Causes of failure of a barcode‐based pretransfusion check at the bedside: experience in a university hospital

summary The objective of this study was to assess the cause of failure of bedside barcode identification before blood administration. The bedside check is the most critical step for prevention of mistransfusion. A barcode patient‐blood unit identification system was implemented in all inpatient wards, operating rooms and an outpatient haematology unit in July 2002. The transfusion service monitored compliance with bedside barcode identification and checked it at 24 h or 1 h after issuing of blood. If electronic checking was not completed at that time, the transfusion service clarified the cause of failure and indicated the immediate use of the issued blood when it was not yet transfused. From April 2004 to December 2007, a total of 43 068 blood components were transfused without a single mistransfusion and 958 transfusions (2·2%) were performed without electronic checking. The overall compliance rate with bedside barcode identification was 97·8%, and it was 99·5% in the past 6 months. The cause of failure of bedside barcode identification was human error in 811 cases (84·7%), handheld device error in 74 (7·7%), system error in 50 (5·2%) and wristband error in 23 (2·4%). The number of errors leading to failure of bedside barcode identification was decreased for human errors, especially manipulation errors, after initiation of notification at 1 h after issuing of blood. The transfusion service may have an important role in increasing transfusion safety by monitoring compliance with bedside verification and bedside use of issued blood.

[1]  A E Voytovich,et al.  Transfusion errors in New York State: an analysis of 10 years' experience , 2000, Transfusion.

[2]  H. Cohen,et al.  Serious hazards of transfusion: a decade of hemovigilance in the UK. , 2006, Transfusion medicine reviews.

[3]  Jonathan Kay,et al.  End‐to‐end electronic control of the hospital transfusion process to increase the safety of blood transfusion: strengths and weaknesses , 2006, Transfusion.

[4]  N. J. Jensen,et al.  An automated system for bedside verification of the match between patient identification and blood unit identification , 1996, Transfusion.

[5]  Knowles,et al.  The administration of blood and blood components and the management of transfused patients , 1999, Transfusion medicine.

[6]  Walter H Dzik,et al.  New technology for transfusion safety , 2007, British journal of haematology.

[7]  Walter H Dzik,et al.  Emily Cooley Lecture 2002: transfusion safety in the hospital , 2003, Transfusion.

[8]  K. Sazama,et al.  Reports of 355 transfusion‐associated deaths: 1976 through 1985 , 1990, Transfusion.

[9]  Karen A Miller,et al.  Audit of transfusion procedures in 660 hospitals. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of patient identification and vital sign monitoring frequencies in 16494 transfusions. , 2003, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[10]  Michael F Murphy.  Application of bar code technology at the bedside: the Oxford experience , 2007, Transfusion.

[11]  A. Casbard,et al.  Barcode technology: its role in increasing the safety of blood transfusion , 2003, Transfusion.

[12]  Toshiya Ohsawa,et al.  A computer‐assisted transfusion management system and changed transfusion practices contribute to appropriate management of blood components , 2008, Transfusion.

[13]  P. Chow,et al.  Use of an electronic barcode system for patient identification during blood transfusion: 3-year experience in a regional hospital. , 2004, Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi.

[14]  Douglas Watson,et al.  Blood transfusion administration—one‐ or two‐person checks: which is the safest method? , 2008, Transfusion.

[15]  S. Lewis.  British Committee for Standards in Haematology , 1969 .