Practical implementation of auditory time and frequency weighting in marine bioacoustics

Abstract Much effort is currently directed at describing the behavioral reactions of marine mammals following exposure to sound with the aim of deriving generalized thresholds and dose-response functions. The perceived loudness of a given sound is a candidate for a common metric for sound exposure. The loudness of a signal relates to various factors, including the stimulus duration and frequency content, and it can be approximated by an appropriate time and frequency weighting of the signal. Auditory frequency weighting is achieved by applying a frequency weighting function (band-pass filter), with a frequency response resembling the shape of an inverted audiogram. Temporal weighting may be achieved by computing the running rms-average (Leq) with a time constant that is comparable to that of the mammalian auditory system. The practical implementation of such weighting functions are presented in the form of Matlab functions. These functions generate output signals that are weighted according to current recommendations for different groups of marine mammals. With these functions, it is possible to derive the weighted peak Leq of a signal, which is likely to be a good proxy for the loudness of the signal. Ultimately, this weighted level is conjectured to be a predictor of behavioral response of marine mammals to the sound.

[1]  R. Kastelein,et al.  The effect of signal duration on the underwater detection thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for single frequency-modulated tonal signals between 0.25 and 160 kHz. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  A. Frankel,et al.  A New Context‐Based Approach to Assess Marine Mammal Behavioral Responses to Anthropogenic Sounds , 2012, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Colleen Reichmuth,et al.  A review of the history, development and application of auditory weighting functions in humans and marine mammals. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Jakob Tougaard,et al.  Why is auditory frequency weighting so important in regulation of underwater noise? , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Russel D. Andrews,et al.  Diving behaviour of Cuvier's beaked whales exposed to two types of military sonar , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[6]  R. Fay,et al.  Hearing in Vertebrates: A Psychophysics Databook , 1988 .

[7]  The effect of signal duration on the underwater hearing thresholds of two harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) for single tonal signals between 0.2 and 40 kHz. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Jakob Tougaard,et al.  Cetacean noise criteria revisited in the light of proposed exposure limits for harbour porpoises. , 2015, Marine pollution bulletin.

[9]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Relation between Hearing Threshold and Duration for Tone Pulses , 1959 .

[10]  C. S. Johnson,et al.  Relation between absolute thresholdand duration-of-tone pulses in the bottlenosed porpoise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Peter L. Tyack,et al.  Experimental field studies to measure behavioral responses of cetaceans to sonar , 2016 .

[12]  James J Finneran,et al.  Noise-induced hearing loss in marine mammals: A review of temporary threshold shift studies from 1996 to 2015. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal integration of loudness, loudness discrimination, and the form of the loudness function. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J J Finneran,et al.  Criteria and Thresholds for U.S. Navy Acoustic and Explosive Effects Analysis , 2012 .

[15]  E. de Boer,et al.  Auditory Time Constants: A Paradox? , 1985 .

[16]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal Detection as a Function of Signal Intensity and Duration , 1957 .