Precision of Epithelial Defect Measurements

Purpose: To ensure optimal care of patients, cornea specialists measure corneal features, including epithelial defects (ED), with slit-lamp calipers. However, caliper measurements are subject to interphysician variability. We examined the extent of variability in ED measurements between cornea specialists and discuss the potential clinical impact. Methods: A total of 48 variably sized EDs were created in pig eyes. Three cornea specialists measured the maximum vertical and horizontal ED lengths to the nearest 10th of a millimeter using slit-lamp microscopy. An absolute difference in ED measurement between cornea specialists of 0.5 mm was chosen to be the a priori threshold for clinical significance and was evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Interrater reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The average absolute difference in the vertical ED length between pairs of examiners ranged from 0.54 to 0.63 mm, and that of the horizontal ED length ranged from 0.44 to 0.46 mm. These differences in ED measurement were not significantly different from 0.5 mm (all P > 0.06). However, pairs of examiners differed in vertical ED length measurements by >0.5 mm in 44% to 52% of EDs and by >1.0 mm in 13% to 17% of EDs. Pairs of examiners differed in horizontal ED length measurements by >0.5 mm in 31% to 40% of EDs and by >1.0 mm in 10% to 15% of EDs. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.77–0.91) for vertical and 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.90) for horizontal ED measurements. Conclusions: Cornea specialists showed good reliability in the measured EDs; however, depending on the threshold for clinical significance, a nontrivial percentage of cases have high interexaminer clinical variability.

[1]  Michael D Cohen,et al.  The published literature on handoffs in hospitals: deficiencies identified in an extensive review , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[2]  Michael Larsen,et al.  Diabetic macular edema assessed with optical coherence tomography and stereo fundus photography. , 2002, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Roper-Hall Mj Thermal and chemical burns. , 1965 .

[4]  Francesco Bandello,et al.  Optical coherence tomography versus stereoscopic fundus photography or biomicroscopy for diagnosing diabetic macular edema: a systematic review. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[5]  Mark J. Mannis,et al.  Cornea: Fundamentals, Diagnosis, and Management , 2011 .

[6]  J. Folch,et al.  New grading system for the evaluation of chronic ocular manifestations in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome , 2008 .

[7]  George A. Williams,et al.  Laser scanning imaging for macular disease: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Lambiase,et al.  Topical treatment with nerve growth factor for neurotrophic keratitis. , 2000, Ophthalmology.

[9]  Thomas Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[10]  M. González,et al.  Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group. , 1995, Archives of medical research.

[11]  S. Krajicek Epidemiology of Eye Related Emergency Department Visits , 2016 .

[12]  Frank Krummenauer,et al.  Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  J. Landers,et al.  Comparison of refractive outcomes using immersion ultrasound biometry and IOLMaster biometry , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[14]  M. H. Ensom,et al.  Post Hoc Power Analysis: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed? , 2001, Pharmacotherapy.

[15]  P. Lichter Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. , 1976, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[16]  Rebekka Heitmar,et al.  Comparison of subjective and objective methods to determine the retinal arterio-venous ratio using fundus photography. , 2015, Journal of optometry.

[17]  Jason J Nichols,et al.  Evaluation of Tear Film Interference Patterns and Measures of Tear Break-Up Time , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests than are power calculations , 2003 .

[19]  T. Brennan,et al.  Does Housestaff Discontinuity of Care Increase the Risk for Preventable Adverse Events? , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.