[5]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[6]  M. Crocco,et al.  Teaching with evidence , 2017 .

[7]  C. Sunstein The Law of Group Polarization , 1999, How Change Happens.

[8]  James H. Fetzer Disinformation: The Use of False Information , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[9]  Hal Berghel,et al.  Alt-News and Post-Truths in the "Fake News" Era , 2017, Computer.

[10]  Meital Balmas,et al.  When Fake News Becomes Real , 2014, Commun. Res..

[11]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[12]  Sotiris B. Kotsiantis,et al.  Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques , 2007, Informatica.

[13]  Brian McNair What is journalism , 2005 .

[14]  Manny Cohen Fake news and manipulated data, the new GDPR, and the future of information , 2017 .

[15]  Silvio Waisbord,et al.  Truth is What Happens to News , 2018, Journalism Studies.

[16]  X. Drèze,et al.  Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? , 2003 .

[17]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking , 2017, Journal of personality.

[18]  Huan Liu,et al.  Deep Headline Generation for Clickbait Detection , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[19]  Alekseĭ Grigorʹevich Ivakhnenko,et al.  CYBERNETIC PREDICTING DEVICES , 1966 .

[20]  P. Sol Hart,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Science Communication , 2012, Commun. Res..

[21]  B. Nyhan,et al.  When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions , 2010 .

[22]  H. Roberts,et al.  Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics , 2018 .

[23]  Patrick R. Rich,et al.  The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  M. Gentzkow,et al.  Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election , 2017 .

[25]  Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia,et al.  The spread of low-credibility content by social bots , 2017, Nature Communications.

[26]  Sinan Aral,et al.  The spread of true and false news online , 2018, Science.

[27]  Matt Carlson When news sites go native: Redefining the advertising–editorial divide in response to native advertising , 2015 .

[28]  Benno Stein,et al.  A Stylometric Inquiry into Hyperpartisan and Fake News , 2017, ACL.

[29]  Rasmus Kleis Nielsen,et al.  "News you don't believe": Audience perspectives on fake news , 2017 .

[30]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[31]  J. Sim,et al.  Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization , 2017, Quality & Quantity.

[32]  M. E. Maron,et al.  Automatic Indexing: An Experimental Inquiry , 1961, JACM.

[33]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[34]  Lawrence D. Jackel,et al.  Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition , 1989, Neural Computation.

[35]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think , 2012 .

[36]  Paul E. Smaldino,et al.  Replication, Communication, and the Population Dynamics of Scientific Discovery , 2015, PloS one.

[37]  J. M. Berger The Methodology of the Hamilton 68 Dashboard , 2017 .

[38]  Geoffrey Baym,et al.  The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism , 2005 .

[39]  P. Shoemaker News Values: Reciprocal Effects on Journalists and Journalism , 2017 .

[40]  Fabio Giglietto,et al.  Fakes, News and the Election: A New Taxonomy for the Study of Misleading Information within the Hybrid Media System , 2016 .

[41]  Sandra L. Borden,et al.  The Role of Journalist and the Performance of Journalism: Ethical Lessons From “Fake” News (Seriously) , 2007 .

[42]  Sam Wineburg,et al.  Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning , 2016 .

[43]  P. Mihailidis,et al.  Spreadable Spectacle in Digital Culture: Civic Expression, Fake News, and the Role of Media Literacies in “Post-Fact” Society , 2017 .

[44]  R. Frank Caveat Lector: Fake News as Folklore , 2015 .

[45]  William Yang Wang “Liar, Liar Pants on Fire”: A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection , 2017, ACL.

[46]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[47]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The science of fake news , 2018, Science.

[48]  M. McCombs A Look at Agenda-setting: past, present and future , 2005 .

[49]  I. Reilly Satirical Fake News and/as American Political Discourse , 2012 .

[50]  Philip N. Howard,et al.  Social Media, News and Political Information during the US Election: Was Polarizing Content Concentrated in Swing States? , 2018, ArXiv.

[51]  S. van der Linden,et al.  The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation , 2019 .

[52]  Emily A. Thorson,et al.  The persistence and peril of misinformation: Defining what truth means and deciphering how human brains verify information are some of the challenges to battling widespread falsehoods , 2017 .

[53]  Ward E. Jones Dissident versus Loyalist: Which Scientists Should We Trust? , 2002 .

[54]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media , 2015 .

[55]  D. Trilling,et al.  From Newsworthiness to Shareworthiness , 2017 .

[56]  Galit Avneri,et al.  Style-based Text Categorization: What Newspaper Am I Reading? , 1998 .

[57]  Yu-Leung Ng,et al.  The Human Alarm System for Sensational News, Online News Headlines, and Associated Generic Digital Footprints: A Uses and Gratifications Approach , 2018, Communication Research.

[58]  David O. Klein,et al.  Fake News: A Legal Perspective , 2017 .

[59]  I. Reilly From Critique to Mobilization: The Yes Men and the Utopian Politics of Satirical Fake News , 2013 .

[60]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Defining “Fake News” , 2018 .