Wear analysis of retrieved ceramic-on-ceramic articulations in total hip arthroplasty: Femoral head makes contact with the rim of the socket outside of the bearing surface.

We investigated articular bearing surfaces retrieved from three patients with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties using high-quality alumina. The duration of implantation was 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5 years, respectively. Dislocation of the hip joint after implantation did not occur in any patients. The retrieved prostheses were examined by stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In the main load-bearing area, no wear marks were seen in any sockets. However, in all three cases, stripe scars were observed at the rim of the alumina inlay under stereomicroscopy, despite the lack of indentation in the socket and the stem, which suggests impingement. Such scars were not observed on the load-bearing surface. Under SEM, the scars showed excessive wear, including material excavation, that has not been observed in conventional hip simulator experiments. These findings are similar to those of experiments in which a simulator was programmed to distract the femoral head from the socket. The present results suggest that the femoral head can separate from the socket without neck-socket impingement in vivo.

[1]  J. Fisher,et al.  Comparative analysis of two different types of alumina-alumina hip prosthesis retrieved for aseptic loosening. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  J Fisher,et al.  Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  P. T. Nielsen,et al.  Fracture of ceramic femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  D A Dennis,et al.  "In vivo" determination of hip joint separation and the forces generated due to impact loading conditions. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M. Rainforth,et al.  Examination of Alumina Ceramic Components from Total Hip Arthroplasties , 1993, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  J. Garino Modern Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Systems in the United States: Early Results , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  M. Boehler,et al.  Long-term results of uncemented alumina acetabular implants. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  P. Christel,et al.  Wear analysis of retrieved alumina heads and sockets of hip prostheses. , 1989, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[9]  Laurent Sedel,et al.  Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum 18.5-Year Follow-up Study , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  E. Magnissalis,et al.  Wear of retrieved ceramic THA components--four matched pairs retrieved after 5-13 years in service. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[11]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Wear, Friction, and Mechanical Investigation and Development of Alumina-to-Alumina Combination Total Hip Joint , 1999 .

[12]  Jorge A Ochoa,et al.  In Vivo Comparison of Hip Separation After Metal-on-Metal or Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  A. Roquancourt,et al.  The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  M. Gleitz,et al.  Ceramic Femoral Head Fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  J Fisher,et al.  Analysis of retrieved alumina ceramic components from Mittelmeier total hip prostheses. , 1999, Biomaterials.