What's hampering measurement invariance: detecting non-invariant items using clusterwise simultaneous component analysis

The issue of measurement invariance is ubiquitous in the behavioral sciences nowadays as more and more studies yield multivariate multigroup data. When measurement invariance cannot be established across groups, this is often due to different loadings on only a few items. Within the multigroup CFA framework, methods have been proposed to trace such non-invariant items, but these methods have some disadvantages in that they require researchers to run a multitude of analyses and in that they imply assumptions that are often questionable. In this paper, we propose an alternative strategy which builds on clusterwise simultaneous component analysis (SCA). Clusterwise SCA, being an exploratory technique, assigns the groups under study to a few clusters based on differences and similarities in the component structure of the items, and thus based on the covariance matrices. Non-invariant items can then be traced by comparing the cluster-specific component loadings via congruence coefficients, which is far more parsimonious than comparing the component structure of all separate groups. In this paper we present a heuristic for this procedure. Afterwards, one can return to the multigroup CFA framework and check whether removing the non-invariant items or removing some of the equality restrictions for these items, yields satisfactory invariance test results. An empirical application concerning cross-cultural emotion data is used to demonstrate that this novel approach is useful and can co-exist with the traditional CFA approaches.

[1]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  A clusterwise simultaneous component method for capturing within-cluster differences in component variances and correlations. , 2013, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[2]  D. Culler,et al.  Comparison of methods , 2000 .

[3]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Some Factors Affecting the Success of Specification Searches in Covariance Structure Modeling. , 1988, Multivariate behavioral research.

[4]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[5]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[6]  H. Kiers,et al.  Selecting among three-mode principal component models of different types and complexities: a numerical convex hull based method. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[7]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[8]  Ira J. Roseman Appraisal in the Emotion System: Coherence in Strategies for Coping , 2013 .

[9]  D Lester,et al.  Locus of control, depression, and suicidal ideation among American, Philippine, and Turkish students. , 1991, The Journal of social psychology.

[10]  Jan M. Rabaey,et al.  Comparison of Methods , 2004 .

[11]  Kaat Van Acker Flanders' real and present threat: How representations of intergroup relations shape attitudes towards Muslim minorities , 2012 .

[12]  H. Kiers,et al.  Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three-mode principal component analysis. , 2009, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[13]  R. Cattell The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[14]  B. Byrne,et al.  Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. , 1989 .

[15]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[16]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Clusterwise simultaneous component analysis for analyzing structural differences in multivariate multiblock data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[17]  D. Sörbom A GENERAL METHOD FOR STUDYING DIFFERENCES IN FACTOR MEANS AND FACTOR STRUCTURE BETWEEN GROUPS , 1974 .

[18]  Jeanne A. Teresi,et al.  An Essay on Measurement and Factorial Invariance , 2006, Medical care.

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[20]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Four simultaneous component models for the analysis of multivariate time series from more than one subject to model intraindividual and interindividual differences , 2003 .

[21]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Modeling Differences in the Dimensionality of Multiblock Data by Means of Clusterwise Simultaneous Component Analysis , 2013, Psychometrika.

[22]  Marieke E. Timmerman,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Adjusting Incorrect Assignments of Items to Subtests , 2009 .

[23]  J W Grice,et al.  Computing and Evaluating Factor Scores , 2004 .

[24]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  CHull: A generic convex-hull-based model selection method , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[25]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[26]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  L. Tucker A METHOD FOR SYNTHESIS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS STUDIES , 1951 .

[28]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Testing for Measurement and Structural Equivalence in Large-Scale Cross-Cultural Studies: Addressing the Issue of Nonequivalence , 2010 .

[29]  J. Berge,et al.  Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. , 2006 .

[30]  Jozefien De Leersnyder,et al.  Where Do My Emotions Belong? A Study of Immigrants’ Emotional Acculturation , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[31]  R. Gorsuch Common Factor Analysis versus Component Analysis: Some Well and Little Known Facts. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[32]  E. Ceulemans,et al.  Universal Intracultural and Intercultural Dimensions of the Recalled Frequency of Emotional Experience , 2006 .

[33]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Hierarchical relations between methods for simultaneous component analysis and a technique for rotation to a simple simultaneous structure , 1994 .

[34]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  B. Mesquita,et al.  Cultural affordances and emotional experience: socially engaging and disengaging emotions in Japan and the United States. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  A. E. Maxwell,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[37]  Elizabeth Thomson,et al.  Normalization Issues in Latent Variable Modeling , 1986 .

[38]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method , 1999 .

[39]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  W. Meredith Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[41]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[42]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[43]  K. G. J8reskoC,et al.  Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations , 2007 .

[44]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling , 1995 .

[45]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[46]  Bert F. Green,et al.  On the factor score controversy , 1976 .

[47]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Robust multilevel simultaneous component analysis , 2013 .

[48]  A. Basilevsky,et al.  Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. , 1964 .

[49]  W F Velicer,et al.  Component Analysis versus Common Factor Analysis: Some issues in Selecting an Appropriate Procedure. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[50]  E. Kevin Kelloway,et al.  Structural equation modelling in perspective. , 1995 .

[51]  Eva Ceulemans,et al.  Measuring Religious Attitudes in Secularized Western European Context: A Psychometric Analysis of the Post-Critical Belief Scale , 2014 .