Modularity and Dynamics of Cellular Networks

Understanding how the phenotypes and behaviors of cells are controlled is one of the major challenges in biological research. Traditionally, focus has been given to the characterization of individual genes/proteins or individual interactions during cellular events. However, many phenotypes and behaviors cannot be attributed to isolated components. Rather, they arise from characteristics of cellular networks, which represent connections between molecules in cells. We review the recent progress on analyzing the architecture and dynamics of cellular networks. We also summarize how computational modeling yields insight about cell signaling pathways. The responses of cells to genetic perturbations or environmental cues are controlled by complex networks, including interconnected signaling pathways and cascades of transcriptional programs. The advance of genome technologies has made it possible to analyze cellular events on a global scale. A number of high-throughput techniques, such as DNA microarrays, chromatin immunoprecipitations, and yeast two-hybrid and mass-spectrometry analyses have been applied to cellular systems [1–10]. These experiments have provided first-draft catalogs of essential components, transcriptional regulatory diagrams, and molecular interaction maps for a number of organisms. In addition to providing a candidate list of biomolecules involved in biological processes, the high-throughput technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to derive underlying principles of how complex cellular networks are built and how network architectures contribute to phenotypes. A series of important questions in this area have been addressed recently (Figure 1). For example, what are the characteristics of cellular network structures that distinguish them from randomly generated networks? Are the network structures relevant for biological functions? If so, are they evolutionarily conserved and how do they evolve? Are some topological patterns preferred at certain times or conditions? These questions are analogous to those asked in the field of genome sequence analysis, such as identifying biologically relevant sequence motifs and domains, investigating the evolutionary conservation between sequences from different species, and understanding temporal or spatial specificities of regulatory sites. In this paper, we survey recent progress on addressing these questions and use mammalian cell signaling as case studies to discuss how computational analyses of networks shed light on specific biological processes. Figure 1 An Overview of Biological Network Analyses Based on “Omic” Data

[1]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Computational discovery of gene modules and regulatory networks , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  M. Vidal,et al.  Integrating 'omic' information: a bridge between genomics and systems biology. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[3]  George M Church,et al.  A network of transcriptionally coordinated functional modules in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2005, Genome research.

[4]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[5]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional Regulatory Networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Science.

[6]  Michal Linial,et al.  Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  Marc Vidal,et al.  Predictive models of molecular machines involved in Caenorhabditis elegans early embryogenesis , 2005, Nature.

[8]  L. Hood,et al.  Complementary Profiling of Gene Expression at the Transcriptome and Proteome Levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae*S , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[10]  N. Rajewsky microRNA target predictions in animals , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[11]  M. Vidal,et al.  Protein interaction maps for model organisms , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[12]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Monitoring dynamics of single-cell gene expression over multiple cell cycles , 2005, 2006 Bio Micro and Nanosystems Conference.

[13]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Tree-based reparameterization framework for analysis of sum-product and related algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  Formation of Regulatory Patterns During Signal Propagation in a Mammalian Cellular Network , 2005, Science.

[15]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Towards an Integrated Protein-Protein Interaction Network , 2005, RECOMB.

[16]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Networks Network Motifs : Simple Building Blocks of Complex , 2002 .

[17]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  A Genome-Wide Map of Conserved MicroRNA Targets in C. elegans , 2006, Current Biology.

[18]  Tom Minka,et al.  Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inference , 2001, UAI.

[19]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[20]  G. Church,et al.  Modular epistasis in yeast metabolism , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Z N Oltvai,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of motif constituents in the yeast protein interaction network , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Roded Sharan,et al.  Biclustering Algorithms: A Survey , 2007 .

[24]  M. Mann,et al.  Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  D. Pe’er,et al.  Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Using Graphical Models and Genomic Expression Data to Statistically Validate Models of Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2000, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[27]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Bayesian Learning in Undirected Graphical Models: Approximate MCMC Algorithms , 2004, UAI.

[28]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Time-resolved Mass Spectrometry of Tyrosine Phosphorylation Sites in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Network Reveals Dynamic Modules*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[29]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems , 1988 .

[30]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Bayesian Conditional Random Fields , 2005, AISTATS.

[31]  Alexander Schliep,et al.  Using hidden Markov models to analyze gene expression time course data , 2003, ISMB.

[32]  P. Bork,et al.  Dynamic Complex Formation During the Yeast Cell Cycle , 2005, Science.

[33]  Roger E Bumgarner,et al.  Integrated genomic and proteomic analyses of a systematically perturbed metabolic network. , 2001, Science.

[34]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Inferring Cellular Networks Using Probabilistic Graphical Models , 2004, Science.

[35]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[36]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Genomic analysis of regulatory network dynamics reveals large topological changes , 2004, Nature.

[37]  Brendan J. Frey,et al.  Denoising and Untangling Graphs Using Degree Priors , 2003, NIPS.

[38]  C. Burge,et al.  Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates that Thousands of Human Genes are MicroRNA Targets , 2005, Cell.

[39]  L. Williams,et al.  Contents , 2020, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[40]  H. Vaucheret,et al.  Functions of microRNAs and related small RNAs in plants , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[41]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast , 2005, Nature.

[42]  T. Ideker,et al.  Supporting Online Material for A Systems Approach to Mapping DNA Damage Response Pathways , 2006 .

[43]  Yuan Qi,et al.  Extending expectation propagation for graphical models , 2005 .

[44]  Alexander Rives,et al.  Modular organization of cellular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Sean R. Collins,et al.  Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Nature.

[46]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[47]  P. Bork,et al.  Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery , 2006, Nature.

[48]  A. Regev,et al.  Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  K. Sachs,et al.  Causal Protein-Signaling Networks Derived from Multiparameter Single-Cell Data , 2005, Science.

[50]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[51]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[52]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[53]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[54]  G. Drewes,et al.  Global approaches to protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[55]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Control of Pancreas and Liver Gene Expression by HNF Transcription Factors , 2004, Science.

[56]  Nicola J. Rinaldi,et al.  Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome , 2004, Nature.

[57]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  A Systems Model of Signaling Identifies a Molecular Basis Set for Cytokine-Induced Apoptosis , 2005, Science.

[58]  R. Karp,et al.  From the Cover : Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species , 2005 .

[59]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  Robert Gentleman,et al.  Local modeling of global interactome networks , 2005 .

[61]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Applied to the Yeast Pheromone Signaling Pathway*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[62]  J. Rothberg,et al.  Gaining confidence in high-throughput protein interaction networks , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[63]  O. Jensen Interpreting the protein language using proteomics , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[64]  E. Winzeler,et al.  Genomics, gene expression and DNA arrays , 2000, Nature.

[65]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.