t o say that the next generation of the Internet has changed things is to utter a severe understatement. While the Internet changed the nature of instant communication, it was constructed and utilized with a focus on a unidirectional distribution of content. Anyone who has ever worked collaboratively on a document is familiar with the headache of tracking changes, drafts, versions, and comments through endless e-mails, some of which were sent to everyone involved, and some of which were not. Web 2.0 and cloud computing have made collaborative efforts a Web-based social endeavor, one that can be customized and tailored to the individual or the institution’s needs without sacrificing efficiency or effectiveness. However, a system is only as good as its operator and design, and one that reinforces silos and barriers will, by its very nature, limit its own efficacy. To avoid silos and to make the most use of the social nature of cloud computing solutions for library workflow issues, library administrators and leaders must have an understanding of the building blocks of community. Using McMillan’s and Chavis’s model of community as a framework of analysis,2 this article examines how cloud computing and Web 2.0 technologies can be used by library administration and leadership to foster a sense of community and is guided by two questions: What are the core patterns of Web 2.0, and how can these technologies facilitate bidirectional influence to promote a sense of emotional attachment and fulfill the needs of the community members? This article does not examine the seemingly infinite possibilities for using Web 2.0 technologies for community-building outside of the library as a marketing vehicle with the community of library users. Instead, the author examines trends in the literature dealing with Web 2.0 and libraries, outlines a brief history and definition of Web 2.0, and applies the framework of McMillan and Chavis to cloud computing solutions in libraries. Readers should gain an understanding of how library leadership can foster a wholesome sense of community within their organizations using easy-to-use, and often free, Web-based computing solutions.
[1]
Samuel Kai Wah Chu.
Using Wikis in Academic Libraries.
,
2009
.
[2]
Marji Mcclure.
Web 2.0 Security : Getting Collaborative Peace of Mind
,
2008
.
[3]
Elizabeth Nelson.
Knowledge Management for Libraries
,
2008
.
[4]
David W. McMillan.
Sense of community
,
1996
.
[5]
Christine Greenhow.
Social Scholarship: Applying Social Networking Technologies to Research Practices.
,
2009
.
[6]
Pru Mitchell.
Learning architecture: issues in indexing Australian education in a Web 2.0 world
,
2008
.
[7]
John Bowman.
Communities of Practice: Web 2.0 Principles for Service in Art Libraries
,
2008,
Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America.
[8]
Megan Bresnahan,et al.
A case study: using social tagging to engage students in learning Medical Subject Headings.
,
2009,
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[9]
Jane Nichols.
Library à la Carte: Research and course guides made to order
,
2009
.
[10]
Norbert Pachler,et al.
Narrative and learning with Web 2.0 technologies: towards a research agenda
,
2009,
J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[11]
Robin Hastings.
Collaborating across Time Zones: How 2.0 Technology Can Bring Your Global Team Together.
,
2008
.
[12]
L. Hjorth.
Web U2: Emerging Online Communities and Gendered Intimacy in the Asia-Pacific region
,
2009
.
[13]
Andrew Ravenscroft,et al.
Social software, Web 2.0 and learning: status and implications of an evolving paradigm
,
2009,
J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[14]
D. Chavis,et al.
Sense of community: A definition and theory
,
1986
.
[15]
Erik Arnold.
Get Your Head Out of the Clouds : Thinking Clearly About the Next Big Thing
,
2008
.
[16]
Jonathan W. Musser,et al.
Web 2.0 : principles and best practices
,
2007
.