Assessment of the masking effects of birdsong on the road traffic noise environment.

This study aims to explore how the soundscape quality of traffic noise environments can be improved by the masking effects of birdsong in terms of four soundscape characteristics, i.e., perceived loudness, naturalness, annoyance and pleasantness. Four factors that may influence the masking effects of birdsong (i.e., distance of the receiver from a sound source, loudness of masker, occurrence frequencies of masker, and visibility of sound sources) were examined by listening tests. The results show that the masking effects are more significant in the road traffic noise environments with lower sound levels (e.g., <52.5 dBA), or of distance from traffic (e.g., >19 m). Adding birdsong can indeed increase the naturalness and pleasantness of the traffic noise environment at different distances of the receiver from a road. Naturalness, annoyance, and pleasantness, but not perceived loudness, can be altered by increasing the birdsong loudness (i.e., from 37.5 to 52.5 dBA in this study). The pleasantness of traffic noise environments increases significantly from 2.7 to 6.7, when the occurrence of birdsong over a period of 30 s is increased from 2 to 6 times. The visibility of the sound source also influences the masking effects, but its effect is not as significant as the effects of the three other factors.

[1]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Jiang Liu,et al.  Soundscape design in city parks: exploring the relationships between soundscape composition parameters and physical and psychoacoustic parameters , 2015 .

[3]  W. Yost Perceiving Sound Sources , 2008 .

[4]  Kristian Jambrošić,et al.  Assessment of urban soundscapes with the focus on an architectural installation with musical features. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Jian Kang Urban Sound Environment , 2006 .

[6]  D. Dubois,et al.  A cognitive approach to urban soundscapes : Using verbal data to access everyday life auditory categories , 2006 .

[7]  B C Moore Mechanisms of masking. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Chapter 5 – Frequency Analysis and Masking , 1995 .

[9]  T. Andringa,et al.  Sound event recognition through expectancy-based evaluation ofsignal-driven hypotheses , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Wouter Halfwerk,et al.  A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Kirill V. Horoshenkov,et al.  The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Auditory masking: Need for improved conceptual structurea) , 2006 .

[13]  M. Nilsson,et al.  A field experiment on the impact of sounds from a jet-and-basin fountain on soundscape quality in an urban park , 2014 .

[14]  B. Seeber Masking and Critical Bands , 2008 .

[15]  Darby Jack,et al.  Impact of biomass fuels on pregnancy outcomes in central East India , 2014, Environmental Health.

[16]  B. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Note on informational masking (L) , 2003 .

[17]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jean-François Augoyard,et al.  Sonic Experience: A Guide to Everyday Sounds , 2006 .

[19]  Virginia Best,et al.  Spatial unmasking of birdsong in human listeners: energetic and informational factors. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  R. Simons,et al.  Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments , 1991 .

[21]  Pyoung Jik Lee,et al.  Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  C. Guastavino The ideal urban soundscape : Investigating the sound quality of french cities , 2006 .

[23]  Massimiliano Masullo,et al.  The influence of visual characteristics of barriers on railway noise perception. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Catherine Guastavino,et al.  Categorization of environmental sounds. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[25]  Bert De Coensel,et al.  Effects of natural sounds on the perception of road traffic noise. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  Jian Kang,et al.  Landscape effects on soundscape experience in city parks. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  Kozo Hiramatsu,et al.  Time-component matrix chart as a tool for designing sonic environment having a diversity of sound sources , 2009 .

[28]  P. Clergeau,et al.  Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient : A comparative study between two cities on different continents , 1998 .

[29]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Some comments on informational masking , 2005 .

[30]  Yiying Hao,et al.  Effects of Urban Morphology on Urban Sound Environment from the Perspective of Masking Effects , 2014 .

[31]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework , 1995 .

[32]  G. Kidd,et al.  The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Hendrik Tieben,et al.  Environmental Urban Design and Planning Rules and their Impact on Street Spaces in Hong Kong and Macau , 2015 .

[34]  N. Durlach,et al.  Auditory masking: need for improved conceptual structure. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Karl Bolin,et al.  Loudness of fountain and road traffic sounds in a city park , 2009 .

[36]  Wilson P. Tanner What is Masking , 1958 .

[37]  D. Botteldooren,et al.  The Influence of Traffic Noise on Appreciation of the Living Quality of a Neighborhood , 2011, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[38]  A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson,et al.  Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas , 2007 .

[39]  Alan M. Brown,et al.  An approach to the acoustic design of outdoor space , 2004 .

[40]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Non-auditory factors affecting urban soundscape evaluation. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  R. K. Reddy,et al.  Categorization of environmental sounds , 2009, Biological Cybernetics.

[42]  S. A. Temple,et al.  Area-Dependent Changes in the Bird Communities and Vegetation of Southern Wisconsin Forests , 1983 .

[43]  Jian Kang,et al.  Soundscape and Sound Preferences in Urban Squares: A Case Study in Sheffield , 2005 .

[44]  Mats E. Nilsson,et al.  Effects of Sounds from Water on Perception of Acoustic Environments Dominated by Road-Traffic Noise , 2013 .

[45]  J. Dunning,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BREEDING BIRD DENSITY AND VEGETATION VOLUME , 1991 .

[46]  S. Croci,et al.  Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: Analysis at different European latitudes , 2006 .

[47]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal daily routines of singing and foraging in a bird singing to attract a mate , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[48]  J. Atwell,et al.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Shafiquzzaman Khan,et al.  The Potential of Natural Sounds to Mask Wind Turbine Noise , 2010 .