Assessing women's preferences for intrapartum care.

BACKGROUND Recent government reports have recommended involving consumers in the planning of health services. Although satisfaction surveys have traditionally been used, they have several limitations. This paper describes a relatively new method of eliciting consumer preferences that allows respondents (women) to indicate the importance that they attribute to specific aspects of a service. The aim was to explore the feasibility of using a discrete choice experiment to assess the importance to women of different aspects of intrapartum care. METHODS In this pilot study of 301 women at low obstetric risk, data were collected using an anonymous self-complete questionnaire given to each participant by the midwife at the booking visit. RESULTS The results of the regression model suggest that respondents prefer maternity units that offer greater continuity of caregiver, more methods of pain relief, continuous fetal heart rate monitoring, a homely appearance, routine involvement of medical staff, and greater involvement for the woman in the decision-making process. Although all attributes were important to women, they were not all of equal importance. For example, if continuity of caregiver were achieved at the expense of decreasing the availability of pain relief then women would be worse off. CONCLUSIONS The discrete choice experiment appears to be a useful tool in assessing the strength of women's preferences for different aspects of maternity care. Future research should include a qualitative approach to explore in greater depth the processes involved in shaping women's preferences.

[1]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[2]  D. Sharp British Broadcasting Corporation , 1984 .

[3]  C. Wolfe,et al.  Consumers' views of the maternity services: implications for change and quality assurance. , 1991, Journal of public health medicine.

[4]  L. Nazarko Continuing care. , 1998, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[5]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. , 1997, Health economics.

[6]  Sheila C. Hunt,et al.  The Social Meaning of Midwifery , 1995 .

[7]  M Ryan,et al.  Methodological issues in the application of conjoint analysis in health care. , 1998, Health economics.

[8]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. , 1991, BMJ.

[9]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[10]  C. Jagger,et al.  Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial , 1993, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  D. Locker,et al.  Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care. , 1978, Social science & medicine.

[12]  A. Jacoby Women's preferences for and satisfaction with current procedures in childbirth--findings from a national study. , 1987, Midwifery.

[13]  V. Hundley,et al.  Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care , 1994, BMJ.

[14]  Hj Norussis,et al.  SPSS for Windows , 1993 .

[15]  M Ryan,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  M. Bone Surveys of patient satisfaction. , 1991, BMJ.

[17]  W. Graham,et al.  A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland. , 2000, Midwifery.

[18]  M. Ryan,et al.  The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia , 2000, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[19]  W. Graham,et al.  Women's priorities for care before and after delivery , 1998 .

[20]  C. Propper The Disutility of Time Spent on the United Kingdom's National Health Service Waiting Lists , 1995 .

[21]  M. Avis,et al.  Satisfying solutions? A review of some unresolved issues in the measurement of patient satisfaction. , 1995, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  J. Sandall Midwives' burnout and continuity of care , 1997 .

[23]  A. Macfarlane,et al.  Evaluation of midwife-led care provided at the Royal Bournemouth Hospital. , 1999, Midwifery.

[24]  Melanie Brazil,et al.  Drug delivery: First class delivery , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.