Need–Supply Fit in an Activity-Based Flexible Office: A Longitudinal Study During Relocation

Combinations of concentrated work and interactions are facilitated by office environments such as activity-based flexible offices (A-FOs). A-FOs are characterized by activity-based workspaces, an open-plan layout, and desk sharing. Although there is a growing enthusiasm for replacing cellular offices with A-FOs, the effects of such changes on office workers are still unclear. Within this three-wave longitudinal study, we investigated the changes (time lag of 1 and 8 months after the redesign) in perceived need–supply fit, distraction, interaction across teams, and workspace satisfaction during relocation from a cellular office to an A-FO. Moreover, as previous case studies indicated individual differences in the use of A-FOs, we considered participants’ perceived need–supply fit as a moderator indicating an appropriate use of A-FO supplies. We found a linear increase of perceived need–supply fit, a decrease in distraction, and a significant interaction effect where workspace satisfaction and interaction across teams increased more strongly for participants reporting a better perceived need–supply fit.

[1]  A. Maher,et al.  Individual differences in employee reactions to open-plan offices , 2005 .

[2]  Roman Boutellier,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Workspace Design for Knowledge Exploration and Exploitation in the Research and Development Process , 2015 .

[3]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  4 The Physical Environment in Organizations , 2007 .

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[6]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures? , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Choosing where to work at work – towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices , 2017, Ergonomics.

[8]  Lisa Schurer Lambert,et al.  The phenomenology of fit: linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  Anne-Laure Fayard,et al.  Photocopiers and Water-coolers: The Affordances of Informal Interaction , 2007 .

[10]  Judith K Sluiter,et al.  Effects of office innovation on office workers' health and performance , 2009, Ergonomics.

[11]  D. Buchanan,et al.  No Going Back: A Review of the Literature on Sustaining Organizational Change , 2005 .

[12]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues , 2011 .

[13]  Christina Bodin Danielson,et al.  Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance , 2014 .

[14]  Antti Lönnqvist,et al.  ‘New Ways of Working’ as a tool for improving the performance of a knowledge-intensive company , 2015 .

[15]  Greg R. Oldham,et al.  Effects of changes in workspace partitions and spatial density on employee reactions: A quasi-experiment. , 1988 .

[16]  Kevin P. Scheibe,et al.  Influencing Organizational Commitment through Office Redesign. , 2012 .

[17]  Alison Hirst,et al.  Settlers, vagrants and mutual indifference: unintended consequences of hot‐desking , 2011 .

[18]  Amy Canevello,et al.  The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: a self-determination theory perspective. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data , 2001 .

[20]  D. S. Derue,et al.  The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  Scott L. Thomas,et al.  Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling with IBM SPSS , 2010 .

[22]  H.A.J.A. Appel Meulenbroek,et al.  An end user’s perspective on activity-based office concepts , 2011 .

[23]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Putting Employees in Their Place: The Impact of Hot Desking on Organizational and Team Identification , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[24]  S. Brunia,et al.  Personalization in non?territorial offices: A study of a human need , 2009 .

[25]  Casper J. Albers,et al.  Flexibility in use: Switching behaviour and satisfaction in activity-based work environments , 2016 .

[26]  J. Brand,et al.  Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes , 2005 .

[27]  H. Kraemer,et al.  Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[28]  Hui Cai,et al.  The Common First Year Studio in a Hot-desking Age: An Explorative Study on the Studio Environment and Learning , 2010 .

[29]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects , 2010 .

[30]  Christina Bodin Danielsson,et al.  Office Type in Relation to Health, Well-Being, and Job Satisfaction Among Employees , 2008 .

[31]  Theo van der Voordt,et al.  Productivity and employee satisfaction in flexible workplaces , 2004 .

[32]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing team leaders’ well-being states and challenge experiences during organizational change: A randomized, controlled study , 2012 .

[33]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  Relationship Between Workplace Spatial Settings and Occupant-Perceived Support for Collaboration , 2011 .

[34]  G. Picasso,et al.  Privacy and communication in an open-plan office: A case study , 1980 .

[35]  Juriaan van Meel,et al.  The origins of new ways of working: Office concepts in the 1970s , 2011 .

[36]  K. Nielsen,et al.  Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects , 2013 .

[37]  R. Caplan.  Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms , 1987 .

[38]  Theresa J. B. Kline,et al.  Traditional versus Open Office Design , 2002 .

[39]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[40]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[41]  I. D. Been,et al.  The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support , 2014 .

[42]  P Paul F M Kuijer,et al.  The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: a systematic review of the literature , 2005, Ergonomics.

[43]  Cornelia Wulff,et al.  Office design's impact on sick leave rates , 2014, Ergonomics.

[44]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  Daantje Derks,et al.  New Ways of Working: Impact on Working Conditions, Work–Family Balance, and Well-Being , 2014 .

[46]  Sandra Ohly,et al.  Diary Studies in Organizational Research: An Introduction and Some Practical Recommendations , 2010 .

[47]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices - eScholarship , 2013 .

[48]  V Hongisto,et al.  Effects of acoustic environment on work in private office rooms and open-plan offices – longitudinal study during relocation , 2009, Ergonomics.

[49]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Employee reactions to office redesign: A naturally occurring quasi-field experiment in a multi-generational setting , 2010 .

[50]  Rianne Appel-Meulenbroek,et al.  Knowledge sharing through co‐presence: added value of facilities , 2010 .

[51]  So Young Lee,et al.  Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces? , 2010, Ergonomics.

[52]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[53]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Understanding the physical environment of work and employee behavior: An affective events perspective , 2014 .