Evaluation of bone regeneration, angiogenesis, and hydroxyapatite conversion in critical-sized rat calvarial defects implanted with bioactive glass scaffolds.

Bioactive glasses are biocompatible materials that convert to hydroxyapatite in vivo, and potentially support bone formation, but have mainly been available in particulate and not scaffold form. In this study, borosilicate and borate bioactive glass scaffolds were evaluated in critical-sized rat calvarial defects. Twelve-week-old rats were implanted with 45S5 silicate glass particles and scaffolds of 1393 silicate, 1393B1 borosilicate, and 1393B3 borate glass. After 12 weeks, the defects were harvested, stained with hematoxylin and eosin to evaluate bone regeneration, Periodic Acid Schiff to quantitate blood vessel area, and von Kossa and backscatter SEM to estimate newly mineralized bone and hydroxyapatite conversion of bioactive glasses. The amount of new bone was 12.4% for 45S5, 8.5% for 1393, 9.7% for 1393B1, and 14.9% for 1393B3 (*p = 0.04; cf. 1393 and 1393B1). Blood vessel area was significantly higher (p = 0.009) with 45S5 (3.8%), with no differences among 1393 (2.0%), 1393B1 (2.4%), or 1393B3 (2.2%). Percent von Kossa-positive area was 18.7% for 45S5, 25.4% for 1393, 29.5% for 1393B1, and 30.1% for 1393B3, significantly higher (p = 0.014) in 1393B1 and 1393B3 glasses than in 45S5. 45S5 and 1393B3 converted completely to HA in vivo. The 1393B3 glass provided greater bone formation and may be more promising for bone defect repair due to its capacity to be molded into scaffolds. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 100A:3267-3275, 2012.

[1]  Keiichi Kuroki,et al.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. II. In vitro and in vivo biological evaluation. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[2]  Q. Fu,et al.  Silicate, borosilicate, and borate bioactive glass scaffolds with controllable degradation rate for bone tissue engineering applications. I. Preparation and in vitro degradation. , 2010, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[3]  Wenhai Huang,et al.  Conversion of borate-based glass scaffold to hydroxyapatite in a dilute phosphate solution , 2010, Biomedical materials.

[4]  D. Day,et al.  Accelerated Conversion of Silicate Bioactive Glass (13‐93) to Hydroxyapatite in Aqueous Phosphate Solution Containing Polyanions , 2009 .

[5]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Angiogenic response to bioactive glass promotes bone healing in an irradiated calvarial defect. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[6]  Delbert E Day,et al.  Mechanical and in vitro performance of 13-93 bioactive glass scaffolds prepared by a polymer foam replication technique. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  J. Kanczler,et al.  Osteogenesis and angiogenesis: the potential for engineering bone. , 2008, European cells & materials.

[8]  J. K. Leach,et al.  Proangiogenic Potential of a Collagen/Bioactive Glass Substrate , 2008, Pharmaceutical Research.

[9]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  The story of Bioglass® , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[10]  Wenhai Huang,et al.  Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate (45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[11]  R. Cabrini,et al.  Biological performance of boron-modified bioactive glass particles implanted in rat tibia bone marrow , 2006, Biomedical materials.

[12]  David J Mooney,et al.  Coating of VEGF-releasing scaffolds with bioactive glass for angiogenesis and bone regeneration. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[13]  David J Mooney,et al.  VEGF Scaffolds Enhance Angiogenesis and Bone Regeneration in Irradiated Osseous Defects , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Eleftherios Tsiridis,et al.  Bone substitutes: an update. , 2005, Injury.

[15]  Richard M Day,et al.  Bioactive glass stimulates the secretion of angiogenic growth factors and angiogenesis in vitro. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[16]  Michael T Longaker,et al.  Angiogenesis Is Required for Successful Bone Induction During Distraction Osteogenesis , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Assessment of polyglycolic acid mesh and bioactive glass for soft-tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[18]  L L Hench,et al.  Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of Bioglass 45S5 dissolution. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioglass ®45S5 Stimulates Osteoblast Turnover and Enhances Bone Formation In Vitro: Implications and Applications for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2000, Calcified Tissue International.

[20]  J. Polak,et al.  Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Quantitative comparison of bone growth behavior in granules of Bioglass, A-W glass-ceramic, and hydroxyapatite. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  H. Oonishi,et al.  Particulate Bioglass Compared With Hydroxyapatite as a Bone Graft Substitute , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  S. Wolfe Autogenous bone grafts versus alloplastic material in maxillofacial surgery. , 1982, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[24]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials , 1971 .

[25]  D. Day,et al.  In Vitro Bioactive Characteristics of Borate‐Based Glasses with Controllable Degradation Behavior , 2007 .

[26]  Delbert E. Day,et al.  Transformation of Borate Glasses into Biologically Useful Materials , 2003 .