Rapid responses of the cupula in the lateral line of ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus)

Displacements of cupulae in the supraorbital lateral line canal in ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) have been measured using laser interferometry and by applying transient as well as sinusoidal fluid stimuli in the lateral line canal. The cupular displacement in response to impulses of fluid velocity shows damped oscillations at approximately 120 Hz and a relaxation time-constant of 4.4 ms, commensurate with a quality factor of approximately 1.8. These values are in close agreement with the frequency characteristics determined via sinusoidal fluid stimuli, implying that the nonlinearity of cupular dynamics imposed by the gating apparatus of the sensory hair cells is limited in the range of cupular displacements and velocities measured (100–300 nm; 100–300 μm/s). The measurements also show that cupular displacement instantaneously follows the initial waveform of transient stimuli. The functional significance of the observed cupular dynamics is discussed.

[1]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[2]  Alfon B. A. Kroese,et al.  Sensory Transduction in Lateral Line Hair cells , 1989 .

[3]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Functional Evolution of Lateral Line and Inner Ear Sensory Systems , 1989 .

[4]  A. Kroese,et al.  Frequency response of the lateral-line organ of xenopus laevis , 1978, Pflügers Archiv.

[5]  J. Nishii,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidences that the lateral line is involved in the inter-sexual vibrational communication of the himé salmon (landlocked red salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka) , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Hydrodynamic and Acoustic Field Detection , 1988 .

[7]  Sietse M. van Netten,et al.  Temperature dependency of cupular mechanics and hair cell frequency selectivity in the fish canal lateral line organ , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[8]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Hydrodynamic stimuli and the fish lateral line , 2000, Nature.

[9]  C. Campenhausen,et al.  Sensory performance of blind mexican cave fish after destruction of the canal neuromasts , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  J. Janssen,et al.  Non-visual feeding behavior of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi, in Lake Michigan , 1985, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[11]  R. Blickhan,et al.  The time course and frequency content of hydrodynamic events caused by moving fish, frogs, and crustaceans , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  R. Wubbels,et al.  AFFERENT RESPONSE OF A HEAD CANAL NEUROMAST OF THE RUFF (ACERINA-CERNUA) LATERAL LINE , 1992 .

[13]  E. Denton,et al.  Mechanical factors in the excitation of clupeid lateral lines , 1983, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Role of lateral line in fish behaviour , 1986 .

[15]  S M Khanna,et al.  Stiffness changes of the cupula associated with the mechanics of hair cells in the fish lateral line. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  T. Pitcher,et al.  The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision , 1980, Journal of comparative physiology.

[17]  T. Pitcher.  Behaviour of Teleost Fishes , 1986 .

[18]  S M van Netten,et al.  Hair cell mechano-transduction: its influence on the gross mechanical characteristics of a hair cell sense organ. , 1997, Biophysical chemistry.

[19]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Sensory Tuning of Lateral Line Receptors in Antarctic Fish to the Movements of Planktonic Prey , 1987, Science.

[20]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Behavioral and neurophysiological assessment of lateral line sensitivity in the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  I. J. Russell,et al.  Amphibian Lateral Line Receptors , 1976 .

[22]  S. M. van Netten.  Hydrodynamics of the excitation of the cupula in the fish canal , 1991 .

[23]  Sietse M. van Netten,et al.  Laser interferometric measurements on the dynamic behaviour of the cupula in the fish lateral line , 1987, Hearing Research.

[24]  S. Dijkgraaf.  THE FUNCTIONING and SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LATERAL‐LINE ORGANS , 1963, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[25]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Putting ion channels to work: mechanoelectrical transduction, adaptation, and amplification by hair cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Robert C. Eaton,et al.  NEURAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PHASE MODEL FOR LOCALISING IMPULSE SOUNDS BY THE MAUTHNER SYSTEM , 2002 .

[27]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  The Mechanosensory Lateral Line , 1989 .

[28]  N A Schellart,et al.  Velocity- and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Behavioral Investigations on the Functions of the Lateral Line and Inner Ear in Predation , 1989 .

[30]  J. Gray,et al.  Some Observations on the Forces Acting on Neuromasts in Fish Lateral Line Canals , 1989 .

[31]  R. Eatock,et al.  Adaptation in hair cells. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Jelle Atema,et al.  Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals , 1988, Springer New York.

[33]  P Tsang.  Laser interferometric flow measurements in the lateral line organ , 1997 .

[34]  Application of incident light polarization microscopy. , 1990 .