Classification trees for species identification of fish-school echotraces

Fernandes, P. G. 2009. Classification trees for species identification of fish-school echotraces. - ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1073-1080.Acoustic surveys provide valuable information on the abundance and distribution of many fish species, but are particularly effective for schooling pelagic fish of commercial importance. However, despite recent advances in multifrequency processing, the technique still requires some subjective judgement when allocating the acoustic data, fish-school echotraces, to particular species—the so-called “scrutiny process”. This is assisted by “ground truth” trawling and operator experience of relating trawl data to echotraces of particular fish schools. In this paper, a method to identify species based on “classification trees” is applied to data from a component of the International North Sea Herring Acoustic Survey. Classification trees may be considered as a variant of decision trees, and have properties that are intuitive to biologists, because they are similar to the keys used for the biological identification of species. The method described here incorporates a multifrequency fish-school filter, image analysis to isolate fish-school echotraces, and finally, a classification-tree system using the multifrequency information from the ground-truthed echotraces that can be translated into a processing tool for objective species allocation. The classification-tree system is compared with the traditional method of expert-based scrutiny. Unlike the latter, however, a measure of uncertainty is attributed to the classification-tree approach and this could be propagated through the acoustic-survey estimation procedure as a component of the total uncertainty in the abundance estimate.

[1]  K. Foote.  Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation : a practical guide , 1987 .

[2]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Standard protocols for the analysis of school based data from echo sounder surveys , 2000 .

[3]  E. Murphy,et al.  Interpretation of acoustic data at two frequencies to discriminate between Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) and other scatterers , 1993 .

[4]  J. Rasmus Nielsen,et al.  A method for the possible species discrimination of juvenile gadoids by broad-bandwidth backscattering spectra vs. angle of incidence , 2008 .

[5]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Inference of biological and physical parameters in an internal wave using multiple-frequency, acoustic-scattering data , 2003 .

[6]  Rodney D. Hale,et al.  Acoustic species identification in the Northwest Atlantic using digital image processing , 2000 .

[7]  P. Archambault,et al.  Acoustic detection of a scallop bed from a single-beam echosounder in the St. Lawrence , 2005 .

[8]  E. Ona,et al.  An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data , 2002 .

[9]  M. Barangé,et al.  Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information , 2001 .

[10]  David G. Reid.  Report on Echo Trace Classification , 2000 .

[11]  Ole Arve Misund,et al.  Swimming behaviour of fish schools in the North Sea during acoustic surveying and pelagic trawl sampling , 1992 .

[12]  Rudy J. Kloser,et al.  Species identification in deep water using multiple acoustic frequencies , 2002 .

[13]  E. Ona,et al.  Synthetic echograms generated from the relative frequency response , 2003 .

[14]  Andrew S. Brierley,et al.  Acoustic discrimination of Southern Ocean zooplankton , 1998 .

[15]  P. Wiebe,et al.  Determining dominant scatterers of sound in mixed zooplankton populations. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  John K. Horne,et al.  Acoustic approaches to remote species identification: a review , 2000 .

[17]  G. De’ath.  Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. , 2007, Ecology.

[18]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  An investigation into the zooplankton composition of a prominent 38 kHz scattering layer in the North Sea. , 2005 .

[19]  P. Brehmer,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn , 2006 .

[20]  John M. Wallace,et al.  Avoidance and escape behaviour by herring encountering midwater trawls , 1997 .

[21]  Verified acoustic identification of Atlantic mackerel , 2004 .

[22]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[23]  G. De’ath,et al.  CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREES: A POWERFUL YET SIMPLE TECHNIQUE FOR ECOLOGICAL DATA ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[24]  J. Simmonds,et al.  Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis , 1996 .

[25]  M. Cardinale,et al.  Comparison of the selectivity of three pelagic sampling trawls in a hydroacoustic survey , 1999 .

[26]  Debby L. Burwen,et al.  Mixture models for the species apportionment of hydroacoustic data, with echo-envelope length as the discriminatory variable , 2003 .

[27]  J. Horne,et al.  Potential acoustic discrimination within boreal fish assemblages , 2004 .

[28]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[29]  R. E. Thorne,et al.  Ground truth and target identification for fisheries acoustics , 2000 .

[30]  Robert Kieser,et al.  Classification of Fish Assemblages based on Echo Integration Surveys , 1991 .

[31]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals , 1996 .

[32]  A. Brierley,et al.  Identification of Southern Ocean acoustic targets using aggregation backscatter and shape characteristics , 2003 .

[33]  E. John Simmonds,et al.  Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[34]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Characterization of Patches Along Transects Using High-Resolution 70-kHz Integrated Acoustic Data , 1989 .

[35]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Multifrequency backscattering properties of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) and Norway pout (Trisopterus esmarkii) , 2007 .

[36]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  Hydroacoustic Signal Classification of Fish Schools by Species , 1988 .

[37]  S. Georgakarakos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools , 1996 .

[38]  A. Brierley,et al.  Pinging down the food web: multi-frequency acoustic discrimination of jellyfish and fish , 2004 .

[39]  J. Tegowski,et al.  Statistical analysis of acoustic echoes from underwater meadows in the eutrophic Puck Bay (southern Baltic Sea) , 2003 .

[40]  Egil Ona,et al.  Acoustic backscattering by Atlantic mackerel as being representative of fish that lack a swimbladder. Backscattering by individual fish , 2005 .

[41]  David N. MacLennan,et al.  Fisheries and plankton acoustics: past, present, and future , 1996 .

[42]  M. Furusawa,et al.  Effective and accurate use of difference in mean volume backscattering strength to identify fish and plankton , 2002 .

[43]  Paul G. Fernandes,et al.  Proposals for the collection of multifrequency acoustic data , 2008 .

[44]  Manuel Barange,et al.  Acoustic identification, classification and structure of biological patchiness on the edge of the Agulhas Bank and its relation to frontal features , 1994 .