NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) Component Verification Testing

‡Component testing is a critical facet of the comprehensive thruster life validation strategy devised by the NASA’s Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) program. Component testing to-date has consisted of long-duration high voltage propellant isolator and high-cycle heater life validation testing. The high voltage propellant isolator, a heritage design, will be operated under different environmental condition in the NEXT ion thruster requiring verification testing. The life test of two NEXT isolators was initiated with comparable voltage and pressure conditions with a higher temperature than measured for the NEXT prototype-model thruster. To date the NEXT isolators have accumulated 18,300 hours of operation. Measurements indicate a negligible increase in leakage current over the testing duration to date. NEXT ½” heaters, whose manufacturing and control processes have heritage, were selected for verification testing based upon the change in physical dimensions resulting in a higher operating voltage as well as potential differences in thermal environment. The heater fabrication processes, developed for the International Space Station (ISS) plasma contactor hollow cathode assembly, were utilized with modification of heater dimensions to accommodate a larger cathode. Cyclic testing of five ½” diameter heaters was initiated to validate these modified fabrication processes while retaining high reliability heaters. To date two of the heaters have been cycled to 10,000 cycles and suspended to preserve hardware. Three of the heaters have been cycled to failure giving a B10 life of 12,615 cycles, approximately 6,000 more cycles than the established qualification B10 life of the ISS plasma contactor heaters. Nomenclature B1 = statistical number of cycles in which 1% of components are expected to fail with 90% Confidence B10 = statistical number of cycles in which 10% of components are expected to fail with 90% Confidence F(t) = fraction of units failing t = cycles to failure t0 = origin of distribution η = characteristic life or scale parameter β = slope or shape parameter

[1]  Andrew Hoskins,et al.  Development of a Prototype Model Ion Thruster for the NEXT System , 2004 .

[2]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Long-Duration Test Plume and Wear Characteristics after 16,550 h of Operation and 337 kg of Xenon Processed , 2008 .

[3]  James S. Sovey,et al.  NEXT Thruster Component Verification Testing , 2007 .

[4]  Jonathan L. VanNoord,et al.  Lifetime Assessment of the NEXT Ion Thruster , 2010 .

[5]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Results of the 2000 hr Wear Test of the HiPEP Ion Thruster with Pyrolytic Graphite Ion Optics , 2006 .

[6]  Gary Wang,et al.  Vibration Test of a Breadboard Gimbal for the NEXT Ion Engine , 2006 .

[7]  Michael Cupples,et al.  Application of Solar Electric Propulsion to a Comet Surface Sample Return Mission , 2006 .

[8]  Daniel A. Herman,et al.  Application of the NEXT Ion Thruster Lifetime Assessment to Thruster Throttling , 2008 .

[9]  Dan M. Goebel,et al.  Investigation and development of a high voltage propellant isolator for ion thrusters , 2005 .

[10]  John R. Brophy,et al.  Status of the Extended Life Test of the Deep Space 1 Flight Spare Ion Engine After 30,000 Hours of Operation , 2003 .

[11]  M. Rayman The successful conclusion of the Deep Space 1 Mission: important results without a flashy title , 2002 .

[12]  Steven R. Oleson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Configurations and Performance for Saturn System Exploration , 2007 .

[13]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Prototype-Model NEXT Ion Thruster , 2007 .

[14]  M. A. Mantenieks,et al.  Status of 30-centimeter-diameter mercury ion thruster isolator development , 1976 .

[15]  Laurence A. Soderblom,et al.  Deep Space 1 mission and observation of comet Borrelly , 2002, The 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 2002. MWSCAS-2002..

[16]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Mission Advantages of NEXT: NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster , 2002 .

[17]  Fred Wilson,et al.  Development of a Ground Based Digital Control Interface Unit (DCIU) for the NEXT Propulsion System , 2004 .

[18]  Fred Wilson,et al.  Development Status of the NEXT Propellant Management System , 2004 .

[19]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  Space Station Cathode Design, Performance, and Operating Specifications , 1998 .

[20]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Engine 2000 Hour Wear Test Results , 2004 .

[21]  Michael J. Patterson,et al.  NEXT Ion Propulsion System Development Status and Capabilities , 2008 .

[22]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Performance of the NSTAR ion propulsion system on the Deep Space One mission , 2001 .

[23]  Kevin E. Witzberger,et al.  Deep Space Mission Applications for NEXT: NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster , 2004 .

[24]  Jonathan L. Van Noord NEXT Ion Thruster Thermal Model , 2007 .