Facilitating Instructor Adoption of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics

Faculty development workshops are one strategy for increasing instructor use of evidence-based teaching practices that are known to improve student outcomes in mathematics and other STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) disciplines. Yet relatively little is known about the impact of professional development on teaching practice in higher education. We report findings on participant outcomes from a series of annual, weeklong professional development workshops for college mathematics instructors about Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) in undergraduate mathematics. We gathered data from surveys with the 139 workshop participants and interviews with a subset of 16 participants. These workshops were found to be effective in encouraging instructors to try this student-centered approach to teaching mathematics, as 58 % of participants reported implementing IBL strategies in the year following the workshop they attended. Analysis suggested that certain features of the workshops supported participants’ adoption of IBL strategies. The findings pointed to the importance of (1) sharing broad, inclusive definitions of IBL, (2) representing viewpoints and experiences from diverse institutional contexts, (3) allowing sufficient time within the workshop to explore and revisit topics, (4) addressing common concerns such as content coverage, student resistance, and skills to implement IBL, and (5) providing ongoing follow-up support and inclusion in the community of IBL practitioners. We also make connections with studies of the impact of instructional development in other STEM disciplines and share implications for effective professional development in general.

[1]  C. Henderson.  Promoting Instructional Change in New Faculty: An Evaluation of the Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshop , 2007 .

[2]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[3]  C. Henderson,et al.  Increasing the Impact and Diffusion of Stem Education Innovations , 2022 .

[4]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Taking Teaching Seriously: Meeting the Challenge of Instructional Improvement. ERIC Digest. , 1995 .

[5]  William S. Mahavier.  What is the Moore method , 1999 .

[6]  Marcel D'Eon,et al.  Using Self-Assessments to Detect Workshop Success , 2008 .

[7]  Jennifer A. Moon.  A Handbook of Reflective and Experiential Learning: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[8]  S. Laursen,et al.  Assessing Long-Term Effects of Inquiry-Based Learning: A Case Study from College Mathematics , 2014 .

[9]  Dylan Q. Retsek.  Chop Wood, Carry Water, Use Definitions: Survival Lessons of an IBL Rookie , 2013 .

[10]  Stan Yoshinobu,et al.  The Coverage Issue , 2012 .

[11]  Claire Howell Major,et al.  Foundations of Problem Based Learning , 2004 .

[12]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Taking Teaching Seriously: Meeting the Challenge of Instructional Improvement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1995. , 1995 .

[13]  Jeffrey E. Froyd,et al.  Successful propagation of educational innovations: Viewpoints from principal investigators and program , 2013 .

[14]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures , 2009 .

[15]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[16]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[17]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Elaine Seymour,et al.  Partners in Innovation: Teaching Assistants in College Science Courses , 2005 .

[19]  リミックス.  Microsoft Excel for Macintosh ver.5 , 1996 .

[20]  G. Edgar Parker,et al.  The Moore Method: A Pathway to Learner-Centered Instruction , 2009 .

[21]  Mark Connolly.  Using Workshops to Improve Instruction in STEM Courses , 2006 .

[22]  J. Fairweather,et al.  Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in Science , Technology , Engineering , and Mathematics ( STEM ) Undergraduate Education A Status Report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education , 2008 .

[23]  Ashley J. Welsh.  Exploring Undergraduates' Perceptions of the Use of Active Learning Techniques in Science Lectures. , 2012 .

[24]  Peter C. Cormas,et al.  The Effective Research-Based Characteristics of Professional Development of the National Science Foundation’s GK-12 Program , 2011 .

[25]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Perceived norms for interactive teaching and their relationship to instructional decision-making: a mixed methods study , 2012 .

[26]  C. Henderson,et al.  Physics Faculty and Educational Researchers: Divergent Expectations as Barriers to the Diffusion of Innovations , 2006, physics/0608295.

[27]  S. Fagerhaugh,et al.  Participant Observation , 1979 .

[28]  S. Laursen,et al.  From innovation to implementation : Multi-institution pedagogical reform in undergraduate mathematics , 2013 .

[29]  S. Brownell,et al.  Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity? , 2012, CBE life sciences education.

[30]  Sandra L. Laursen,et al.  Transformative Learning , 2015 .

[31]  Laura M. Desimone,et al.  What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers , 2001 .

[32]  Matthew Pilarz,et al.  Short and Long-Term Impacts of the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop. , 2015 .

[33]  Marina Kogan,et al.  Benefits for Women and Men of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics: A Multi-Institution Study. , 2014 .

[34]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  Student perceptions of pedagogy and associated persistence in calculus , 2014 .

[35]  Larry R. Johannessen,et al.  Reflective Teaching, Reflective Learning: How to Develop Critically Engaged Readers, Writers, and Speakers , 2005 .

[36]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty , 2010 .

[37]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[38]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations , 2011 .

[39]  David B. Knight,et al.  Professional Development, Departmental Contexts, and Use of Instructional Strategies , 2014 .

[40]  Jennifer L. Momsen,et al.  What We Say is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs , 2011 .

[41]  Carol L. O'Donnell.  Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring Fidelity of Implementation and Its Relationship to Outcomes in K–12 Curriculum Intervention Research , 2008 .

[42]  Louise Yarnall,et al.  Applying the Brakes: How Practical Classroom Decisions Affect the Adoption of Inquiry Instruction , 2014 .

[43]  Melissa H. Dancy,et al.  Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics , 2007 .

[44]  Clayton F. Callis,et al.  Council of Scientific Society Presidents , 1990 .

[45]  Matthew T. Hora,et al.  Instructional Systems of Practice: A Multidimensional Analysis of Math and Science Undergraduate Course Planning and Classroom Teaching , 2013 .

[46]  Joseph J. Gonzalez.  My Journey With Inquiry-Based Learning , 2013 .

[47]  Barry Fishman,et al.  THE EMPIRICAL BASE FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN SCIENCE EDUCATION: MOVING BEYOND VOLUNTEERS , 2001 .

[48]  Matthew Jones,et al.  An Overview of Inquiry‐Based Learning in Mathematics , 2013 .

[49]  James W. Stigler,et al.  What Community College Developmental Mathematics Students Understand about Mathematics. , 2010 .