The role of actin protrusion dynamics in cell migration through a degradable viscoelastic extracellular matrix: Insights from a computational model

Actin protrusion dynamics plays an important role in the regulation of three-dimensional (3D) cell migration. Cells form protrusions that adhere to the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), mechanically probe the ECM and contract in order to displace the cell body. This results in cell migration that can be directed by the mechanical anisotropy of the ECM. However, the subcellular processes that regulate protrusion dynamics in 3D cell migration are difficult to investigate experimentally and therefore not well understood. Here, we present a computational model of cell migration through a degradable viscoelastic ECM. This model is a 2D representation of 3D cell migration. The cell is modeled as an active deformable object that captures the viscoelastic behavior of the actin cortex and the subcellular processes underlying 3D cell migration. The ECM is regarded as a viscoelastic material, with or without anisotropy due to fibrillar strain stiffening, and modeled by means of the meshless Lagrangian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method. ECM degradation is captured by local fluidization of the material and permits cell migration through the ECM. We demonstrate that changes in ECM stiffness and cell strength affect cell migration and are accompanied by changes in number, lifetime and length of protrusions. Interestingly, directly changing the total protrusion number or the average lifetime or length of protrusions does not affect cell migration. A stochastic variability in protrusion lifetime proves to be enough to explain differences in cell migration velocity. Force-dependent adhesion disassembly does not result in faster migration, but can make migration more efficient. We also demonstrate that when a number of simultaneous protrusions is enforced, the optimal number of simultaneous protrusions is one or two, depending on ECM anisotropy. Together, the model provides non-trivial new insights in the role of protrusions in 3D cell migration and can be a valuable contribution to increase the understanding of 3D cell migration mechanics.

[1]  Ruben Martinez-Cantin,et al.  Integration of in vitro and in silico Models Using Bayesian Optimization With an Application to Stochastic Modeling of Mesenchymal 3D Cell Migration , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[2]  J. Folgado,et al.  Computational model of mesenchymal migration in 3D under chemotaxis , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[3]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  Three-dimensional matrix fiber alignment modulates cell migration and MT1-MMP utility by spatially and temporally directing protrusions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Benoit Ladoux,et al.  Front-Rear Polarization by Mechanical Cues: From Single Cells to Tissues. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[6]  Claudia Tanja Mierke,et al.  Physical view on migration modes , 2015, Cell adhesion & migration.

[7]  B. R. Bass,et al.  3D collagen alignment limits protrusions to enhance breast cancer cell persistence. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Stretchy proteins on stretchy substrates: the important elements of integrin-mediated rigidity sensing. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[9]  Albert Jin,et al.  Local 3D matrix microenvironment regulates cell migration through spatiotemporal dynamics of contractility-dependent adhesions , 2015, Nature Communications.

[10]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree , 1995, Adv. Comput. Math..

[11]  Clare M Waterman,et al.  Actomyosin Cortical Mechanical Properties in Nonadherent Cells Determined by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2016, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Modeling extracellular matrix viscoelasticity using smoothed particle hydrodynamics with improved boundary treatment , 2017 .

[13]  Robert M. Hoffman,et al.  Physical limits of cell migration: Control by ECM space and nuclear deformation and tuning by proteolysis and traction force , 2013, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Myosin II-Mediated Focal Adhesion Maturation Is Tension Insensitive , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Solving microscopic flow problems using Stokes equations in SPH , 2013, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[16]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[17]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Cynthia A Reinhart-King,et al.  Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[20]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[21]  James Hone,et al.  Tropomyosin Controls Sarcomere-like Contractions for Rigidity Sensing and Suppressing Growth on Soft Matrices , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Dirk Drasdo,et al.  Quantifying the mechanics and growth of cells and tissues in 3D using high resolution computational models , 2018, bioRxiv.

[23]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Phase-field model of cellular migration: Three-dimensional simulations in fibrous networks , 2017 .

[24]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[25]  M. Stack,et al.  Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  B. Fabry,et al.  Biphasic response of cell invasion to matrix stiffness in three-dimensional biopolymer networks. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[27]  S. Rizzi,et al.  Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Computational model for amoeboid motion: Coupling membrane and cytosol dynamics. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[29]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Three-dimensional force microscopy of cells in biopolymer networks , 2015, Nature Methods.

[30]  Patrick T. Caswell,et al.  Actin-Based Cell Protrusion in a 3D Matrix , 2018, Trends in cell biology.

[31]  Adrian Moure,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of obstacle-mediated chemotaxis , 2018, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[32]  P. Mattila,et al.  Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[33]  Ed Munro,et al.  Determinants of fluidlike behavior and effective viscosity in cross-linked actin networks. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Quan Quan,et al.  Novel anti-thrombotic agent for modulation of protein disulfide isomerase family member ERp57 for prophylactic therapy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[35]  Enrico Giampieri,et al.  A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Body Composition Among Healthy Elderly From the European NU-AGE Study: Sex and Country Specific Features , 2018, Front. Physiol..

[36]  Alex Mogilner,et al.  Comparison of cell migration mechanical strategies in three-dimensional matrices: a computational study , 2016, Interface Focus.

[37]  Bart Smeets,et al.  Analysis of Initial Cell Spreading Using Mechanistic Contact Formulations for a Deformable Cell Model , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Robert S. Adelstein,et al.  Local Cortical Tension by Myosin II Guides 3D Endothelial Cell Branching , 2009, Current Biology.

[39]  Shawn P. Carey,et al.  Local extracellular matrix alignment directs cellular protrusion dynamics and migration through Rac1 and FAK. , 2016, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[40]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Stretching Single Talin Rod Molecules Activates Vinculin Binding , 2009, Science.

[41]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  A Lagrangian particle method for the simulation of linear and nonlinear elastic models of soft tissue , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[42]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  At the leading edge of three-dimensional cell migration , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[43]  C. Storm,et al.  Normal stresses in elastic networks. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Roger D Kamm,et al.  Computational modeling of three-dimensional ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Nonpolarized signaling reveals two distinct modes of 3D cell migration , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  John Kolega,et al.  Endothelial cell protrusion and migration in three-dimensional collagen matrices. , 2006, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[47]  R D Kamm,et al.  Mechano-sensing and cell migration: a 3D model approach , 2011, Physical biology.

[48]  Erez Raz,et al.  The role and regulation of blebs in cell migration , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[49]  Andrew V. Martin,et al.  Optimal mapping of x-ray laser diffraction patterns into three dimensions using routing algorithms. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[50]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Myosin-II controls cellular branching morphogenesis and migration in 3D by minimizing cell surface curvature , 2014, Nature Cell Biology.