Hemispheric asymmetries for global and local visual perception: effects of stimulus and task factors.

Although neurotogical and physiological studies indicate a right hemisphere superiority in global processing and a left hemisphere superiority in local processing of Navon-type hierarchical letters (D. Navon, 1977), most investigations of lateralized perception in healthy participants report neither asymmetry. In 6 experiments the authors examined the influence of attentional demands, stimulus properties, and mode of response on perceptual asymmetries for global and local perception. Consistent with their theoretical predictions, asymmetries were more robust on divided- than focused-attention tasks and in response to stimuli in which local and global levels were equally salient compared with those with greater global than local saliency. Contrary to their prediction, perceptual asymmetries were not influenced by the complexity of the motor response.

[1]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  G. Mangun,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  J. R. Simon The Effects of an Irrelevant Directional CUE on Human Information Processing , 1990 .

[4]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[5]  D. Delis,et al.  Visuospatial functioning before and after commissurotomy. Disconnection in hierarchical processing. , 1988, Archives of neurology.

[6]  B. Hommel Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity , 1994, Psychological research.

[7]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  ‘Part-whole’ processing in unilateral brain- damaged patients: Dysfunction of hierarchical organization , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  R T Knight,et al.  Cognitive neuropsychology is more than single-case studies. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency on global precedence and hemispheric differences , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Jonides Left and Right Visual Field Superiority for Letter Classification , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  M. J. Blanca,et al.  Hemispheric differences in global and local processing dependent on exposure duration , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M. V. Kleeck Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  M. Mena Can certain stimulus characteristics influence the hemispheric differences in global and local processing , 1992 .

[19]  R W Sperry,et al.  Reception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. , 1972, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  J. Sergent,et al.  Role of task factors in visual field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Further analyses of masking functions in laterality studies of face-recognition , 1988, Brain and Cognition.

[22]  D. Kimura,et al.  Motor functions of the left hemisphere. , 1974, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Early versus late stages of processing and their relation to functional hemispheric asymmetries in face recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Influence of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on reaction time of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized light stimuli. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  C. R. Lines Nasotemporal overlap investigated in a case of agenesis of the corpus callosum , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  J. Hellige Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. , 1995 .

[29]  L C Robertson,et al.  The processing of hierarchical stimuli: Effects of retinal locus, locational uncertainty, and stimulus identity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  David B. Boles,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Global versus Local Processing: Still Unclear , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Interhemispheric relations in processing hierarchical patterns: Evidence from normal and commissurotomized subjects. , 1993 .

[32]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. Moscovitch Laterality and visual masking: interhemispheric communication and the locus of perceptual asymmetries for words. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[34]  Stephen Christman,et al.  Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[36]  NeuroscL Abstr,et al.  Brain-imaging studies of cognitive functions , 1994 .

[37]  A. Milner,et al.  Nasotemporal overlap in the human retina investigated by means of simple reaction time to lateralized light flash , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  S. Sherman,et al.  Nasotemporal overlap in visual field projected to lateral geniculate nucleus in the cat. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  D. Boles Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  J. Wilding,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Matching Stroop-Type Letter Stimuli , 1982, Cortex.

[42]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[43]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.