Assessment of concentrated flow through riparian buffers

ABSTRACT: Concentrated flow of surface runoff from agricultural fields may limit the capability of riparian buffers to remove pollutants. This study was conducted on four farms in southeastern Nebraska to develop a method for assessing the extent of concentrated flow in riparian buffers and for evaluating the impact that it has on sediment-trapping efficiency. Field methods consisted of mapping field runoff areas and their pathways to and through riparian buffers to streams. Mathematical relationships were developed from a model (VFSMOD) that estimates sediment-trapping efficiency from the ratio of buffer area to field runoff area. Among the farms surveyed, riparian buffers averaged 9 to 35 m wide, and gross buffer area ranged from 1.5 to 7.2 ha, but the effective buffer area that actually contacts runoff water was only 0.2 to 1.3 ha. Patterns of topography and microrelief in fields and riparian zones prevented uniform distribution of field runoff across entire buffer areas. Using the mathematical relationships, it is estimated that riparian buffers at each of the four farms could potentially remove 99%, 67%, 59%, and 41% of sediment from field runoff if the runoff is uniformly distributed over the entire gross buffer area. However, because of non-uniform distribution, it is estimated that only 43%, 15%, 23%, and 34%, respectively, would actually be removed. The results indicate that concentrated flow through riparian buffers can be substantial and may greatly limit filtering effectiveness in this region.

[1]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. , 2000 .

[2]  M. R. Overcash,et al.  Predicting Runoff Pollutant Reduction in Buffer Zones Adjacent to Land Treatment Sites , 1981 .

[3]  R. I. Barnhisel,et al.  Performance of Grass Filters Under Laboratory and Field Conditions , 1984 .

[4]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots , 1988 .

[5]  L. G. Wilson,et al.  Sediment Removal from Flood Water by Grass Filtration , 1967 .

[6]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian Filters , 1996 .

[7]  V. Souchère,et al.  Effects of tillage on runoff directions: consequences on runoff contributing area within agricultural catchments , 1998 .

[8]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control , 1989 .

[9]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Sediment deposition patterns in simulated grass filters , 1977 .

[10]  W. E. Larson,et al.  The role of severe storms in soil erosion : A problem needing consideration , 1997 .

[11]  R. Rudra,et al.  Validation of a vegetated filter strip model (VFSMOD) , 2001 .

[12]  Billy J. Barfield,et al.  WATER QUALITY IMPACTS OF NATURAL FILTER STRIPS IN KARST AREAS , 1998 .

[13]  Benoit Real,et al.  The Use of Grassed Buffer Strips to Remove Pesticides, Nitrate and Soluble Phosphorus Compounds from Runoff Water , 1997 .

[14]  C. T. Haan,et al.  Suspended Sediment Filtration Capacity of Simulated Vegetation , 1976 .

[15]  V. Hansen INFILTRATION AND SOIL WATER MOVEMENT DURING IRRIGATION , 1955 .

[16]  L. Bren A case study in the use of threshold measures of hydrologic loading in the design of stream buffer strips. , 2000 .

[17]  L. Verchot,et al.  Nitrogen cycling in Piedmont vegetated filter zones : I. Surface soil processes , 1997 .

[18]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Management effects on runoff and sediment transport in riparian forest buffers , 1999 .

[19]  J. E. Parsons,et al.  Numerical Approach to the Overland Flow Process in Vegetative Filter Strips , 1993 .

[20]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Efficiency and dimensioning of riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments , 1997 .

[21]  Dale H. Vanderholm,et al.  Vegetative Filter Treatment of Livestock Feedlot Runoff , 1981 .

[22]  Russell B. Brinsfield,et al.  Nutrient and Sediment Removal by Vegetated Filter Stips , 1989 .

[23]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Herbicide Retention by Vegetative Buffer Strips from Runoff under Natural Rainfall , 1996 .

[24]  D. Shaw,et al.  Metolachlor and metribuzin losses in runoff as affected by width of vegetative filter strips , 1998, Weed Science.

[25]  Robert L. Blevins,et al.  Fecal bacteria trapping by grass filter strips during simulated rain , 1998 .

[26]  L. Bren The geometry of a constant buffer-loading design method for humid watersheds , 1998 .

[27]  Robert L. Blevins,et al.  Soil and fecal coliform trapping by grass filter strips during simulated rain , 1995 .

[28]  R. I. Barnhisel,et al.  Filtration of Sediment by Simulated Vegetation II. Unsteady Flow with Non-Homogeneous Sediment , 1979 .

[29]  John C. Hayes,et al.  Filtration of Sediment by Simulated Vegetation I. Steady-State Flow with Homogeneous Sediment , 1979 .

[30]  J. E. Parsons,et al.  Modeling hydrology and sediment transport in vegetative filter strips , 1999 .

[31]  M. Smolen,et al.  Enhancement of the effectiveness of forested filter zones by dispersion of agricultural runoff , 1992 .

[32]  N. L. Hartwig,et al.  Application Mode and Alternate Cropping Effects on Atrazine Losses From a Hillside 1 , 1983 .

[33]  Theo A. Dillaha,et al.  Long-Term Effectiveness and Maintenance of Vegetative Filter Strips , 1986 .