The effects of fixed and removable implant-stabilised prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption.

This study investigated the change over time in the area of the posterior mandibular residual ridge in patients wearing either i) mandibular overdentures stabilised by two implants (Brånemark System; Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) connected by a bar, or ii) mandibular fixed cantilever prostheses stabilised on five or six implants. Proportional measurements were made in order to compare the area of the residual ridge with an area of bone uninfluenced by resorption. Measurements were made by digitising tracings of panoramic radiographs that were taken shortly after implant insertion and up to seven years later. With the use of overdentures, the posterior bone area index reduced by a mean of 1.1% per annum, while a mean bone area index increase of 1.6% per annum was demonstrated in association with fixed prostheses. A multiple linear regression model was fitted to predict the change in posterior area from type of prosthesis, gender, age, years of edentulism and initial height of the mandible. The model was only significant for initial height of mandible (P = 0.04) and type of prosthesis (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, patients rehabilitated with implant-stabilised mandibular overdentures demonstrated low rates of posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption, while patients rehabilitated with implant-stabilised mandibular fixed cantilever prostheses demonstrated bone apposition in the same area.

[1]  M. Ueda,et al.  Osseous proliferation of the mandible after placement of endosseous implants. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  R. Wilding,et al.  The use of panoramic radiographs to measure alveolar bone areas. , 1987, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[3]  M. A. van 't Hof,et al.  Differences Two Years after Tooth Extraction in Mandibular Bone Reduction in Patients Treated with Immediate Overdentures or with Immediate Complete Dentures , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[4]  I Herrmann,et al.  A multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. , 1993, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  Wright Ps,et al.  Effect of prefabricated bar design with implant-stabilized prostheses on ridge resorption: a clinical report. , 1998 .

[6]  L. Sennerby,et al.  Mandibular bone resorption in patients treated with tissue-integrated prostheses and in complete-denture wearers. , 1988, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[7]  R. M. Watson,et al.  The effects of prefabricated bar design on the success of overdentures stabilized by implants. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  L E Lanyon,et al.  The success and failure of the adaptive response to functional load-bearing in averting bone fracture. , 1992, Bone.

[9]  A Tallgren,et al.  The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Posterior jaw bone resorption in osseointegrated implant-supported overdentures. , 1992, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  P. Branemark,et al.  Introduction to osseointegration , 1985 .

[12]  M. W. Marshall,et al.  Using restorations borne totally by anterior implants to preserve the edentulous mandible. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.