Cognitive Modelling of Emotion Contagion in a Crowd of Soccer Supporter Agents

This paper introduces a cognitive computational model of emotion contagion in a crowd of soccer supporters. It is useful for: (1) better understanding of the emotion contagion processes and (2) further development into a predictive and advising application for soccer stadium managers to enhance and improve the ambiance during the soccer game for safety or economic reasons. The model is neurologically grounded and focuses on the emotions “pleasure” and “sadness”. Structured simulations showed the following four emergent patterns of emotion contagion: (1) hooligans are very impulsive and are not fully open for other emotions, (2) fanatic supporters are very impulsive and open for other emotions, (3) family members are very easily influenced and are not very extravert, (4) the media is less sensible to the ambiance in the stadium. For validation of the model, the model outcomes were compared to the heart rate of 100 supporters and reported emotions. The model produced similar heart rate and emotional patterns. Further implications of the model are discussed.

[1]  Jan Treur,et al.  Modelling and analysis of social contagion in dynamic networks , 2014, Neurocomputing.

[2]  Jonathan Cavanagh,et al.  Localisation of regions of intense pleasure response evoked by soccer goals , 2009, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[3]  L. Back,et al.  Beyond the racist/hooligan couplet: race, social theory and football culture. , 1999, The British journal of sociology.

[4]  Robert Biswas-Diener,et al.  Prosocial Spending and Well-Being: Cross-Cultural Evidence for a Psychological Universal , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Tomoichi Takahashi,et al.  Agent Evacuation Simulation Using a Hybrid Network and Free Space Models , 2009, PRIMA.

[6]  Marco Iacoboni,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System and Imitation , 2011 .

[7]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI , 2001, Neuroreport.

[8]  P. Dayan,et al.  Differential Encoding of Losses and Gains in the Human Striatum , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  A Multi-agent Model for Emotion Contagion Spirals Integrated within a Supporting Ambient Agent Model , 2009, PRIMA.

[10]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron System , 2005, PLoS biology.

[11]  J. Tanji,et al.  Role for cingulate motor area cells in voluntary movement selection based on reward. , 1998, Science.

[12]  A. Smit,et al.  Synapse Formation between Central Neurons Requires Postsynaptic Expression of the MEN1 Tumor Suppressor Gene , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires , 2005, Cognition & emotion.

[14]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Modelling collective decision making in groups and crowds: Integrating social contagion and interacting emotions, beliefs and intentions , 2013, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[17]  M. Goligorsky,et al.  The concept of cellular "fight-or-flight" reaction to stress. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Renal physiology.

[18]  Tibor Bosse,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling of Emotion Contagion in Groups , 2015, Cognitive Computation.

[19]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Predictive Neural Coding of Reward Preference Involves Dissociable Responses in Human Ventral Midbrain and Ventral Striatum , 2006, Neuron.