Careers in translational clinical research-historical perspectives, future challenges.

ARECENT SURVEY REVEALS THAT ONLY ABOUT 11% OF medical school graduates plan careers that are exclusively or significantly devoted to research. This small but vital group of nearly 1600 graduates each year holds the future of medicine in its hands. Some are badly needed to replenish the ranks of patient-oriented translational clinical researchers, who apply findings derived in basic science to the development of new understanding of disease mechanisms, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Herein I propose several improved approaches to the recruitment and retention of patient-oriented translational clinical researchers. The task is not simple because ample evidence indicates that the professional career pathways of all classes of clinical researchers have been uncertain and seriously troubled. In fact, clinical researchers are considered such an “endangered species” that many leaders of training programs across the United States have expressed serious doubts about whether such careers will be viable in the future. Before proposing a new approach to career development for patient-oriented translational clinical investigators, it is important to review the short history of the field and recent efforts to improve the morale of its researchers. Important policy improvements have been made in recent years, and the total impact of these changes is not yet fully apparent. But I believe that more fundamental changes must be made now to encourage this important group of medical scientists to continue their efforts to learn biology from patients and to apply basic medical science for their benefit.

[1]  V. Bush Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[2]  D. Nathan Educational-debt relief for clinical investigators--a vote of confidence. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  T. Ley,et al.  Removing career obstacles for young physician-scientists -- loan-repayment programs. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  D. Nathan,et al.  Comprehensive Cancer Centres and the war on cancer , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  H. Varmus,et al.  The National Institutes of Health and clinical research: a progress report , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[6]  Mario Biagioli,et al.  Rights or Rewards? Changing Contexts and Definitions of Scientific Authorship. , 2000 .

[7]  D. Nathan Clinical Research: Perceptions, Reality, and Proposed Solutions , 1998 .

[8]  P. Carbone,et al.  Funding for patient-oriented research. Critical strain on a fundamental linchpin. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  P. Griner,et al.  Relationship between National Institutes of Health research awards to US medical schools and managed care market penetration. , 1997, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[10]  K. Shine Some imperatives for clinical research. , 1997, JAMA.

[11]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Preventing the extinction of the clinical research ecosystem. , 1997, JAMA.

[12]  R. Schrier Ensuring the survival of the clinician‐scientist , 1997, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[13]  M. Brown,et al.  The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered--but still beloved. , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[14]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Academic health centers in a changing environment. , 1996, Health affairs.

[15]  L. Shulman Clinical research 1996: stirrings from the academic health centers , 1996, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[16]  B. Culliton Clinical investigation: An endangered science , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[17]  M. Randolph,et al.  Careers in Clinical Research: Obstacles and Opportunities , 1995 .

[18]  E. H. Ahrens The Crisis in Clinical Research: Overcoming Institutional Obstacles , 1992 .

[19]  J. Wyngaarden The clinical investigator as an endangered species. , 1981, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[20]  J. Shannon Federal support of biomedical sciences: development and academic impact. , 1976, Journal of medical education.

[21]  J. Shannon The advancement of medical research: a twenty-year view of the role of the National Institutes of Health. , 1967, Journal of medical education.

[22]  D. C. Swain The rise of a research empire: NIH, 1930 to 1950. , 1962, Science.