Multisensory interface design for drivers: past, present and future

A number of recent studies have started to break down the costs associated with using a mobile phone while driving into a number of relatively separable cognitive components.Drivers find it difficult to divide their attention spatially between different locations (i.e. when trying to listen to the side while simultaneously attending visually to the front), something that has often been shown to cause people problems in laboratory settings . Meanwhile,laboratory-based research has shown that participants’ performance in a simulated driving task was significantly impaired when the experimenter simultaneously engaged them in a cognitively-demanding discussion of current affairs. Overall, the research suggests that the more demandingthe auditory task (or conversation), the larger the impairment that will be observed on driving performance. It is interesting to note that the results of a recent meta-analysis of 23 different studies has shown that the costs associated with using a mobile phone while driving are primarily seen in reaction time tasks, with far smaller costs being associated with performance on lane keeping or tracking tasks.Although it is often suggested that using a mobile phone while driving may actually be no more dangerous than either talking to a passenger or listening to the car radio, the evidence now shows that both of these activities appear to result in a significant impairment of several aspects of driving performance. It will be important for future studies to try and move away from the overly-simplified laboratory-based simulated driving tests that have characterised much of the research conducted to date, to more realistic driving simulator or on-road studies. (A)

[1]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Todd Mondor,et al.  Judging the urgency of non-verbal auditory alarms: a case study , 2004, Ergonomics.

[3]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[4]  C. Spence,et al.  The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention , 2006, Ergonomics.

[5]  E. Poulton,et al.  MEASURING THE SPARE ‘MENTAL CAPACITY ’OF CAR DRIVERS BY A SUBSIDIARY TASK , 1961 .

[6]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Integrating Vehicle Design and Human Factors: Minimizing Elderly Driving Constraints , 2001 .

[7]  J. V. Erp,et al.  Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system , 2004 .

[8]  J. F. Corso,et al.  Sensory processes and age effects in normal adults. , 1971, Journal of gerontology.

[9]  C. Spence,et al.  Speech Shadowing While Driving , 2003, Psychological science.

[10]  C K T Sri Frederic Bartlett,et al.  ERGONOMICS RESEARCH SOCIETY: THE SOCIETY'S LECTURE 1962 Given at Loughborough, 9 April THE FUTURE FOR ERGONOMICS , 1962 .

[11]  Thomas K. Ferris,et al.  The Implications of Crossmodal Links in Attention for the Design of Multimodal Interfaces: A Driving Simulation Study , 2006 .

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Valdimar Briem,et al.  Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. , 1995 .

[15]  P F Waller,et al.  The Older Driver , 1991, Human factors.

[16]  M. Woodward,et al.  The prevalence of, and factors associated with, serious crashes involving a distracting activity. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[18]  Matthew P. Reed,et al.  Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task , 1999 .

[19]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  The Need for Multisensory Interfaces in Support of Effective Attention Allocation in Highly Dynamic Event-Driven Domains: The Case of Cockpit Automation , 2000 .

[20]  Y C Liu,et al.  Comparative study of the effects of auditory, visual and multimodality displays on drivers' performance in advanced traveller information systems , 2001, Ergonomics.

[21]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[23]  I. Brown,et al.  Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  M. Sivak The Information That Drivers Use: Is it Indeed 90% Visual? , 1996, Perception.

[25]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Structure of Attentional Resources , 1980 .

[26]  D F Blake,et al.  The ice of life. , 2001, Scientific American.

[27]  H. Beh,et al.  Performance on driving-related tasks during music , 1999 .

[28]  Jon Driver,et al.  Crossmodal Spatial Attention: Evidence from Human Performance , 2004 .

[29]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[30]  Suzanne P McEvoy,et al.  The contribution of passengers versus mobile phone use to motor vehicle crashes resulting in hospital attendance by the driver. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  M. Wallace,et al.  Enhanced multisensory integration in older adults , 2006, Neurobiology of Aging.

[32]  Julie Thomas,et al.  Attention aware systems: Theories, applications, and research agenda , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Erik Hollnagel The Future of Ergonomics , 2001 .

[34]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  R Graham,et al.  Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[36]  S Ashley,et al.  Driving the info highway. , 2001, Scientific American.

[37]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving , 2008 .

[38]  S J Westerman,et al.  Mobile (cellular) phone use and driving: a critical review of research methodology , 2001, Ergonomics.

[39]  J. V. Van Erp,et al.  Presenting directions with a vibrotactile torso display , 2005, Ergonomics.

[40]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  COGNITIVE DEMANDS OF HANDS-FREE-PHONE CONVERSATION WHILE DRIVING , 2002 .

[41]  Ken R Catchpole,et al.  Localizable auditory warning pulses , 2004, Ergonomics.

[42]  Jon Driver,et al.  Cross-modal links in attention between audition, vision, and touch: Implications for interface design , 1997 .

[43]  T Falkmer,et al.  Effect of drivers' age and push button locations on visual time off road, steering wheel deviation and safety perception , 2006, Ergonomics.

[44]  Charles Spence,et al.  Multisensory cues capture spatial attention regardless of perceptual load. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  Brian F. Goldiez,et al.  A Paradigm Shift in Interactive Computing: Deriving Multimodal Design Principles from Behavioral and Neurological Foundations , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[46]  Warren Brodsky,et al.  The effects of music tempo on simulated driving performance and vehicular control , 2001 .

[47]  I D Brown Effect of a car radio on driving in traffic. , 1965, Ergonomics.