Academic Performance of Students with the Highest and Mediocre School-leaving Grades: Does the Aptitude Test for Medical Studies (TMS) Balance Their Prognoses?

Background: Admission to undergraduate medical training in Germany occurs by central and local pathways. Central admission includes two distinct groups: Students with top school-leaving grades (best-SLG group) and students with inferior school-leaving grades who are admitted with a delay of up to seven years (delayed admission group). Students with academic difficulties and early dropouts are present in both groups. Local admission at our university involves the German Test for Medical Studies (TMS) and allows the admission by merit of students with a wide range of school-leaving grades. Aims: To examine the justification of a TMS-based strategy to reduce the admission of potentially weak best school-leavers and enhance the admission of potentially able candidates with mediocre school-leaving grades. Method: The prognostic contribution of the school-leaving (SL) GPA and the TMS to academic performance and to continuity in the pre-clinical part of the undergraduate medical program was examined in two study groups: best school leavers (SL grade 1.0, SL-GPA 823-900 points) and mediocre school leavers (SL grades 2.0-2.3, SL-GPA 689-660 points). The outcomes in both groups were compared in relation to their TMS results. The prospective study included four consecutive cohorts. Results: In each study group the TMS predicted the academic performance (β=0.442-0.446) and the continuity of studies (OR=0.890-0.853) better than the SL-GPA (β=0.238-0.047; OR=1.009-0.998). Attrition was most strongly associated with failing to take the TMS (OR=0.230-0.380). Mediocre school leavers with TMS scores ≥125 performed as well as the best school leavers. Mediocre school leavers with TMS scores between 110-124 performed on average less well but within the required standards. Best school leavers with mediocre TMS scores and 30% of the best school leavers who hadn't taken the TMS performed less well than most mediocre school leavers with high TMS scores. Discussion: The TMS appears to differentiate between potentially successful and less successful students in both GPA categories. Mediocre school leavers (SLG 2.0-2.3) with exceptionally high TMS results reach better pre-clinical examination results than best school leavers (SLG 1.0) with mediocre TMS results. Thus, the present data justify the use of the TMS to facilitate the participation of mediocre school leavers in the competition for admission slots.

[1]  F. Resch,et al.  Predictive Value of the School-leaving Grade and Prognosis of Different Admission Groups for Academic Performance and Continuity in the Medical Course – a Longitudinal Study , 2014, GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung.

[2]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Comparison of the sensitivity of the UKCAT and A Levels to sociodemographic characteristics: a national study , 2014, BMC medical education.

[3]  Tim Friedman,et al.  Same admissions tools, different outcomes: a critical perspective on predictive validity in three undergraduate medical schools , 2013, BMC medical education.

[4]  C. Lamina,et al.  Paradise lost or paradise regained? Changes in admission system affect academic performance and drop-out rates of medical students , 2013, Medical teacher.

[5]  S. Sehner,et al.  Suitability of the HAM-Nat test and TMS module "basic medical-scientific understanding" for medical school selection , 2012, GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung.

[6]  Aidan Byrne,et al.  Graduate Entry Medicine: Selection Criteria and Student Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[7]  J. Dowell,et al.  Predictive validity of the personal qualities assessment for selection of medical students in Scotland , 2011, Medical teacher.

[8]  J. Smolle,et al.  Dropout Rates in Medical Students at One School Before and After the Installation of Admission Tests in Austria , 2011, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  I. Matot,et al.  The effect of integration of non-cognitive parameters on medical students' characteristics and their intended career choices. , 2011, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[10]  M. Kadmon,et al.  Integrative vs. Traditional Learning from the Student Perspective , 2011, GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung.

[11]  J. Emery,et al.  The BioMedical Admissions Test for medical student selection: Issues of fairness and bias , 2011, Medical Teacher.

[12]  J. Smolle,et al.  Progress of medical students after open admission or admission based on knowledge tests , 2010, Medical Education.

[13]  Shonna D. Waters,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and the Relationship Between the SAT and Freshman GPA: An Analysis of Data from 41 Colleges and Universities , 2009 .

[14]  G. Norman,et al.  Predictive validity of the multiple mini‐interview for selecting medical trainees , 2009, Medical education.

[15]  J. Emery,et al.  The predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test for pre‐clinical examination performance , 2009, Medical education.

[16]  D. Powis,et al.  A comprehensive model for the selection of medical students , 2009, Medical teacher.

[17]  S. Harendza,et al.  Reduzierbarkeit der Abbrecherquote im Humanmedizinstudium durch das Hamburger Auswahlverfahren für Medizinische Studiengänge - Naturwissenschaftsteil (HAM-Nat) [Possible reduction of the medical school dropout number by the Hamburg Assessment test for Medicine - part Natural sciences (HAM-Nat)] , 2008 .

[18]  R. Lilford,et al.  Selecting medical students Tests of cognitive ability are probably the best method at present , 2008 .

[19]  E. Ferguson,et al.  Demographic and socio‐economic associations with academic attainment (UCAS tariff scores) in applicants to medical school , 2007, Medical education.

[20]  Claudio Violato,et al.  The Predictive Validity of the MCAT for Medical School Performance and Medical Board Licensing Examinations: A Meta-Analysis of the Published Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  Benedikt Hell,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between the Big Five and Academic Success at University , 2007 .

[22]  C. Cliffordson.  Selection Effects on Applications and Admissions to Medical Education with Regular and Step‐Wise Admission Procedures , 2006 .

[23]  L. Åberg-Bengtsson.  Separating Quantitative and Analytic Dimensions in the Swedish Scholastic Aptitude Test (SweSAT) , 2005 .

[24]  Miles Bore,et al.  Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school , 2005, Medical education.

[25]  J. Searle,et al.  Assessing suitability for a problem‐based learning curriculum: evaluating a new student selection instrument , 2005, Medical education.

[26]  W. McGaghie.  Assessing readiness for medical education: evolution of the medical college admission test. , 2002, JAMA.

[27]  C. Borst.  Choosing the Student Body: Masculinity, Culture, and the Crisis of Medical School Admissions, 1920–1950 , 2002, History of Education Quarterly.

[28]  E. Ferguson,et al.  Learning in practice Factors associated with success in medical school: systematic review of the literature , 2022 .

[29]  D. Streiner,et al.  Characteristics of first-year students in Canadian medical schools. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[30]  P. Salvatori.  Reliability and Validity of Admissions Tools Used to Select Students for the Health Professions , 2001, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[31]  E. Klieme,et al.  The Relationship between Different Criteria for Admission to Medical School and Student Success , 1998 .

[32]  A. Michell.  Student selection: time to reconsider? , 1990, The Veterinary Record.