Effects of echo time variation on perfusion assessment using dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging at 3 tesla.

The implications of changing the echo time of a gradient-echo echo planar imaging sequence applied to dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) for perfusion imaging at 3T were investigated. Four echo times in the range of 21 to 45 ms were examined in a total of 17 patients who received a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg bodyweight Gadobutrol (Gadovist, 1.0 mmol/ml). As the primary optimization parameter, the concentration-to-noise ratio (SNRc) was selected as it takes effects of variations in baseline as well as in signal drop into account. In an analysis of gray matter, white matter and arterial regions of interest, SNRc showed the highest values for the shortest applied echo time in all cases. Maps of regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and blood flow (rCBF) were calculated using deconvolution based on singular value decomposition. The quality of rCBF and rCBV images was judged to be good or excellent in all cases, independent of the echo time. Calculated gray matter/white matter ratios of rCBF and rCBV displayed no significant dependence on the applied echo time. Considering the better SNRc and arterial signal saturation aspects, we found that the shortest investigated echo time was the superior one. We thus suggest that short echo times should be applied, taking technical limitations and clinical demands into consideration.

[1]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  CBF and CBV measurements by USPIO bolus tracking: Reproducibility and comparison with Gd‐based values , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  S. Felber,et al.  The Impact of Peak Saturation of the Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Evaluation of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MR Studies , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Brain MR perfusion imaging in humans: Advantages of high-molarity gadolinium chelates , 2001 .

[5]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Brain MR perfusion imaging in humans. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[6]  R. Frayne,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio effects in quantitative cerebral perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast agents , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  M. Shinohara,et al.  Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Jianfeng Gao,et al.  Cerebral blood flow measurement by dynamic contrast MRI using singular value decomposition with an adaptive threshold , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  T. Benner,et al.  Comparison of echo-planar sequences for perfusion-weighted MRI: which is best? , 1998, Neuroradiology.

[12]  B. Rosen,et al.  Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  B. Rosen,et al.  Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: Contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  N. Lassen,et al.  CEREBRAL HEMATOCRIT IN NORMAL MAN. , 1964, Journal of applied physiology.

[15]  B. Rosen,et al.  Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: Theory and experiment , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Leif Østergaard,et al.  Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Distributions in Normal Volunteers: Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Compared with 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  O Speck,et al.  Perfusion MRI of the human brain with dynamic susceptibility contrast: Gradient‐echo versus spin‐echo techniques , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.