Robustness of MEK-ERK Dynamics and Origins of Cell-to-Cell Variability in MAPK Signaling

Summary Cellular signaling processes can exhibit pronounced cell-to-cell variability in genetically identical cells. This affects how individual cells respond differentially to the same environmental stimulus. However, the origins of cell-to-cell variability in cellular signaling systems remain poorly understood. Here, we measure the dynamics of phosphorylated MEK and ERK across cell populations and quantify the levels of population heterogeneity over time using high-throughput image cytometry. We use a statistical modeling framework to show that extrinsic noise, particularly that from upstream MEK, is the dominant factor causing cell-to-cell variability in ERK phosphorylation, rather than stochasticity in the phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of ERK. We furthermore show that without extrinsic noise in the core module, variable (including noisy) signals would be faithfully reproduced downstream, but the within-module extrinsic variability distorts these signals and leads to a drastic reduction in the mutual information between incoming signal and ERK activity.

[1]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Identifying sources of variation and the flow of information in biochemical networks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Hiroyuki Kubota,et al.  A Quantitative Image Cytometry Technique for Time Series or Population Analyses of Signaling Networks , 2010, PloS one.

[3]  C. Pesce,et al.  Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system , 2005, Nature.

[4]  Tina Toni,et al.  Designing attractive models via automated identification of chaotic and oscillatory dynamical regimes , 2011, Nature communications.

[5]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Robustness and Compensation of Information Transmission of Signaling Pathways , 2013, Science.

[6]  Eric D. Kolaczyk,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Network Data: Methods and Models , 2009 .

[7]  Heather A. Harrington,et al.  Cellular compartments cause multistability and allow cells to process more information. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Bärbel Finkenstädt,et al.  Using a single fluorescent reporter gene to infer half-life of extrinsic noise and other parameters of gene expression. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Katsuyuki Kunida,et al.  Processive phosphorylation of ERK MAP kinase in mammalian cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[11]  P. Sorger,et al.  Non-genetic origins of cell-to-cell variability in TRAIL-induced apoptosis , 2009, Nature.

[12]  David A. Rand,et al.  Bayesian inference of biochemical kinetic parameters using the linear noise approximation , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[13]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling , 2009, Science Signaling.

[14]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Decomposing noise in biochemical signaling systems highlights the role of protein degradation. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[15]  P. Moral,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo samplers , 2002, cond-mat/0212648.

[16]  K. Strimmer,et al.  Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology A Shrinkage Approach to Large-Scale Covariance Matrix Estimation and Implications for Functional Genomics , 2011 .

[17]  Shinya Kuroda,et al.  Prediction and validation of the distinct dynamics of transient and sustained ERK activation , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  Galit Lahav,et al.  Stimulus-dependent dynamics of p53 in single cells , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[19]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Combined Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variability for Computational Network Design with Application to Synthetic Biology , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  MAP kinase modules: the excursion model and the steps that count. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Michael P. H. Stumpf,et al.  GPU accelerated biochemical network simulation , 2011, Bioinform..

[22]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations can drastically change the response of a MAPK pathway , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Darren J Wilkinson,et al.  Bayesian inference for Markov jump processes with informative observations , 2014, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[24]  Holger Schwender,et al.  Bibliography Reverse Engineering Genetic Networks Using the Genenet Package , 2006 .

[25]  C. Schröter,et al.  FGF/MAPK signaling sets the switching threshold of a bistable circuit controlling cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells , 2015, Development.

[26]  M. Torres-Padilla,et al.  Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog , 2012, Nature.

[27]  Michael P. H. Stumpf,et al.  StochSens - matlab package for sensitivity analysis of stochastic chemical systems , 2012, Bioinform..

[28]  Tina Toni,et al.  Elucidating the in vivo phosphorylation dynamics of the ERK MAP kinase using quantitative proteomics data and Bayesian model selection. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[29]  Muffy Calder,et al.  The Mammalian MAPK/ERK Pathway Exhibits Properties of a Negative Feedback Amplifier , 2010, Science Signaling.

[30]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[31]  Marta Cascante,et al.  Bistability from double phosphorylation in signal transduction , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[32]  Anne E Carpenter,et al.  Improved structure, function and compatibility for CellProfiler: modular high-throughput image analysis software , 2011, Bioinform..

[33]  Tobias Meyer,et al.  Spatial Positive Feedback at the Onset of Mitosis , 2012, Cell.

[34]  P. Swain,et al.  The role of proofreading in signal transduction specificity. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Andreas Hellander,et al.  A Hierarchy of Approximations of the Master Equation Scaled by a Size Parameter , 2008, J. Sci. Comput..

[36]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Information Processing by Simple Molecular Motifs and Susceptibility to Noise , 2015, bioRxiv.

[37]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Distributivity and processivity in multisite phosphorylation can be distinguished through steady-state invariants. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[38]  Daniel Silk Unscented approaches to inference and design for systems and synthetic biology , 2013 .

[39]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[40]  Claire V. Harper,et al.  Population robustness arising from cellular heterogeneity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Herpes viruses hedge their bets , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  C. Der,et al.  Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[43]  L. Greene,et al.  Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Heather A. Harrington,et al.  Mathematical modeling reveals the functional implications of the different nuclear shuttling rates of Erk1 and Erk2 , 2012, Physical biology.

[45]  Clive G. Bowsher,et al.  Information transfer by leaky, heterogeneous, protein kinase signaling systems , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  R. Milo,et al.  Oscillations and variability in the p53 system , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[47]  J. Skotheim,et al.  Commitment to a cellular transition precedes genome-wide transcriptional change. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[48]  Sarah J. Plowman,et al.  Activation of the MAPK module from different spatial locations generates distinct system outputs. , 2008, Molecular biology of the cell.

[49]  Shinsuke Uda,et al.  Temporal Decoding of MAP Kinase and CREB Phosphorylation by Selective Immediate Early Gene Expression , 2013, PloS one.

[50]  Simon J. Julier,et al.  The scaled unscented transformation , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[51]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[52]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[54]  Matthias Jeschke,et al.  Determinants of Cell-to-Cell Variability in Protein Kinase Signaling , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  Vito Quaranta,et al.  Not all noise is waste , 2010, Nature Methods.

[56]  Shinsuke Uda,et al.  Sensitivity control through attenuation of signal transfer efficiency by negative regulation of cellular signalling , 2012, Nature Communications.

[57]  Thomas Thorne,et al.  Model selection in systems and synthetic biology. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[58]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Ultrasensitivity part II: multisite phosphorylation, stoichiometric inhibitors, and positive feedback. , 2014, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[59]  Joan Weiner,et al.  Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[60]  Iain G Johnston,et al.  Efficient parametric inference for stochastic biological systems with measured variability , 2014, Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology.

[61]  J. Elf,et al.  Fast evaluation of fluctuations in biochemical networks with the linear noise approximation. , 2003, Genome research.

[62]  James R. Johnson,et al.  Oscillations in NF-κB Signaling Control the Dynamics of Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[63]  A. Feinberg,et al.  Regulated Noise in the Epigenetic Landscape of Development and Disease , 2012, Cell.

[64]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Separating intrinsic from extrinsic fluctuations in dynamic biological systems , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[65]  D. S. Broomhead,et al.  Pulsatile Stimulation Determines Timing and Specificity of NF-κB-Dependent Transcription , 2009, Science.

[66]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[67]  Julien F. Ollivier,et al.  Colored extrinsic fluctuations and stochastic gene expression , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[68]  Heather A. Harrington,et al.  Nuclear to cytoplasmic shuttling of ERK promotes differentiation of muscle stem/progenitor cells , 2014, Development.

[69]  Hiroyuki Kubota,et al.  Decoupling of Receptor and Downstream Signals in the Akt Pathway by Its Low-Pass Filter Characteristics , 2010, Science Signaling.

[70]  A. Martinez Arias,et al.  Cell dynamics and gene expression control in tissue homeostasis and development , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[71]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[72]  Thomas Thorne,et al.  Graphical modelling of molecular networks underlying sporadic inclusion body myositis. , 2013, Molecular bioSystems.

[73]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Mechanistic Studies of the Dual Phosphorylation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[74]  L. Tsimring,et al.  Accurate information transmission through dynamic biochemical signaling networks , 2014, Science.

[75]  David A. Rand,et al.  Measurement of single-cell dynamics , 2010, Nature.

[76]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.