On the modularity of face recognition: the riddle of domain specificity.

The present paper focuses on the modular attributes of face recognition, defined in terms of domain specificity. Domain specificity is examined by looking into the innate nature of face recognition, the special effects related to the recognition of inverted faces, the specificity of electrophysiological responsivity to facial stimuli, and the specific impairment in face recognition associated with localized brain damage. Converging evidence from these sources seems to consistently show that face recognition is not qualitatively unique, as it proceeds in a manner similar to the recognition of other visuospatial objects. However, it seems to be special in that it may involve specific mechanisms dedicated to face recognition. Among infants, differential responsivity to faces and to other objects in terms of age of onset, attraction and course of development, seems to indicate the operation of a special process. Unusual inversion effects in face recognition might be due to the special expertise that humans develop for recognizing upright faces. Face-selective single unit responses in the monkey's brain implies the existence in the visual system of cells which are exclusively dedicated to the processing of facial stimuli. Finally, in prosopagnosia localized brain damage is linked to a specific inability to recognize familiar faces. Taken together, the data seem to show that some elements in the process of face recognition are domain specific, and in that sense, modular.

[1]  C. Pallis IMPAIRED IDENTIFICATION OF FACES AND PLACES WITH AGNOSIA FOR COLOURS , 1955, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[2]  D. MacRae,et al.  The defect of function in visual agnosia. , 1956, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  H. Hécaen,et al.  Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). , 1962, Archives of neurology.

[4]  J. Morton A Preliminary Functional Model for Language Behaviour , 1964 .

[5]  A. Treisman VERBAL CUES, LANGUAGE, AND MEANING IN SELECTIVE ATTENTION. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  Hoben Thomas,et al.  VISUAL-FIXATION RESPONSES OF INFANTS TO STIMULI OF VARYING COMPLEXITY , 1965 .

[7]  J. Kagan,et al.  Infants' differential reactions to familiar and distorted faces. , 1966, Child development.

[8]  J. Kagan,et al.  Patterns of fixation in the young infant. , 1966, Child development.

[9]  J. Konorski Integrative activity of the brain : an interdisciplinary approach , 1967 .

[10]  J. Kagan,et al.  Attention in the infant: effects of complexity, contour, perimeter, and familiarity. , 1967, Child development.

[11]  E. Warrington,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Facial Recognition in Patients with Unilateral Cerebral Lesions , 1967 .

[12]  A facial dimension in visual discrimination by human infants. , 1967 .

[13]  E. W. Ames,et al.  INFANTS' PREFERENCES FOR FACIAL ARRANGEMENTS: A FAILURE TO REPLICATE , 1968 .

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  O. Spreen,et al.  Developmental norms for 15 neuropsychological tests age 6 to 15. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[16]  B. Wilcox Visual preferences of human infants for representations of the human face. , 1969, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

[17]  H. Munitz,et al.  Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. , 1969, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[18]  Hans Spinnler,et al.  Perceptual and associative disorders of visual recognition , 1969, Neurology.

[19]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[20]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[21]  G. C. Carpenter Differential Visual Behavior to Human and Humanoid Faces in Early Infancy. , 1970 .

[22]  H. L. Bras,et al.  Le probleme de la specificite du deficit de la reconnaissance du visage humain lors des lesions hemispheriques unilaterales , 1970 .

[23]  K. F. Scapinello,et al.  The role of familiarity and orientation in immediate and delayed recognition of pictorial stimuli , 1970 .

[24]  H. McGurk The role of object orientation in infant perception. , 1970, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

[25]  L E Krueger,et al.  Effect of bracketing lines on speed of "same"-"different" judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1970, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[26]  R. Yin,et al.  Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? , 1970, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  A. J. Marcel,et al.  Some constraints on sequential and parallel processing, and the limits of attention , 1970 .

[28]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  Recognition memory for familiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay , 1971 .

[29]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference , 1971 .

[30]  John L. Bradshaw,et al.  Models for the processing and identification of faces , 1971 .

[31]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Fagan,et al.  Infants' recognition memory for faces. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[33]  A. Benton,et al.  Prosopagnosia and facial discrimination. , 1972, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[34]  B. Pillon,et al.  [Anatomoclinical study of a case of prosopagnosia]. , 1972, Revue neurologique (Paris).

[35]  Lester E. Kreuger Effect of irrelevant surrounding material on speed of same-different judgment of two adjacent letters. , 1973 .

[36]  Howard S. Hock,et al.  The effects of stimulus structure and familiarity on same-different comparison , 1973 .

[37]  I. Rock The perception of disoriented figures. , 1974, Scientific American.

[38]  R. A. Haaf Complexity and facial resemblance as determinants of response to facelike stimuli by 5-and 10-week-old infants , 1974 .

[39]  M. Masure,et al.  Une nouvelle observation d'agnosie d'objet. deficit de l'association ou de la categorisation, specifique de la modalite visuelle? ☆ , 1974 .

[40]  C. C. Goren,et al.  Visual following and pattern discrimination of face-like stimuli by newborn infants. , 1975, Pediatrics.

[41]  Hadyn D. Ellis,et al.  Recognition of Upright and Inverted Faces Presented in the Left and Right Visual Fields , 1975, Cortex.

[42]  A. G. Goldstein,et al.  Recognition of inverted photographs of faces by children and adults. , 1975, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[43]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  D. Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants. , 1976, Child development.

[45]  R. A. Haaf,et al.  Infants' response to facelike patterns: developmental changes between 10 and 15 weeks of age. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  E. T. Rolls,et al.  Activity of neurones in the inferotemporal cortex of the alert monkey , 1977, Brain Research.

[47]  S. Carey,et al.  From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. , 1977, Science.

[48]  R. A. Haaf Visual Response to Complex Facelike Patterns by 15- and 20-Week-Old Infants. , 1977 .

[49]  R. Yin Face Perception: A Review of Experiments with Infants, Normal Adults, and Brain-Injured Persons , 1978 .

[50]  Susan Carey,et al.  Upright and Inverted Faces: The Right Hemisphere Knows the Difference , 1978, Cortex.

[51]  V. Bruce Searching for Politicians: An Information-Processing Approach to Face Recognition , 1979 .

[52]  JANOS KURUCZ,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia Associated with Chronic Organic Brain Syndrome , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[53]  E. Rolls,et al.  Visual responses of neurons in the dorsolateral amygdala of the alert monkey , 1979, Experimental Neurology.

[54]  R. Phillips,et al.  Recognition of Upright and Inverted Faces: A Correlational Study , 1979, Perception.

[55]  H. Ehrlichman,et al.  Opposite visual hemifield superiorities in face recognition as a function of cognitive style , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  H. Hannay,et al.  Individual Differences and Asymmetry Effects in Memory for Unfamiliar Faces , 1979, Cortex.

[57]  Human Visual Cognition: A Study in Experimental Cognitive Psychology , 1979 .

[58]  J Kurucz,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia as a Symptom of Cerebral Organic Disease , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[59]  V. Mann,et al.  Development of voice recognition: parallels with face recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[60]  A. Young,et al.  Absence of Any Developmental Trend in Right Hemisphere Superiority for Face Recognition , 1980, Cortex.

[61]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[62]  R. Flin Age effects in children's memory for unfamiliar faces. , 1980 .

[63]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Upright and inverted faces, and housefronts, in the two visual fields: A right and a Left hemisphere contribution , 1980 .

[64]  S. Carey,et al.  Development of face recognition: A maturational component? , 1980 .

[65]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[66]  D. Maurer,et al.  Infants' perception of natural and distorted arrangements of a schematic face. , 1981, Child development.

[67]  R. Bruyer,et al.  [Unilateral cerebral lesion and disturbance of face perception. Specificity of the deficit? (author's transl)]. , 1981, Acta neurologica Belgica.

[68]  A. Young,et al.  Accuracy of Naming Laterally Presented Known Faces by Children and Adults , 1981, Cortex.

[69]  Stanfield Rc Lateral asymmetry in face perception. , 1981 .

[70]  A. Young,et al.  The human face , 1982 .

[71]  C. Bruce,et al.  Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect , 1982, Neuropsychologia.

[72]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[73]  H S Levin,et al.  Prosopagnosia: adouble dissociation between the recognition offamiliar andunfamiliar faces , 1982 .

[74]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Organization of visuospatial functions in human cortex. Evidence from electrical stimulation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[75]  E. Shuttleworth,et al.  Further observations on the nature of prosopagnosia , 1982, Brain and Cognition.

[76]  Susan Carey,et al.  7 – Face Perception: Anomalies of Development1 , 1982 .

[77]  P. Feyereisen,et al.  A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[78]  B Milner,et al.  Perception of faces by patients with localized cortical excisions. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[79]  A. Young 6 – THE DEVELOPMENT OF RIGHT HEMISPHERE ABILITIES , 1983 .

[80]  A. Damasio,et al.  The anatomic basis of pure alexia , 1983, Neurology.

[81]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[82]  Yoshio Takane,et al.  Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgments , 1983 .

[83]  H. Ellis 2 – THE ROLE OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE IN FACE PERCEPTION , 1983 .

[84]  T. Crow,et al.  Integration of Schematic Faces and Other Complex Objects in Schizophrenia , 1983, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[85]  J. Blanc-Garin Perception des visages et reconnaissance de la physionomie dans l'agnosie des visages , 1984 .

[86]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[87]  A. W. Ellis Reading, Writing and Dyslexia: A Cognitive Analysis , 1984 .

[88]  R. Desimone,et al.  Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[89]  Tim Shallice,et al.  More functionally isolable subsystems but fewer “modules”? , 1984, Cognition.

[90]  A. Young,et al.  Right cerebral hemisphere superiority for recognizing the internal and external features of famous faces. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[91]  Rolls Et Neurons in the cortex of the temporal lobe and in the amygdala of the monkey with responses selective for faces. , 1984 .

[92]  J. Ferro,et al.  Associative Visual Agnosia: A Case Study , 1984, Cortex.

[93]  Models and modules , 1984, Cognition.

[94]  J. Sergent An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[95]  G. Assal,et al.  [Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals]. , 1984, Revue neurologique.

[96]  G. Rhodes Lateralized processes in face recognition. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[97]  E. Rolls,et al.  Selectivity between faces in the responses of a population of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey , 1985, Brain Research.

[98]  V. Bruce,et al.  Identity priming in the recognition of familiar faces. , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[99]  R. Flin,et al.  Development of face recognition: an encoding switch? , 1985, British journal of psychology.

[100]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[101]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[102]  P. Killeen The modularity of behavior , 1985, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[103]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[104]  T Valentine,et al.  The effect of race, inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[105]  E. Renzi Current Issues on Prosopagnosia , 1986 .

[106]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[107]  M. Endo Perception of Upside-Down Faces: An Analysis from the Viewpoint of Cue Saliency , 1986 .

[108]  A W Young,et al.  Naming and Categorizing Faces and Written Names , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[109]  A. Young,et al.  Face-name interference. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[110]  K. A. Kleiner Amplitude and phase spectra as indices of infants' pattern preferences. , 1986 .

[111]  Hemispheric Differences in the Evoked Potential to Face Stimuli , 1986 .

[112]  A. Young,et al.  Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression , 1986, Psychological research.

[113]  E. Warrington,et al.  Visual associative agnosia: a clinico-anatomical study of a single case. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[114]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Modelling the recognition of faces and words , 1987 .

[115]  B. A. Baldwin,et al.  Cells in temporal cortex of conscious sheep can respond preferentially to the sight of faces. , 1987, Science.

[116]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[117]  A. Damasio,et al.  The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[118]  R. Bruyer,et al.  Features of laterally displayed faces: saliency or top-down processing? , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[119]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces , 1987, Trends in Neurosciences.

[120]  Marie T. Banich,et al.  Face recognition: A general or specific right hemisphere capacity? , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[121]  A. Damasio,et al.  Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity , 1988, Neurology.

[122]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[123]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Cognition: Computational, Experimental, and Neuropsychological Perspectives , 1989 .

[124]  A. Young,et al.  ARE FACES SPECIAL , 1989 .

[125]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.

[126]  S. Levine THE QUESTION OF FACES: SPECIAL IS IN THE BRAIN OF THE BEHOLDER , 1989 .

[127]  D I Perrett,et al.  Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. , 1989, The Journal of experimental biology.

[128]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[129]  R. Campbell,et al.  Different Forms of Face-Knowledge Impairment , 1989 .

[130]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  FOUR WAYS FOR FACES TO BE ‘SPECIAL’ , 1989 .

[131]  N. Etcoff Recognition of emotions in patients with unilateral brain damage , 1989 .

[132]  D. Potter,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Facial Identity and Expression Processing , 1989 .

[133]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  On the properties of cognitive modules , 1990 .

[134]  R A Johnston,et al.  Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. , 1990, British journal of psychology.

[135]  A. Benton Facial Recognition 1990 , 1990, Cortex.

[136]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Modularity and neuropsychology: Modules and central processes in attention and memory. , 1990 .

[137]  A. Damasio,et al.  Face agnosia and the neural substrates of memory. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[138]  M. Farah Visual Agnosia: Disorders of Object Recognition and What They Tell Us about Normal Vision , 1990 .

[139]  A. Cowey,et al.  Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[140]  E. Renzi,et al.  Apperceptive and Associative Forms of Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[141]  O. Koenig,et al.  Separable Mechanisms in Face Processing: Evidence from Hemispheric Specialization , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[142]  F. Newcombe,et al.  Covert and overt recognition in prosopagnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[143]  V. Bruce,et al.  Remembering facial configurations , 1991, Cognition.

[144]  M. Harries,et al.  Visual Processing of Faces in Temporal Cortex: Physiological Evidence for a Modular Organization and Possible Anatomical Correlates , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[145]  K. Kendrick How the sheep's brain controls the visual recognition of animals and humans. , 1991, Journal of animal science.

[146]  A. Young,et al.  Perceptual categories and the computation of “grandmother” , 1991 .

[147]  M J Farah,et al.  Second-order relational properties and the inversion effect: Testing a theory of face perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[148]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[149]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[150]  M. Yoshida,et al.  Apparent reduction in the size of one side of the face associated with a small retrosplenial haemorrhage. , 1991, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[151]  A. Young,et al.  Dissociable face processing impairments after brain injury. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[152]  R. Desimone Face-Selective Cells in the Temporal Cortex of Monkeys , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[153]  J. Vroomen,et al.  Face recognition and lip-reading in autism , 1991 .

[154]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[155]  S. Zeki The visual image in mind and brain. , 1992, Scientific American.

[156]  A. Cowey,et al.  The role of the 'face-cell' area in the discrimination and recognition of faces by monkeys. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[157]  A W Ellis,et al.  Repetition Priming Follows Spontaneous but not Prompted Recognition of Familiar Faces , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[158]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[159]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[160]  M. Farah Is an Object an Object an Object? Cognitive and Neuropsychological Investigations of Domain Specificity in Visual Object Recognition , 1992 .

[161]  D. Benson,et al.  Prosopagnosia: a bihemispheric disorder. , 1992 .

[162]  J Sergent,et al.  Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing: evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[163]  Recognition memory for words and faces in schoolchildren: A female advantage for words , 1993 .

[164]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Configural Coding, Expertise, and the Right Hemisphere Advantage for Face Recognition , 1993, Brain and Cognition.

[165]  Broken brains and normal minds: why Humpty-Dumpty needs a skeleton , 1993 .

[166]  A. Young,et al.  Face-Processing Impairments and the Capgras Delusion , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[167]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The Simon Then Garfunkel Effect: Semantic Priming, Sensitivity, and the Modularity of Face Recognition , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[168]  J. A. Horel Retrieval of a face discrimination during suppression of monkey temporal cortex with cold , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[169]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[170]  L. D. Kartsounis,et al.  Selective Impairment of Retrieving People's Names: A Category Specific Disorder? , 1993, Cortex.

[171]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Inversion and Configuration of Faces , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[172]  G. Rhodes,et al.  What's lost in inverted faces? , 1993, Cognition.

[173]  A. Cowey,et al.  Visual discrimination impairments following lesions of the superior temporal sulcus are not specific for facial stimuli , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[174]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[175]  M Behrmann,et al.  Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[176]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces , 1994, Perception.

[177]  T. Allison,et al.  Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[178]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.