Whole Genome Sequencing Highlights Genetic Changes Associated with Laboratory Domestication of C. elegans

Defining the mutational landscape when individuals of a species grow separately and diverge over many generations can provide insights into trait evolution. A specific example of this involves studying changes associated with domestication where different lines of the same wild stock have been cultivated independently in different standard environments. Whole genome sequence comparison of such lines permits estimation of mutation rates, inference of genes' ancestral states and ancestry of existing strains, and correction of sequencing errors in genome databases. Here we study domestication of the C. elegans Bristol strain as a model, and report the genome sequence of LSJ1 (Bristol), a sibling of the standard C. elegans reference wild type N2 (Bristol). The LSJ1 and N2 lines were cultivated separately from shortly after the Bristol strain was isolated until methods to freeze C. elegans were developed. We find that during this time the two strains have accumulated 1208 genetic differences. We describe phenotypic variation between N2 and LSJ1 in the rate at which embryos develop, the rate of production of eggs, the maturity of eggs at laying, and feeding behavior, all the result of post-isolation changes. We infer the ancestral alleles in the original Bristol isolate and highlight 2038 likely sequencing errors in the original N2 reference genome sequence. Many of these changes modify genome annotation. Our study provides a starting point to further investigate genotype-phenotype association and offers insights into the process of selection as a result of laboratory domestication.

[1]  D. Sakhrani,et al.  Domestication and growth hormone transgenesis cause similar changes in gene expression in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  W. Nicholas,et al.  AXENIC CULTIVATION OF CAENORHARDITIS BRIGGSAE (NEMATODA: RHABDITIDAE) WITH CHEMICALLY UNDEFINED SUPPLEMENTS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES WITH RELATED NEMATODES * , 1959 .

[3]  C. Löfstedt,et al.  Genetic Variability and Robustness of Host Odor Preference in Drosophila melanogaster , 2008, Current Biology.

[4]  I. Pe’er,et al.  Caenorhabditis elegans mutant allele identification by whole-genome sequencing , 2008, Nature Methods.

[5]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform , 2010, Bioinform..

[6]  Kai Ye,et al.  Pindel: a pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads , 2009, Bioinform..

[7]  T. Mackay Mutations and quantitative genetic variation: lessons from Drosophila , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Widespread Genetic Incompatibility in C. Elegans Maintained by Balancing Selection , 2008, Science.

[9]  K. Lindblad-Toh,et al.  Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication , 2010, Nature.

[10]  Mario de Bono,et al.  Experience-Dependent Modulation of C. elegans Behavior by Ambient Oxygen , 2005, Current Biology.

[11]  W. Gish,et al.  Rapid gene mapping in Caenorhabditis elegans using a high density polymorphism map , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Andrew Smith Genome sequence of the nematode C-elegans: A platform for investigating biology , 1998 .

[13]  Cornelia I. Bargmann,et al.  Oxygen sensation and social feeding mediated by a C. elegans guanylate cyclase homologue , 2004, Nature.

[14]  M. A. van der Horst,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in wild isolates of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2000, Genome research.

[15]  J. Riksen,et al.  Mapping phenotypic plasticity and genotype–environment interactions affecting life-history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2007, Heredity.

[16]  J. Berg Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. , 1998, Science.

[17]  J. Diamond,et al.  Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication , 2002, Nature.

[18]  Richard Durbin,et al.  A large genome center's improvements to the Illumina sequencing system , 2008, Nature Methods.

[19]  Peter C. Dolan,et al.  A genome-wide view of Caenorhabditis elegans base-substitution mutation processes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Natural Variation in a Neuropeptide Y Receptor Homolog Modifies Social Behavior and Food Response in C. elegans , 1998, Cell.

[21]  Lee M. Silver,et al.  Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications , 1995 .

[22]  B. Meyerson,et al.  Exploration and risk assessment: a comparative study of male house mice (Mus musculus musculus) and two laboratory strains , 2004, Physiology & Behavior.

[23]  Evan Z. Macosko,et al.  Quantitative Mapping of a Digenic Behavioral Trait Implicates Globin Variation in C. elegans Sensory Behaviors , 2009, Neuron.

[24]  M. Félix,et al.  Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system. , 2008, Genes & development.

[25]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[26]  E. Yarwood,et al.  Differential nutritional requirements for reproduction of two strains of Caenorhabditis elegans in axenic culture. , 1960 .

[27]  Hugh M. Robertson,et al.  Neutral Evolution of Ten Types of mariner Transposons in the Genomes of Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae , 2003, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[28]  W. Wood The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , 1988 .

[29]  Jonathan Flint,et al.  Analysis of quantitative trait loci that influence animal behavior. , 2003, Journal of neurobiology.

[30]  Hans Grüneberg,et al.  The mutants of drosophila melanogaster , 1944 .

[31]  Jeremiah D. Degenhardt,et al.  Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication , 2010, Nature.

[32]  Mario de Bono,et al.  Inhibition of Caenorhabditis elegans social feeding by FMRFamide-related peptide activation of NPR-1 , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Gabor T. Marth,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing and variant discovery in C. elegans , 2008, Nature Methods.

[34]  J. Forejt,et al.  Behavioral Characterization of Wild Derived Male Mice (Mus musculus musculus) of the PWD/Ph Inbred Strain: High Exploration Compared to C57BL/6J , 2004, Behavior genetics.

[35]  Z. Ning,et al.  Amplification-free Illumina sequencing-library preparation facilitates improved mapping and assembly of GC-biased genomes , 2009, Nature Methods.

[36]  W Kelley Thomas,et al.  Phylogenetics in Caenorhabditis elegans: an analysis of divergence and outcrossing. , 2003, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  M. D. Bono,et al.  Natural variation in a neural globin tunes oxygen sensing in wild Caenorhabditis elegans , 2009, Nature.

[38]  T. Garland,et al.  Exercise physiology of wild and random-bred laboratory house mice and their reciprocal hybrids. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[39]  D. Lindsley,et al.  Genetic variations of Drosophila melanogaster , 1967 .

[40]  Mario de Bono,et al.  Behavioral Motifs and Neural Pathways Coordinating O2 Responses and Aggregation in C. elegans , 2006, Current Biology.

[41]  A. Cutter Nucleotide Polymorphism and Linkage Disequilibrium in Wild Populations of the Partial Selfer Caenorhabditis elegans , 2006, Genetics.

[42]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Recombinational Landscape and Population Genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[43]  C. Kenyon,et al.  The nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1988, Science.

[44]  C. Darwin The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication: DOMESTIC PIGEONS , 1868 .