Tibial cartilage hypertrophy due to matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the medial femoral condyle. A case report.

Osteochondral graft hypertrophy is commonly seen after autologous chondrocyte transplantation with use of a periosteal flap1,2. Reoperation may be performed because of a high grade of hypertrophy causing persistent clinical symptoms. The use of a collagen membrane to cover the chondrocyte suspension can reduce the risk of graft hypertrophy3,4. Further technological advances have led to a third generation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation with use of biomaterials seeded with chondrocytes as so-called all-in-one scaffolds that generate new articular cartilage5. Nevertheless, graft hypertrophy continues to occur, although the prevalence has been reduced with matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation6,7. We present the case of a patient who complained of a reduced range of motion after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the medial femoral condyle. The patient was found to have tibial cartilage hypertrophy opposite the site of the matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation. The patient was informed that data concerning the case would be submitted for publication, and he consented. A forty-nine-year-old man was treated with matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation for a single full-thickness cartilage defect of the medial femoral condyle. The nature of the cartilage defect was traumatic, and the time interval between the initial symptoms and diagnosis was approximately six months. Surgical treatment followed after another six months, as nonsurgical therapy did not provide substantial clinical improvement. During the two-step surgical procedure, in a first arthroscopic step (Fig. 1), the isolated nature of the cartilage defect was documented, the borders of the defect were debrided, approximately 200 mg of normal cartilage tissue was harvested for culture, and the chondrocytes were cultured for three weeks. In the second step, with use of a mini-arthrotomy, a hyaluronan-based scaffold (Hyalograft C; Fidia Advanced Biopolymers, Abano Terme, Italy), seeded with the cultured chondrocytes, …

[1]  Siegfried Trattnig,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment at 3-T MR imaging: in vivo differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage from reparative tissue after two cartilage repair procedures--initial experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  N. Ghanem,et al.  Classification of graft hypertrophy after autologous chondrocyte implantation of full-thickness chondral defects in the knee. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  B. Morrey,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Chondral Defects of the Knee With a Type I/III Collagen Membrane: A Prospective Study With a 3-Year Follow-up , 2008 .

[4]  Jiake Xu,et al.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): biological and histological assessment. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[5]  Michael Deimling,et al.  Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) for in vivo evaluation of reparative cartilage after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation at 3.0T: Preliminary results. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  P. Lavigne,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation: natural history of postimplantation periosteal hypertrophy and effects of repair-site debridement on outcome. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. , 2006, Radiology.

[8]  S. Marlovits,et al.  MR imaging of osteochondral grafts and autologous chondrocyte implantation , 2006, European Radiology.

[9]  Peter Behrens,et al.  Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)--5-year follow-up. , 2006, The Knee.

[10]  Takayuki Obata,et al.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR to determine glycosaminoglycan concentration in reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation: preliminary results. , 2006, Radiology.

[11]  Vilmos Vécsei,et al.  Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[12]  J A Skinner,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a prospective, randomised study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  G. Guillot,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage repair tissue after biomaterial implantation in rat patella by using T2 mapping , 2004, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[14]  T. Mosher,et al.  Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. , 2004, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology.

[15]  S. Cannon,et al.  The use of chondrogide membrane in autologous chondrocyte implantation. , 2004, The Knee.

[16]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Evaluation of Cartilage Injuries and Repair , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  V J Schmithorst,et al.  Spatial variation in cartilage T2 of the knee , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  K. T. Scott,et al.  Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)2–‐enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  I. Reimann,et al.  DIFFERENTIAL HISTOCHEMICAL STAINING OF GLYCOSAMINOGLYCANS IN THE MATRIX OF OSTEOARTHRITIC CARTILAGE , 1980, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section A, Pathology.

[20]  N. Mitchell,et al.  The localization of proteoglycan by light and electron microscopy using safranin O. A study of epiphyseal cartilage. , 1976, Journal of ultrastructure research.