Event Detection and Phase Picking Using a Time-Domain Estimate of Predominate Period Tpd

We present a new approach for event detection and accurate determination of the onset time of seismic phases. We use a simple time-domain function ( T pd ), which is readily and efficiently calculated in real time. Our function is based on the T p function, which has been used to characterize the predominant period of a waveform and which was originally introduced by Nakamura (1988) for use in real-time magnitude estimation. We find that while T p itself produces changes at the onset of a seismic signal, it is not suitable for detecting seismic onsets. However, our modified damped predominant period function, T pd , has considerable potential for detecting such onsets. We show examples of waveforms with their corresponding T pd functions and demonstrate how the choice of parameters influences the function. The examples given show clear increases in T pd for both the P - and S -wave onsets. We implement an approach to determining seismic onsets based on the T pd function and call it the T pd picker. The T pd picker is trained, and we evaluate its performance on four days of continuous data. The T pd picker compares favorably with a trained short-term average/long-term average picker—there are improvements in the number of accurate picks but, more notably, there is a significant reduction in missed picks. We analyze the signal-to-noise ratios of the waveforms and find that the improvements are mainly, but not exclusively, for cases of high noise. The aforementioned facts, combined with the simplicity and efficiency of the T pd calculation, implies that there is considerable potential for its use as an automatic picker. The results also suggest that the T pd picker could be further improved by refining the position of the pick after a seismic phase has been detected.

[1]  Richard M. Allen,et al.  Single-Station Earthquake Characterization for Early Warning , 2005 .

[2]  Farid U. Dowla,et al.  Wavelet transform methods for phase identification in three-component seismograms , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  A Cichowicz,et al.  An automatic S-phase picker , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  Peter M. Shearer,et al.  Characterization of global seismograms using an automatic-picking algorithm , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[5]  Alberto Michelini,et al.  Automatic picking of P and S phases using a neural tree , 2006 .

[6]  H. Kanamori,et al.  The Potential for Earthquake Early Warning in Southern California , 2003, Science.

[7]  M. Leonard,et al.  Comparison of Manual and Automatic Onset Time Picking , 2000 .

[8]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Real-Time Seismology and Earthquake Damage Mitigation , 2005 .

[9]  Manfred Baer,et al.  An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events , 1987 .

[10]  Stavros M. Panas,et al.  PAI-S/K: A robust automatic seismic P phase arrival identification scheme , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  E. Mousset,et al.  A connectionist approach for automatic labeling of regional seismic phases using a single vertical component seismogram , 1996 .

[12]  R. V. Allen,et al.  Automatic earthquake recognition and timing from single traces , 1978, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  Manfred Joswig Pattern Recognition for Earthquake Detection , 1987, ASST.

[14]  Reinoud Sleeman,et al.  Robust automatic P-phase picking: an on-line implementation in the analysis of broadband seismogram recordings , 1999 .