Effect of Hole Transport Materials and Their Dopants on the Stability and Recoverability of Perovskite Solar Cells on Very Thin Substrates after 7 MeV Proton Irradiation

The drastic reduction in launch and manufacturing costs of space hardware has facilitated the emergence of "commercial" space. Radiation‐hard organometal halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) with low‐cost and high‐efficiency potentials are promising for space applications.High‐efficiency PSCs are tested with different hole transport materials (HTMs) and dopants on 175µm sapphire substrates under 7MeV‐proton‐irradiation‐tests at accumulated fluences of 1011, 1012, and 1013 protons cm−2. While all cells retain >90% of their initial power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) after 1011 protons cm−2 irradiation, PSCs that have tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane (TPFB) as the HTM dopant and poly[bis(4‐phenyl)(2,5,6‐trimethylphenyl) amine (PTAA) or PTAA:C8BTBT (C8BTBT = 2,7‐Dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3,2‐b][1]benzothiophene) as the HTM are more tolerant to higher‐fluence radiation than their counterparts with the lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) dopant and the 2,2′,7,7′‐Tetrakis[N,N‐di(4‐methoxyphenyl)amino]‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (Spiro‐OMeTAD) HTM. Radiation induces fluorine diffusion from the LiTFSI dopant toward the perovskite absorber (confirmed by depth‐resolved X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy) introducing defects. Radiation‐induced defects in cells with the TPFB dopant instead are different and can be “annealed out” by thermal vacuum resulting in PCE recovery. This is the first report using thermal admittance spectroscopy and deep‐level transient spectroscopy for defect analyses on proton‐irradiated and thermal‐vacuum‐recovered PSCs. The insights generated are expected to contribute to efforts in developing low‐cost light‐weight solar cells for space applications.

[1]  Yongqi Liang,et al.  Property degradation of mixed-cation perovskite films and solar cells irradiated with protons , 2022, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

[2]  M. Alurralde,et al.  Evaluation of the resistance of halide perovskite solar cells to high energy proton irradiation for space applications , 2022, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells.

[3]  Thuc‐Quyen Nguyen,et al.  Understanding the p-doping of spiro-OMeTAD by tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane , 2022, Electrochimica Acta.

[4]  Ahmad R. Kirmani,et al.  Countdown to perovskite space launch: Guidelines to performing relevant radiation-hardness experiments , 2022, Joule.

[5]  Bryan T. Tuten,et al.  Are Metal Halide Perovskite Solar Cells Ready for Space Applications? , 2022, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[6]  Philip Schulz,et al.  In-Depth Chemical and Optoelectronic Analysis of Triple-Cation Perovskite Thin Films by Combining XPS Profiling and PL Imaging. , 2022, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[7]  D. Bhattacharyya,et al.  Deployment Opportunities for Space Photovoltaics and the Prospects for Perovskite Solar Cells , 2021, Advanced Materials Technologies.

[8]  Licheng Sun,et al.  Interfacial Defect Passivation and Charge Carrier Management for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells via a Highly Crystalline Polymer , 2021, ACS Energy Letters.

[9]  J. Barbé,et al.  Proton Radiation Hardness of Perovskite Solar Cells Utilizing a Mesoporous Carbon Electrode , 2021, Energy Technology.

[10]  M. Green,et al.  Recent progress and future prospects of perovskite tandem solar cells , 2021, Applied Physics Reviews.

[11]  H. Neitzert,et al.  Proton‐Radiation Tolerant All‐Perovskite Multijunction Solar Cells , 2021, Advanced Energy Materials.

[12]  C. Brabec,et al.  Device Performance of Emerging Photovoltaic Materials (Version 2) , 2021, Advanced Energy Materials.

[13]  Xiaoji G. Xu,et al.  Liquid medium annealing for fabricating durable perovskite solar cells with improved reproducibility , 2021, Science.

[14]  G. Eperon,et al.  Tolerance of Perovskite Solar Cells to Targeted Proton Irradiation and Electronic Ionization Induced Healing , 2021 .

[15]  S. Cakaj The Parameters Comparison of the “Starlink” LEO Satellites Constellation for Different Orbital Shells , 2021, Frontiers in Communications and Networks.

[16]  Q. Gong,et al.  Perovskite Solar Cells for Space Applications: Progress and Challenges , 2021, Advanced materials.

[17]  K. Catchpole,et al.  A bottom‐up cost analysis of silicon–perovskite tandem photovoltaics , 2020, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications.

[18]  John S. Bangsund,et al.  Formation of Stable Metal Halide Perovskite/Perovskite Heterojunctions , 2020, ACS Energy Letters.

[19]  A. Ho-baillie,et al.  Progress and Opportunities for Cs Incorporated Perovskite Photovoltaics , 2020 .

[20]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analyses of encapsulated stable perovskite solar cells , 2020, Science.

[21]  G. Landi,et al.  Proton Radiation Hardness of Perovskite Tandem Photovoltaics , 2020, Joule.

[22]  Furkan H. Isikgor,et al.  Lewis-Acid Doping of Triphenylamine-Based Hole Transport Materials Improves the Performance and Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells. , 2020, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[23]  Hongzheng Chen,et al.  Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Small Molecular Hole Transport Material C 8 ‐Dioctylbenzothienobenzothiophene , 2019, Chinese Journal of Chemistry.

[24]  K. Hirose,et al.  Proton Irradiation Tolerance of High Efficiency Perovskite Absorbers for Space Applications. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[25]  Matthew J. Carnie,et al.  Radiation Hardness of Perovskite Solar Cells Based on Aluminum‐Doped Zinc Oxide Electrode Under Proton Irradiation , 2019, Solar RRL.

[26]  Yongli Gao,et al.  Cation and anion immobilization through chemical bonding enhancement with fluorides for stable halide perovskite solar cells , 2019, Nature Energy.

[27]  Kelsey A. W. Horowitz,et al.  A Techno-Economic Analysis and Cost Reduction Roadmap for III-V Solar Cells , 2018 .

[28]  A. Di Carlo,et al.  Aging effects in interface-engineered perovskite solar cells with 2D nanomaterials: A depth profile analysis , 2018, Materials Today Energy.

[29]  T. Ohshima,et al.  Tolerance of Perovskite Solar Cell to High-Energy Particle Irradiations in Space Environment , 2018, iScience.

[30]  Ulrich Fischer,et al.  Evaluation of effective threshold displacement energies and other data required for the calculation of advanced atomic displacement cross-sections , 2017 .

[31]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  A manufacturing cost estimation method with uncertainty analysis and its application to perovskite on glass photovoltaic modules , 2017 .

[32]  M. Green,et al.  An effective method of predicting perovskite solar cell lifetime–Case study on planar CH3NH3PbI3 and HC(NH2)2PbI3 perovskite solar cells and hole transfer materials of spiro-OMeTAD and PTAA , 2017 .

[33]  Michio Tajima,et al.  Radiation degradation characteristics of component subcells in inverted metamorphic triple‐junction solar cells irradiated with electrons and protons , 2017 .

[34]  G. Landi,et al.  Defect Dynamics in Proton Irradiated CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Solar Cells , 2017 .

[35]  G. Landi,et al.  Radiation Hardness and Self‐Healing of Perovskite Solar Cells , 2016, Advanced materials.

[36]  S. Elhadj,et al.  Modulus of Elasticity and Thermal Expansion Coefficient of ITO Film , 2016 .

[37]  R. Stoller,et al.  On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure , 2013 .

[38]  Jeffrey H. Warner,et al.  Using SRIM to calculate the relative damage coefficients for solar cells , 2005 .

[39]  C. Giori,et al.  Space Radiation Resistant Transparent Polymeric Materials. , 1977 .

[40]  R. H. Hansen,et al.  Effect of atomic oxygen on polymers , 1965 .

[41]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Manufacturing cost and market potential analysis of demonstrated roll-to-roll perovskite photovoltaic cell processes , 2018 .

[42]  J. R. Carter,et al.  Solar cell radiation handbook , 1989 .