Evaluating carotid and aortic peak velocity variation as an alternative index for stroke volume and pulse pressure variation: A method comparison study

[1]  M. Mischi,et al.  Carotid Doppler ultrasound for non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring: a narrative review , 2022, Physiological measurement.

[2]  J. Teboul,et al.  Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What’s new? , 2022, Annals of Intensive Care.

[3]  Yi Ji,et al.  Stroke volume variation for predicting responsiveness to fluid therapy in patients undergoing cardiac and thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2022, BMJ Open.

[4]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Perioperative liberal versus restrictive fluid strategies and postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and metanalysis on randomised-controlled trials in major abdominal elective surgery , 2021, Critical Care.

[5]  Bruce D. Johnson,et al.  Carotid Doppler ultrasonography correlates with stroke volume in a human model of hypovolaemia and resuscitation: analysis of 48 570 cardiac cycles. , 2021, British journal of anaesthesia.

[6]  Bruce D. Johnson,et al.  Carotid Doppler Measurement Variability in Functional Hemodynamic Monitoring: An Analysis of 17,822 Cardiac Cycles , 2021, Critical care explorations.

[7]  K. Corl,et al.  Respiratory Variation in Carotid Artery Peak Systolic Velocity Is Unable to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Spontaneously Breathing Critically Ill Patients When Assessed by Novice Physician Sonologists , 2020, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[8]  I. Douglas,et al.  Fluid Response Evaluation in Sepsis Hypotension and Shock , 2020, Chest.

[9]  J. Fields,et al.  Carotid Ultrasound to Predict Fluid Responsiveness , 2020, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[10]  P. Blanco.  Rationale for using the velocity–time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings , 2020, The Ultrasound Journal.

[11]  J. Eibl,et al.  A Carotid Doppler Patch Accurately Tracks Stroke Volume Changes During a Preload-Modifying Maneuver in Healthy Volunteers , 2020, Critical care explorations.

[12]  M. Ramsay,et al.  New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring. , 2019, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  Bo Yao,et al.  Respiratory variation in peripheral arterial blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, BMC Anesthesiology.

[14]  Y. Choi,et al.  Carotid ultrasound measurements for assessing fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: corrected flow time and respirophasic variation in blood flow peak velocity , 2018, British journal of anaesthesia.

[15]  Christa Boer,et al.  Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  M. Stites,et al.  Stroke volume guided resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock improves outcomes , 2017, Journal of critical care.

[17]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Incorporating Dynamic Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness Into Goal-Directed Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Critical care medicine.

[18]  N. Ayas,et al.  Will This Hemodynamically Unstable Patient Respond to a Bolus of Intravenous Fluids? , 2016, JAMA.

[19]  W. Buhre,et al.  Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  P. Smielewski,et al.  Regulation of the cerebral circulation: bedside assessment and clinical implications , 2016, Critical Care.

[21]  M. Leeflang,et al.  Predicting Fluid Responsiveness by Passive Leg Raising: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 23 Clinical Trials* , 2016, Critical care medicine.

[22]  D. Chassard,et al.  Respiratory variation in aortic blood flow peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2016, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[23]  A. Gelb,et al.  Cardiac Output and Cerebral Blood Flow: The Integrated Regulation of Brain Perfusion in Adult Humans , 2015, Anesthesiology.

[24]  J. Diaz-Gomez,et al.  Respiratory variation in carotid peak systolic velocity predicts volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock: a prospective cohort study , 2015, Critical Ultrasound Journal.

[25]  D. Chemla,et al.  Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey? , 2015, Critical Care.

[26]  J. Shim,et al.  Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease. , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[27]  C. Boer,et al.  Level of agreement between laboratory and point-of-care prothrombin time before and after cardiopulmonary bypass in cardiac surgery. , 2014, Thrombosis research.

[28]  John C. O’Horo,et al.  Arterial Catheters as a Source of Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[29]  P. Marik,et al.  The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. , 2013, Chest.

[30]  C. Colebourn,et al.  Can Transthoracic Echocardiography Be Used to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Critically Ill Patient? A Systematic Review , 2012, Critical care research and practice.

[31]  Baolong Lu,et al.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2011, Journal of Anesthesia.

[32]  M. J. Rice,et al.  Let's think clinically instead of mathematically about device accuracy. , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[33]  A. Ho,et al.  A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[34]  Charles J Bruce,et al.  Guidelines for Performing a Comprehensive Transesophageal Echocardiographic Examination: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists , 2007, Anesthesia and Analgesia.

[35]  Richard S C Cobbold,et al.  Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[36]  Clifford Kavinsky,et al.  Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[37]  J. Teboul,et al.  Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. , 2001, Chest.

[38]  M. Pinsky.  Functional hemodynamic monitoring. , 2015, Critical care clinics.

[39]  J. Chambers,et al.  Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.