Interstate Professional Associations and the Diffusion of Policy Innovations

Although scholars have found that policy innovations diffuse across states in a systematic manner, they generally have not examined the role that individuals and institutions play in promoting diffusion. I posit that interstate professional associations provide institutional foundations for the development and dissemination of innovations by state officials with jurisdiction over particular policy areas. I test this hypothesis by examining the determinants of state adoption of the Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Model Act, a comprehensive set of regulations developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). My central finding is that states whose insurance commissioner participated in the NAIC’s Accident and Health Insurance Committee, which has jurisdiction over HMO regulation, were more likely than other states to adopt the Model Act. This result provides evidence that associations can affect policy diffusion. It also sharpens the conventional wisdom by highlighting a specific institutional arrangement—a committee system—through which participation in associations can facilitate the adoption of innovations.

[1]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[2]  William D. Berry,et al.  Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States , 1998 .

[3]  John B. Willett,et al.  It’s About Time: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Study Duration and the Timing of Events , 1993 .

[4]  William D. Berry,et al.  The Politics of Tax Increases in the States , 1994 .

[5]  Russell L. Hanson,et al.  Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis , 1990 .

[6]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[7]  For our patients, not for profits: a call to action. , 1997, JAMA.

[8]  Alan Richards,et al.  Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[9]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[10]  Michael Mintrom,et al.  Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms , 1998, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Melissa Marschall,et al.  Institutional Arrangements and the Creation of Social Capital: The Effects of Public School Choice , 1997, American Political Science Review.

[13]  Thomas Pasko,et al.  Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the Us: 1999 , 1998 .

[14]  Deborah M. Burek.  Encyclopedia of associations , 1990 .

[15]  Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier,et al.  Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science , 1997 .

[16]  D. Wholey,et al.  State responses to HMO failures. , 1991, Health affairs.

[17]  Christopher H. Achen.  The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments , 2023 .

[18]  William D. Berry,et al.  Tax Innovation in the States: Capitalizing on Political Opportunity , 1992 .

[19]  C. Mooney,et al.  Legislative Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform , 1995 .

[20]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  The Role of Agenda Setting in Policy Innovation , 1997 .

[21]  Margaret K. Schafer.  Encyclopedia of Associations , 1981 .

[22]  Frances S. Berry.  Sizing Up State Policy Innovation Research , 1994 .

[23]  S. Welch,et al.  The Impact of Federal Incentives on State Policy Innovation , 1980 .

[24]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable , 1998 .

[25]  K Close,et al.  AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS COMPUTER SYSTEMS INDEX , 1976 .

[26]  David S. Broder,et al.  The System: The American Way of Politics at the Breaking Point , 1996 .

[27]  Cal Jillson,et al.  New Perspectives on American Politics , 1993 .

[28]  Virginia Gray,et al.  Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study , 1973, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Lawrence B. Mohr,et al.  Determinants of Innovation in Organizations , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[30]  R. L. Savage.  When a Policy's Time Has Come: Cases of Rapid Policy Diffusion 1983–1984 , 1985 .

[31]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Linear probability, logit and probit models , 1984 .