Technoeconomic Analysis of a Hybrid Biomass Thermochemical and Electrochemical Conversion System

This study explores an integrated biomass conversion system based on a common fast pyrolysis step and two subsequent bio-oil upgrading pathways. The two options are bio-oil thermochemical upgrading to drop-in transportation biofuels through hydrotreating and hydrocracking, and bio-oil electrochemical conversion for electrical power generation using a direct bio-oil fuel cell method. The technoeconomic performances of biomass-to-biofuels and biomass-to-electricity pathways are first examined individually, and then integrated for the analysis of a hybrid biomass conversion system. A biomass facility of 2000 tonnes per day is investigated as a baseline. The minimum fuel-selling price (MFSP) is estimated to be $ 2.48 per gallon, with biomass feedstock and other operating costs as major contributors. A very high minimum electricity-selling price (MESP) of $ 5.36 per kWh is projected based on the current laboratory-scale fuel cell configuration. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the effective reactant content in bio-oil, the degree of oxidation, and the fuel cell system efficiency play key roles in the MESP. The estimate can be reduced to $ 0.96 per kWh if target values of the three parameters are met. The results of the hybrid system suggest that the MESP can be reduced substantially from $ 0.96 to $ 0 per kWh when the hybrid system increases the bio-oil fraction for biofuel production from 0 to 75.8 %, given a biofuel MFSP of $ 3 per gallon.

[1]  P. Jansens,et al.  Biomass combustion in fluidized bed boilers: Potential problems and remedies , 2009 .

[2]  B. Shanks,et al.  Detailed characterization of red oak-derived pyrolysis oil: Integrated use of GC, HPLC, IC, GPC and Karl-Fischer , 2014 .

[3]  Wenzheng Li,et al.  Electrocatalytic selective oxidation of glycerol to tartronate on Au/C anode catalysts in anion exchange membrane fuel cells with electricity cogeneration , 2014 .

[4]  Wenzheng Li,et al.  Supported Pt, Pd and Au nanoparticle anode catalysts for anion-exchange membrane fuel cells with glycerol and crude glycerol fuels , 2013 .

[5]  Paul J. A. Kenis,et al.  Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities , 2013 .

[6]  M. P. Morales,et al.  Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers , 2013 .

[7]  Mobolaji Shemfe,et al.  Techno-economic performance analysis of biofuel production and miniature electric power generation from biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading , 2015 .

[8]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  Cost Analysis of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Stacks for Mass Production , 2016 .

[9]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways , 2010 .

[10]  K. Sun,et al.  Selective electro-oxidation of glycerol to tartronate or mesoxalate on Au nanoparticle catalyst via electrode potential tuning in anion-exchange membrane electro-catalytic flow reactor , 2014 .

[11]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Techno-Economic Analysis of the Stabilization of Bio-Oil Fractions for Insertion into Petroleum Refineries , 2017 .

[12]  T. Zhao,et al.  Alkaline direct oxidation fuel cell with non-platinum catalysts capable of converting glucose to electricity at high power output , 2011 .

[13]  B. Jenkins A comment on the optimal sizing of a biomass utilization facility under constant and variable cost scaling , 1997 .

[14]  Wenzheng Li,et al.  Direct fast pyrolysis bio-oil fuel cell , 2016 .

[15]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries , 2007 .

[16]  Robert C. Brown,et al.  Economics of biofuels and bioproducts from an integrated pyrolysis biorefinery , 2016 .

[17]  J. E. Jackson,et al.  Towards sustainable hydrocarbon fuels with biomass fast pyrolysis oil and electrocatalytic upgrading , 2017 .

[18]  Dennis J. Miller,et al.  A mild approach for bio-oil stabilization and upgrading: electrocatalytic hydrogenation using ruthenium supported on activated carbon cloth , 2014 .

[19]  Qi Dang,et al.  Comparative techno-economic analysis of advanced biofuels, biochemicals, and hydrocarbon chemicals via the fast pyrolysis platform , 2016 .

[20]  S. Basu,et al.  A study on direct glucose and fructose alkaline fuel cell , 2010 .

[21]  Qi Dang,et al.  Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Kevin G. Gallagher,et al.  Pathways to Low Cost Electrochemical Energy Storage: A Comparison of Aqueous and Nonaqueous Flow Batteries , 2014 .

[23]  Caisheng Wang,et al.  Unit sizing and cost analysis of stand-alone hybrid wind/PV/fuel cell power generation systems , 2006 .

[24]  K. Yasuda,et al.  Nonenzymatic glucose fuel cells with an anion exchange membrane as an electrolyte , 2009 .

[25]  David Chiaramonti,et al.  Power generation using fast pyrolysis liquids from biomass , 2007 .

[26]  D. Mohan,et al.  Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review , 2006 .

[27]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  Recent developments in fast pyrolysis of ligno-cellulosic materials. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  Osamu Kobayashi,et al.  Mass production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve , 2004 .