Compliance and Emissions Trading under the Kyoto Protocol: Rules for Uncertain Inventories

A solution is proposed for proving compliance with emission targets and for emissions trading in the event of uncertainties in reported emission inventories. The solution is based on the undershooting concept, from which the mathematical conditions for both proving compliance with a risk α and calculating effective emissions for trading are derived. Based on the reported emission units, the number of permits granted is reduced in proportion to the uncertainty in the inventory. A country whose inventory has higher uncertainty is thereby allotted fewer permits than a country with the same inventory but smaller uncertainty.

[1]  Joanna Horabik,et al.  Preparatory Signal Detection for Annex I Countries under the Kyoto Protocol - A Lesson for the Post-Kyoto Policy Process , 2004 .

[2]  W. Montgomery,et al.  Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs" Journal of Economic Theory , 1972 .

[3]  K. Rypdal,et al.  Uncertainties in the Norwegian Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory , 2000 .

[4]  R. Milne,et al.  Annual Report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2001 .

[5]  O. Godal.  Simulating the Carbon Permit Market with Imperfect Observations of Emissions: Approaching Equilibriu , 2000 .

[6]  O. Godal,et al.  Compliance and Imperfect Intertemporal Carbon Trading , 2003 .

[7]  W. Winiwarter,et al.  Uncertainties in greenhouse gas emission inventories — evaluation, comparability and implications , 2001 .

[8]  W. Nordhaus.  Life after Kyoto: Alternative Approaches to Global Warming , 2005 .

[9]  Sten Nilsson,et al.  Prior to Economic Treatment of Emissions and Their Uncertainties Under the Kyoto Protocol: Scientific Uncertainties That Must Be Kept in Mind , 2007 .

[10]  J. Cohen,et al.  Practical Policy Applications of Uncertainty Analysis for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2007 .

[11]  D. Victor.  Limits of market-based strategies for slowing global warming: The case of tradeable permits , 1991 .

[12]  Wilfried Winiwarter,et al.  Assessing the uncertainty associated with national greenhouse gas emission inventories:: a case study for Austria , 2001 .

[14]  Wilfried Winiwarter,et al.  National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Understanding Uncertainties versus Potential for Improving Reliability , 2007 .

[15]  A. V. Amstel,et al.  Improving the quality of national greenhouse gas inventories , 1999 .

[16]  L. Cárdenas,et al.  UK greenhouse gas inventory 1990 to 2006: annual report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2006 .

[17]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Full Carbon Account for Russia , 2000 .

[18]  Processing National CO2 Inventory Emissions Data and their Total Uncertainty Estimates , 2007 .

[19]  Jong-Wuu Wu,et al.  A Note on the Correlation of Fuzzy Numbers by Expected Interval , 2001, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Wallace E. Oates,et al.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[21]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Carbon Trading with Imperfectly Observable Emissions , 2003 .

[22]  Sanna Syri,et al.  Uncertainties in the Finnish greenhouse gas emission inventory , 2004 .

[23]  R. Gawin.  Level and Trend Uncertainties of Kyoto Relevant Greenhouse Gases in Poland , 2002 .

[24]  M. Obersteiner.  Avoiding a Lemons Market by Including Uncertainty in the Kyoto Protocol: Same Mechanism - Improved Rules , 2000 .

[25]  Xander Olsthoorn,et al.  The role of scientific uncertainty in compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the climate change convention , 2003 .