A Novel Method to Predict Knee Osteoarthritis Progression on MRI Using Machine Learning Methods

This paper explored the hidden biomedical information from knee magnetic resonance (MR) images for osteoarthritis (OA) prediction. We have computed the cartilage damage index (CDI) information from 36 informative locations on tibiofemoral cartilage compartment from 3-D MR imaging and used principal component analysis (PCA) analysis to process the feature set. Four machine learning methods (artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine, random forest, and naïve Bayes) were employed to predict the progression of OA, which was measured by the change of Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grade, Joint Space Narrowing on Medial compartment (JSM) grade, and Joint Space Narrowing on Lateral compartment (JSL) grade. To examine the different effects of medial and lateral informative locations, we have divided the 36-D feature set into a 18-D medial feature set and a 18-D lateral feature set and run the experiment on four classifiers separately. Experiment results showed that the medial feature set generated better prediction performance than the lateral feature set, while using the total 36-D feature set generated the best. PCA analysis is helpful in feature space reduction and performance improvement. For KL grade prediction, the best performance was achieved by ANN with AUC = 0.761 and F-measure = 0.714. For JSM grade prediction, the best performance was achieved by random forest with AUC = 0.785 and F-measure = 0.743, while for JSL grade prediction, the best performance was achieved by ANN with AUC = 0.695 and F-measure = 0.796. As experiment results showing that the informative locations on medial compartment provide more distinguishing features than informative locations on the lateral compartment, it could be considered to select more points from the medial compartment while reducing the number of points from the lateral compartment to improve clinical CDI design.

[1]  David Felson,et al.  Varus and valgus alignment and incident and progressive knee osteoarthritis , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  Jeffrey B Driban,et al.  Development of a rapid knee cartilage damage quantification method using magnetic resonance images , 2014, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[3]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Automatic Segmentation and Quantitative Analysis of the Articular Cartilages From Magnetic Resonance Images of the Knee , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  C. H. Coyle,et al.  Early diagnosis to enable early treatment of pre-osteoarthritis , 2012, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[5]  Jeffrey B. Driban,et al.  Effect of Intra-articular Triamcinolone vs Saline on Knee Cartilage Volume and Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

[6]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis , 2016, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[7]  F Eckstein,et al.  Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[8]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning internal representations by error propagation , 1986 .

[9]  U. Sinha,et al.  Automated image processing and analysis of cartilage MRI: enabling technology for data mining applied to osteoarthritis. , 2007, AIP conference proceedings.

[10]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Quantitative Cartilage Imaging in Knee Osteoarthritis , 2010, Arthritis.

[11]  C. Kwoh,et al.  Knee cartilage: efficient and reproducible segmentation on high-spatial-resolution MR images with the semiautomated graph-cut algorithm method. , 2009, Radiology.

[12]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[13]  Yuqing Zhang,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. , 2013, Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America.

[14]  Rita W. T. Cheng,et al.  Reliability of an efficient MRI-based method for estimation of knee cartilage volume using surface registration. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  Jeffrey B. Driban,et al.  Development of a Rapid Cartilage Damage Quantification Method for the Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Using Magnetic Resonance Images: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative , 2015, BioMed research international.

[16]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Longitudinal study of the relationship between knee angle and tibiofemoral cartilage volume in subjects with knee osteoarthritis. , 2004, Rheumatology.

[17]  Toby King,et al.  The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. , 2016, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  D. Hand,et al.  Idiot's Bayes—Not So Stupid After All? , 2001 .

[19]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis , 2014, ArXiv.

[20]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  LOGISMOS—Layered Optimal Graph Image Segmentation of Multiple Objects and Surfaces: Cartilage Segmentation in the Knee Joint , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[22]  Richard I Kitney,et al.  Automated techniques for visualization and mapping of articular cartilage in MR images of the osteoarthritic knee: a base technique for the assessment of microdamage and submicro damage. , 2002, IEEE transactions on nanobioscience.

[23]  Ming Zhang,et al.  Knee osteoarthritis prediction on MR images using cartilage damage index and machine learning methods , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM).

[24]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[25]  Dinesh Bhatia,et al.  Current interventions in the management of knee osteoarthritis , 2013, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[26]  L. D. Bennett,et al.  Meniscal and articular cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional double-contrast macroradiographic study. , 2002, Rheumatology.