Anyone for Tennis (Betting)?

Abstract The most robust anomaly noted in the literature on wagering markets is (positive) longshot bias: over a period of 50 years, it has been well documented in horse betting that higher expected returns accrue to short- than to long-odds bets. However, a few examples of betting markets with zero or negative bias have been found, for example in certain American sports. The understanding of longshot bias is likely to be informed by comparing and contrasting conditions in markets displaying positive, zero, and negative bias but, to date, relatively few markets have been examined. This paper employs a large data set on professional men's tennis matches and a new econometric approach to the estimation of the relationship between returns and odds. It finds positive bias throughout the range of odds. It discusses this finding in the context of the debate on why biases exist and persist in wagering markets, focusing particularly on bettors’ attitudes towards risk and skewness.

[1]  W. Hurley,et al.  A Note on the Hayek Hypothesis and the Favorite-Longshot Bias in Parimutuel Betting , 1995 .

[2]  Richard D. Deveaux,et al.  Applied Smoothing Techniques for Data Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[3]  Linda M. Woodland,et al.  Market Efficiency and Profitable Wagering in the National Hockey League: Can Bettors Score on Longshots? , 2001 .

[4]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Why are Gambling Markets Organized so Differently from Financial Markets? , 2004 .

[5]  Robert Simmons,et al.  Odds setters as forecasters: the case of English football , 2005 .

[6]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries , 1988 .

[7]  Judith A. Chevalier,et al.  Identifying Investor Sentiment from Price Paths: The Case of Football Betting , 1999 .

[8]  S. Shmanske.  Odds-setting efficiency in gambling markets: Evidence from the PGA TOUR , 2005 .

[9]  Leighton Vaughan Williams,et al.  Information Efficiency in Betting Markets: A Survey , 1999 .

[10]  David Law,et al.  The Favourite-Longshot Bias, Bookmaker Margins and Insider Trading in a Variety of Betting Markets , 2003 .

[11]  Bill M. Woodland,et al.  Expected utility, skewness, and the baseball betting market , 1999 .

[12]  D. Peel,et al.  The utility of gambling and the favourite-longshot bias , 2004 .

[13]  A. Bowman,et al.  Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis : the kernel approach with S-plus illustrations , 1999 .

[14]  K. Busche.  Efficient Market Results in an Asian Setting , 2008 .

[15]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Hyun Song Shin,et al.  PRICES OF STATE CONTINGENT CLAIMS WITH INSIDER TRADERS, AND THE FAVOURITE- LONGSHOT BIAS* , 1992 .

[17]  R. M. Griffith,et al.  Odds adjustments by American horse-race bettors. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  Linda M. Woodland,et al.  Market Efficiency and the Favorite‐Longshot Bias: The Baseball Betting Market , 1994 .

[19]  Joseph H. Golec,et al.  Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Robert Simmons,et al.  Outcome uncertainty and attendance demand in sport: the case of English soccer , 2002 .

[21]  Raymond D. Sauer,et al.  The Economics of Wagering Markets , 1998 .

[22]  Why are some favourite-longshot biases positive and others negative? , 1998 .

[23]  K. Busche,et al.  An Exception to the Risk Preference Anomaly , 1988 .

[24]  A. Farmer,et al.  Optimal Betting and Efficiency in Parimutuel Betting Markets with Information Costs , 1996 .

[25]  Bill M. Woodland,et al.  The Reverse Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in Major League Baseball: An Update , 2003 .

[26]  W. Walls,et al.  DECISION COSTS AND BETTING MARKET EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[27]  David Law,et al.  The Favourite-Longshot Bias and Market Efficiency in UK Football Betting , 2000 .