Registry of implants for the reconstruction of pelvic floor in males and females: A feasibility case series.

[1]  T. Ecke,et al.  Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Trial for Mesh Optimization by Autologous Plasma Coating in Prolapse Repair: IDEAL Stage 3 , 2017, Advances in Therapy.

[2]  R. Agha,et al.  Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines. , 2016, International journal of surgery.

[3]  Bruce Campbell,et al.  IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[4]  J. O. Daly.  Vaginal mesh products: each an entity unto itself , 2016, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[5]  M. Barber,et al.  Erratum to: An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) , 2016, International Urogynecology Journal.

[6]  M. Barber,et al.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) , 2016, International Urogynecology Journal.

[7]  M. Boros,et al.  Implants in Urogynecology , 2015, BioMed research international.

[8]  V. Bini,et al.  The S.A.C.S. (Satisfaction–Anatomy–Continence–Safety) score for evaluating pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a proposal for an outcome-based scoring system , 2015, International Urogynecology Journal.

[9]  H. Gerullis,et al.  Coating of Mesh Grafts for Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence Repair with Autologous Plasma: Exploration Stage of a Surgical Innovation , 2014, BioMed research international.

[10]  M. Medl,et al.  Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry , 2014, International Urogynecology Journal.

[11]  H. Gerullis,et al.  Systematic review and classification of complications after anterior, posterior, apical, and total vaginal mesh implantation for prolapse repair. , 2014, Surgical technology international.

[12]  H. Gerullis,et al.  IDEAL in Meshes for Prolapse, Urinary Incontinence, and Hernia Repair , 2013, Surgical innovation.

[13]  M. Löfgren,et al.  Female urinary incontinence: patient-reported outcomes 1 year after midurethral sling operations , 2012, International Urogynecology Journal.

[14]  G. Campanelli,et al.  EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair , 2012, Hernia.

[15]  A. Wein.  Re: FDA Safety Communication: Update on Serious Complications Associated With Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse , 2011 .

[16]  P. Wara,et al.  Long-term follow-up of laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia using a bilayer mesh with a slit , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  David W. Taggart,et al.  No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations , 2009, The Lancet.

[18]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[19]  J. Deprest,et al.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) / International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.