A Framework for Understanding Mobile Telecommunications Market Innovation: A Case of China

ABSTRACT Most of the present research on the dynamics of mobile telecommunications market focuses on either technology innovation or service adoption. Drawing upon actor-network theory, we set up a framework that incorporates the two perspectives. We further apply this framework to dissect a case of China Telecom. The case study demonstrates that our model enables a systematic description on the mutual influence of infrastructure innovation and innovation adoption that moves beyond unilateral accounts. Moreover, our framework captures the interplay between mobile telecommunications market and its social network formed by the interrelated users, service providers and other related institutions. It is a useful too for the researchers to grasp a systematic understanding of mobile telecommunications development in China in particular, and in other countries in general. Keywords: Actor-network theory; Adoption; China; Infrastructure; Innovation; Mobile telecommunications market 1. Introduction In recent decades we have witnessed dramatic changes in mobile telecommunications technologies and services. This phenomnon raises wide research interests as the general availability and widespread adoption of advanced telecommunications technologies are linked to the economic potential of nations [Fransman, 2002]. However, research to date has largely focused on Western countries. This article analyzes mobile telecommunications market innovation in China, which has been relatively sidelined in this research term. China is the largest mobile telecommunications market in the world, which grows at one of the highest rates in the global scale. Constrained by its unique social environment, China's mobile telecommunications market has innovated in a particular way [Zhu, 2005]. For example, as we will read later in our case study in this article, in other countries the markets have changed from the second generation (2G) through the 2.5 generation (2.5G) to the third generation (3G); but in China, waiting for its indigenous 3G technologies to mature hence be used, the government has not issued the 3G licenses yet. Interestingly, we instead have seen the success of personal handyphone system (PHS), a cordless telephony technology generally treated as an extension of the fixed network. It is of practical interest to know the characteristics of mobile telecommunications market innovation in China and to disclose the driving forces to it. Indeed, this article does not limit its focus to the description of the Chinese experience. Instead, we have a more important purpose that is to make theoretical contribution. Specifically, we attempt to propose a framework that may help us understanding mobile telecommunications market innovation in China in particular, and in other countries in general. Normally, researchers investigate the dynamics of mobile telecommunications market from two distinct perspectives, either technology innovation or service adoption [Okazaki, 2005]. As an example of innovation studies, Edquist [2003] reports the results of a collection of papers that draw upon Systems of Innovation Theory to analyze the innovation of Internet and mobile technologies. Equally, there has also been considerable research carried out to explain the user adoption of mobile services [see e.g. Bauer, Barnes, Reichardt and Neumann, 2005; Pavlou and Chai, 2002; Pedersen, 2005], for which Diffusion of Innovation Theory [Rogers, 1995], and Theory of Reasoned Action [Ajzen, 1980] as well as its extensions like Technology Acceptance Model [Davis, 1989] and most recently the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) [Venkatesh, Morris, Davis and Davis, 2003], serve as major analytical tools. We argue that infrastructure innovation or service adoption perspectives alone can only partly explain the innovation in mobile telecommunications market [Okazaki, 2005]. Drawing upon actor-network theory, in this article we combine the two perspectives into one framework to pursue a holistic understanding of this phenomenon [Callon, 1991]. …

[1]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[2]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[3]  Andrew H. Van de Ven,et al.  A community perspective on the emergence of innovations , 1993 .

[4]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Around the cradle of the wireless revolution: the emergence and evolution of cellular telephony , 2002 .

[5]  Johannes M. Bauer Impact of license fees on the prices of mobile voice service , 2003 .

[6]  Shintaro Okazaki,et al.  New Perspectives on M-Commerce Research , 2005 .

[7]  Seth Young,et al.  MOBILE BUSINESS - COMPREHENSIVE MARKETING STRATEGIES OR MERELY IT EXPENSES? A CASE STUDY OF THE US AIRLINE INDUSTRY , 2005 .

[8]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[9]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[10]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Broadband and mobile opportunities: a socio-technical perspective , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Qing Yang,et al.  Xiaolingtong versus 3G in China: Which will be the winner? , 2006 .

[13]  Gerhard Rosegger The economics of production and innovation: An industrial perspective , 1980 .

[14]  Martin Fransman,et al.  Telecoms in the Internet Age: From Boom to Bust to? , 2002 .

[15]  S. Barnes,et al.  Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: a theoretical framework and empirical study , 2005 .

[16]  Ping Gao,et al.  Using actor‐network theory to analyse strategy formulation , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Contested artifact: technology sensemaking, actor networks, and the shaping of the Web browser , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[18]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[19]  W. Aspray,et al.  Inventing the internet , 1997, IEEE Spectrum.

[20]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Rising sun: iMode and the wireless Internet , 2003, CACM.

[21]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  What's Wrong with the Diffusion of Innovation Theory , 2001, Diffusing Software Products and Process Innovations.

[23]  R. Rettie,et al.  Adoption and usage of M-commerce: a cross-cultural comparison of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[24]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Infrastructure and Organizational Transformation: Classifying Nurses’ Work , 1996 .

[25]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[26]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[27]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[28]  Paul Ati ' Ewell TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[29]  J. Bauer,et al.  The European market for mobile data: evolving value chains and industry structures , 2002 .

[30]  Yan Chow Information technology innovation. , 2008, The Permanente journal.

[31]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems , 1992 .

[32]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  What Drives Electronic Commerce across Cultures? Across-Cultural Empirical Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[33]  W. Arthur Positive feedbacks in the economy , 1990 .

[34]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[36]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[37]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[38]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[39]  Charles D. Barrett Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[40]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[41]  G. Walsham Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[42]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  R. Wolfe ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS* , 1994 .

[44]  Xu Yan,et al.  Mobile data communications in China , 2003, CACM.