Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known.

Statistical randomization tests in evolutionary biology often require a set of random, computer-generated trees. For example, earlier studies have shown how large numbers of computer-generated trees can be used to conduct phylogenetic comparative analyses even when the phylogeny is uncertain or unknown. These methods were limited, however, in that (in the absence of molecular sequence or other data) they allowed users to assume that no phylogenetic information was available or that all possible trees were known. Intermediate situations where only a taxonomy or other limited phylogenetic information (e.g., polytomies) are available are technically more difficult. The current study describes a procedure for generating random samples of phylogenies while incorporating limited phylogenetic information (e.g., four taxa belong together in a subclade). The procedure can be used to conduct comparative analyses when the phylogeny is only partially resolved or can be used in other randomization tests in which large numbers of possible phylogenies are needed.

[1]  C. J-F,et al.  THE COALESCENT , 1980 .

[2]  J. Hey USING PHYLOGENETIC TREES TO STUDY SPECIATION AND EXTINCTION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  A. Grafen The phylogenetic regression. , 1989, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree , 1991 .

[5]  Montgomery Slatkin,et al.  NULL MODELS FOR THE NUMBER OF EVOLUTIONARY STEPS IN A CHARACTER ON A PHYLOGENETIC TREE , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  The number of evolutionary trees , 1978 .

[7]  E. Abouheif RANDOM TREES AND THE COMPARATIVE METHOD: A CAUTIONARY TALE , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  Joseph B. Slowinski,et al.  Testing the Stochasticity of Patterns of Organismal Diversity: An Improved Null Model , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[9]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[10]  J. Losos An Approach to the Analysis of Comparative Data When a Phylogeny Is Unavailable or Incomplete , 1994 .

[11]  G. Furnas The generation of random, binary unordered trees , 1984 .

[12]  E. Martins CONDUCTING PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE STUDIES WHEN THE PHYLOGENY IS NOT KNOWN , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  Albert Nijenhuis,et al.  Combinatorial Algorithms for Computers and Calculators , 1978 .

[14]  C G Hopkins,et al.  A SIMPLE EXPLANATION. , 1917, Science.

[15]  J. Chu,et al.  A simple explanation for taxon abundance patterns. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[17]  A. Grafen The uniqueness of the phylogenetic regression , 1992 .

[18]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  M. Pagel A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[20]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  TRANSLATING BETWEEN MICROEVOLUTIONARY PROCESS AND MACROEVOLUTIONARY PATTERNS: THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF INTERSPECIFIC DATA , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  R. Page RANDOM DENDROGRAMS AND NULL HYPOTHESES IN CLADISTIC BIOGEOGRAPHY , 1991 .

[22]  T. F. Hansen STABILIZING SELECTION AND THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ADAPTATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  E. Martins The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology, Paul H. Harvey, Mark D. Pagel. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1991), vii, + 239 Price $24.95 paperback , 1992 .

[24]  D. Aldous Darwin's log: a toy model of speciation and extinction , 1995, Journal of Applied Probability.

[25]  Jon A Yamato,et al.  Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. , 1995, Genetics.

[26]  R. Hudson Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. , 1990 .

[27]  A. Rambaut,et al.  Phylogenetic extinction rates and comparative methodology , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  B Rannala,et al.  Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. , 2000, Science.