Risk Evaluation in Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on Dempster-Shafer Theory and Prospect Theory ⋆

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), as a very important safety and reliability analysis tool, has been extensively used for examining potential failures in products, processes, designs and services. In traditional FMEA, potential failure modes are determined and can be evaluated by Risk Priority Number (RPN), which is defined as the multiplication of the occurrence (O), severity (S), and detection (D). However, the traditional RPN has been criticized because of several deficiencies due to the uncertainty in FMEA. In this paper, a new risk evaluation method in FMEA based on Dempster-Shafer theory (D-S theory) and prospect theory is proposed to the Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) problem. D-S theory is used to express the fuzzy assessment information which may be imprecise and uncertain. Then, the fuzzy group assessment is transformed into a crisp value. Prospect theory is applied on risk evaluation and risk prioritizing. A numerical example is illustrated and shows the efficiency of the proposed method.

[1]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Fuzzy Dijkstra algorithm for shortest path problem under uncertain environment , 2012, Appl. Soft Comput..

[2]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Jonathan D. Linton,et al.  Facing the challenges of service automation: an enabler for e-commerce and productivity gain in traditional services , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[4]  Nune Ravi Sankar,et al.  Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis , 2001 .

[5]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  Identifying influential nodes in weighted networks based on evidence theory , 2013 .

[6]  Shun-Peng Zhu,et al.  Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty , 2011 .

[7]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Evidential cognitive maps , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[8]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH INTEGRATING 2-TUPLE AND LOWGA OPERATORS IN PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[9]  Jin Wang,et al.  Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning , 2003, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Yong Deng,et al.  Modeling contaminant intrusion in water distribution networks: A new similarity-based DST method , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Systematic failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modelling , 2005 .

[12]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[15]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[16]  Hu-Chen Liu,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk analysis in a linguistic environment: A fuzzy evidential reasoning-based approach , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..