Rater source factors represent important subcomponents of the criterion construct space, not rater bias

[1]  Huy Le,et al.  Implications of Methodological Advances for the Practice of Personnel Selection: How Practitioners Benefit from Meta-analysis , 2007 .

[2]  Inga Carboni,et al.  On Measuring Individual Knowledge in Organizations , 2007 .

[3]  Adam W. Meade,et al.  A Monte Carlo Investigation of Assessment Center Construct Validity Models , 2007 .

[4]  Jeri Benson,et al.  Developing a Strong Program of Construct Validation: A Test Anxiety Example , 2005 .

[5]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[6]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: a multitrait-multirater approach. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  James W. Smither,et al.  DOES PERFORMANCE IMPROVE FOLLOWING MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK? A THEORETICAL MODEL, META‐ANALYSIS, AND REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL FINDINGS , 2005 .

[8]  Steven E. Scullen,et al.  Bias in the Correlated Uniqueness Model for MTMM Data , 2004 .

[9]  J. A. Walsh,et al.  Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Trait and Source Effects in ADHD-Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity Measures Across a 3-Month Interval , 2003, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  The Restriction of Variance Hypothesis and Interrater Reliability and Agreement: Are Ratings from Multiple Sources Really Dissimilar? , 2003 .

[12]  Steven E. Scullen,et al.  A critique of the correlated trait-correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait-multimethod data. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[13]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  RELIABILITY IS NOT VALIDITY AND VALIDITY IS NOT RELIABILITY , 2000 .

[14]  Steven E. Scullen,et al.  Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  INTERRATER CORRELATIONS DO NOT ESTIMATE THE RELIABILITY OF JOB PERFORMANCE RATINGS , 2000 .

[16]  K. Murphy,et al.  PROGRESS IN PSYCHOMETRICS: CAN INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY CATCH UP? , 2000 .

[17]  D. W. Drewes,et al.  Beyond the Spearman-Brown: a structural approach to maximal reliability. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[18]  Michael Eid,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions , 2000 .

[19]  Jean-Léon Beauvois,et al.  Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves , 2000 .

[20]  J. Conway,et al.  Managerial Performance Development Constructs and Personality Correlates , 2000 .

[21]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Test Theory: A Unified Treatment , 1999 .

[22]  Katherine A. Karl,et al.  Maximizing the Value of 360-Degree Feedback , 1998 .

[23]  William H. Glick,et al.  Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? , 1998 .

[24]  Sarah A. Hezlett,et al.  TRAIT, RATER AND LEVEL EFFECTS IN 360‐DEGREE PERFORMANCE RATINGS , 1998 .

[25]  J. Conway.  Understanding Method Variance in Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal Matrices: Examples Using General Impressions and Interpersonal Affect as Measured Method Factors , 1998 .

[26]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. , 1997 .

[27]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  360° ratings: An analysis of assumptions and a research agenda for evaluating their validity , 1997 .

[28]  D. P. Bozeman,et al.  Interrater agreement in multi‐source performance appraisal: a commentary , 1997 .

[29]  A. H. Church,et al.  Advancing the State of the Art of 360-Degree Feedback , 1997 .

[30]  J. P. Craiger,et al.  Effectiveness of the direct product versus confirmatory factor model for reflecting the structure of multimethod-multirater job performance data. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  John W. Fleenor,et al.  Self-other rating agreement and leader effectiveness , 1996 .

[32]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings , 1996 .

[33]  Nicholas J. Mathys,et al.  Human Resource Planning : A Pragmatic Approach to Manpower Staffing and Development , 1996 .

[34]  J. Conway,et al.  Analysis and Design of Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal Studies , 1996 .

[35]  James W. Smither,et al.  CAN MULTI-SOURCE FEEDBACK CHANGE PERCEPTIONS OF GOAL ACCOMPLISHMENT, SELF-EVALUATIONS, AND PERFORMANCE-RELATED OUTCOMES? THEORY-BASED APPLICATIONS AND DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH , 1995 .

[36]  S. Messick.  Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[37]  David J. Woehr,et al.  Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review , 1994 .

[38]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Additive and Multiplicative Method Effects in Applied Psychological Research: An Empirical Assessment of Three Models , 1994 .

[39]  Walter W. Tornow,et al.  Perceptions or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? , 1993 .

[40]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  More Progress Toward a Taxonomy of Managerial Performance Requirements , 1993 .

[41]  Donald T. Campbell,et al.  Citations do not solve problems. , 1992 .

[42]  Charles E. Lance,et al.  Specification of the criterion construct space: An application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. , 1992 .

[43]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Analysis of the multitrait^multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis , 1992 .

[44]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Estimation Problems in the Block-Diagonal Model of the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix , 1990 .

[45]  Barry R. Nathan,et al.  The consequences of halo "error" in performance ratings: A field study of the moderating effect of halo on test validation results. , 1990 .

[46]  John P. Campbell,et al.  MODELING JOB PERFORMANCE IN A POPULATION OF JOBS , 1990 .

[47]  H. Marsh.  Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: Many Problems and a Few Solutions , 1989 .

[48]  Irwin L. Goldstein,et al.  Training and Development in Organizations , 1989 .

[49]  Cynthia D. McCauley,et al.  Diagnosing Management Development Needs: An Instrument Based on How Managers Develop , 1989 .

[50]  D. Lehmann.  An Alternative Procedure for Assessing Convergent and Discriminant Validity , 1988 .

[51]  Sebastiano A. Fisicaro,et al.  A Reexamination of the Relation Between Halo Error and Accuracy , 1988 .

[52]  John Schaubroeck,et al.  A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. , 1988 .

[53]  M. Coovert,et al.  Construct validity of multiple job performance measures using confirmatory factor analysis. , 1988 .

[54]  H. Marsh,et al.  A new, more powerful approach to multitrait-multimethod analyses: Application of second-order confirmatory factor analysis. , 1988 .

[55]  K. Widaman.  Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 1985 .

[56]  W. Swann,et al.  Quest for accuracy in person perception: a matter of pragmatics. , 1984, Psychological review.

[57]  M. Browne,et al.  The decomposition of multitrait-multimethod matrices. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[58]  R. Baron,et al.  Toward an Ecological Theory of Social Perception , 1983 .

[59]  Robert J. Wherry,et al.  THE CONTROL OF BIAS IN RATINGS: A THEORY OF RATING , 1982 .

[60]  A. R. Bass,et al.  A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF STUDIES COMPARING BEHAVIORALLY ANCHORED RATING SCALES (BARS) AND OTHER RATING FORMATS , 1981 .

[61]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Halo in a multidimensional forced-choice performance evaluation scale. , 1980 .

[62]  R. Downey,et al.  Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data , 1980 .

[63]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Statistical approaches to the correction of correlational bias , 1980 .

[64]  J. A. Woodward,et al.  Inequalities among lower bounds to reliability: With applications to test construction and factor analysis , 1980 .

[65]  Robert L. Holzbach,et al.  Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings. , 1978 .

[66]  W. Avison.  Auxiliary Theory and Multitrait-Multimethod Validation: A Review of Two Approaches , 1978 .

[67]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Path Analysis of Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices , 1978 .

[68]  S. Golding,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES: A TWO STEP PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS PROCEDURE. , 1974, Multivariate behavioral research.

[69]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach , 1974 .

[70]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Role of the rater in performance appraisal. , 1974 .

[71]  Nicholas Imparato,et al.  Development of behaviorally anchored rating scales as a function of organizational level. , 1974 .

[72]  S. Zedeck,et al.  Nursing performance as measured by behavioral expectation scales: A multitrait-multirater analysis , 1972 .

[73]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[74]  R. Boruch,et al.  Alternative Methods of Analysis: Multitrait-Multimethod Data , 1970 .

[75]  D T Campbell,et al.  Methods Factors In Multitrait-Multimethod Matrices : Multiplicative Rather Than Additive? , 1967, Multivariate behavioral research.

[76]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  J. Gibson.  Book Reviews: The Perception of the Visual World , 1950 .

[78]  W. V. Bingham.  Halo, invalid and valid. , 1939 .

[79]  Brian J. Hoffman.  Disentangling the Meaning of Multisource Feedback: An Examination of the Nomological Network Surrounding Source and Dimension Factors , 2006 .

[80]  Winston Bennett,et al.  Performance Measurement : Current Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2006 .

[81]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A meta-analytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[82]  T. Judge,et al.  The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[83]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[84]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[85]  Werner Wothke,et al.  Covariance components analysis of the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1995 .

[86]  S. Fiske,et al.  Personality Research, Methods, and Theory : A Festschrift Honoring Donald W. Fiske , 1995 .

[87]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Productivity in Organizations , 1995 .

[88]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Job behavior, performance, and effectiveness. , 1991 .

[89]  C. Lance,et al.  Cognitive categorization processes in performance evaluation: Confirmatory tests of two models , 1991 .

[90]  John P. Campbell,et al.  Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[91]  David A. Cole,et al.  Evaluating change due to training. , 1989 .

[92]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Assessing training needs: Critical levels of analysis. , 1989 .

[93]  D. Funder,et al.  Errors and mistakes: evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  Charles E. Lance,et al.  Statistical control of halo: Clarification from two cognitive models of the performance appraisal process. , 1986 .

[95]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[96]  Michael J. Kavanagh,et al.  Issues in managerial performance: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of ratings. , 1971 .

[97]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.