Tests of the mouse visual system

Abstract. To apply the approach of forward genetics (e.g., gene identification with mutagenesis and screening, followed by positional cloning) to the mouse, it is necessary to have available screening tests that can be applied rapidly to individual mice and that give a reliable assessment of visual function. This paper reviews the strengths and limitations of two anatomical tests related to visual function, fundus examination and retinal histological examination. Two tests that do not depend on behavior of a conscious animal are reviewed: the electroretinogram and the visual evoked potentials of the cortex. Eight behavioral tests are also summarized: maze-based tests, cued fear conditioning, tests based on conditioned suppression, visual placing, optokinetic nystagmus, pupillary reflex, and light-induced shifts in circadian phase. It is recommended that retinal histology, the electroretinogram, and visual-evoked potentials be used at the present time for screening because they assess the function and structure of the visual system rapidly and reliably. In fact, the electroretinogram (or visually evoked potentials) can be recorded from several animals simultaneously in response to the same stimulus. It is also recommended that efforts be made to develop more appropriate, automated, behavioral tests of visual perception than are now available, particularly tests that rely solely on rewarding visually evoked behavior. Two other promising behavioral tests are cued fear conditioning and variants of maze tests.

[1]  C. Karwoski,et al.  Current source density analysis of retinal field potentials. II. Pharmacological analysis of the b-wave and M-wave. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Alcino J. Silva,et al.  Deficient Plasticity in the Primary Visual Cortex of α-Calcium/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II Mutant Mice , 1996, Neuron.

[3]  James C. Smith.  Conditioned Suppression as an Animal Psychophysical Technique , 1970 .

[4]  I Kato,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells related to optokinetic nystagmus in the rat. , 1992, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  The behavioural analysis of animal vision , 1998 .

[6]  W. Boyes,et al.  Surface distribution of flash-evoked and pattern reversal-evoked potentials in hooded rats , 1987, Brain Research Bulletin.

[7]  E. Pugh,et al.  The Origin of the Major Rod- and Cone-Driven Components of the Rodent Electroretinogram and the Effect of Age and Light-Rearing History on the Magnitude of These Components , 1998 .

[8]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Differential contribution of amygdala and hippocampus to cued and contextual fear conditioning. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  T. Williams,et al.  Retinal damage in pigmented and albino rats exposed to low levels of cyclic light following a single mydriatic treatment. , 1985, Current eye research.

[10]  M. Millodot,et al.  Retinoscopy and Eye Size , 1970, Science.

[11]  R. Foster,et al.  Regulation of mammalian circadian behavior by non-rod, non-cone, ocular photoreceptors. , 1999, Science.

[12]  A. Ducati,et al.  Neuronal generators of the visual evoked potentials: intracerebral recording in awake humans. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  L. Maffei,et al.  Vision in mice with neuronal redundancy due to inhibition of developmental cell death , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Fox.  The visual cliff test for the study of visual depth perception in the mouse. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[15]  A. C. Collins,et al.  A simple genetic basis for a complex psychological trait in laboratory mice , 1995, Science.

[16]  Richard Paylor,et al.  Behavioral dissociations between C57BL/6 and DBA/2 mice on learning and memory tasks: A hippocampal-dysfunction hypothesis , 1993, Psychobiology.

[17]  M. Lavail,et al.  Strain differences in sensitivity to light-induced photoreceptor degeneration in albino mice. , 1987, Current eye research.

[18]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  Transfer properties of the lateral geniculate body. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  L. Maffei,et al.  The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs , 1999, Vision Research.

[20]  E. Pugh,et al.  UV- and Midwave-Sensitive Cone-Driven Retinal Responses of the Mouse: A Possible Phenotype for Coexpression of Cone Photopigments , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  J B Hurley,et al.  Abnormal photoresponses and light-induced apoptosis in rods lacking rhodopsin kinase. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Foster,et al.  Regulation of the mammalian pineal by non-rod, non-cone, ocular photoreceptors. , 1999, Science.

[23]  F. Naarendorp,et al.  The d-wave of the rod electroretinogram of rat originates in the cone pathway , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Hood,et al.  Beta wave of the scotopic (rod) electroretinogram as a measure of the activity of human on-bipolar cells. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  E. Pugh,et al.  Extreme responsiveness of the pupil of the dark-adapted mouse to steady retinal illumination. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  L. Frishman,et al.  Light-evoked increases in [K+]o in proximal portion of the dark-adapted cat retina. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  L. Pinto,et al.  Visually evoked eye movements in mouse mutants and inbred strains. A screening report. , 1984, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  L. Pinto,et al.  Electrophysiology of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse: a study of a normally pigmented mouse and a congenic hypopigmentation mutant, pearl. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  L. Frishman,et al.  Scotopic threshold response of proximal retina in cat. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Baylor,et al.  Control of rhodopsin activity in vision , 1998, Eye.

[31]  G. Balkema,et al.  Characterization of abnormalities in the visual system of the mutant mouse pearl , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  B. Knave,et al.  The effect of barbiturate on retinal functions. I. Effects on the conventional electroretinogram of the sheep eye. , 1974, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[33]  Denis A. Baylor,et al.  Prolonged photoresponses in transgenic mouse rods lacking arrestin , 1997, Nature.

[34]  N. Mangini,et al.  Discrete visual defects in pearl mutant mice. , 1983, Science.

[35]  W. Boyes,et al.  Focal lesions of visual cortex—Effects on visual evoked potentials in rats , 1987, Experimental Neurology.

[36]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Pattern and motion vision in cats with selective loss of cortical directional selectivity , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  J. Takahashi,et al.  Chapter 2.1.7 Genetic dissection of mouse behavior using induced mutagenesis , 1999 .

[38]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular responses of the Müller (glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to b-wave of the electroretinogram. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  C. Rossi-Arnaud,et al.  Learning in inbred mice: Strain-specific abilities across three radial maze problems , 1993, Behavior Genetics.

[40]  G. M. Strain,et al.  Flash and pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in C57BL/6J and B6CBAF1/J mice , 1993, Brain Research Bulletin.

[41]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Vernier acuity of normal and visually deprived cats , 1991, Vision Research.

[42]  L. Pinto,et al.  Visually evoked eye movements in the mouse (Mus musculus) , 1976, Vision Research.

[43]  C. M. Cicerone,et al.  Cells in the pretectal olivary nucleus are in the pathway for the direct light reflex of the pupil in the rat , 1984, Brain Research.

[44]  Y. Goto,et al.  Functional consequences of oncogene-induced photoreceptor degeneration in transgenic mice , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[45]  D. Baylor,et al.  Phospholipase C β4 is involved in modulating the visual response in mice , 1996 .

[46]  M. Naash,et al.  Rod phototransduction in transgenic mice expressing a mutant opsin gene. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[47]  J. Wehner,et al.  Assessment of learning by the Morris water task and fear conditioning in inbred mouse strains and F1 hybrids: implications of genetic background for single gene mutations and quantitative trait loci analyses , 1997, Neuroscience.

[48]  M. Kraut,et al.  Intracortical generators of the flash VEP in monkeys. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[49]  J. W. Vanable,et al.  Retinopretectal and accessory optic projections of normal mice and the OKN‐defective mutant mice beige, beige‐J, and pearl , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[50]  J. Hayes,et al.  Visual thresholds in mice: Comparison of retinal light damage and hypopigmentation , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[51]  A. Kaneko,et al.  Transient calcium current of retinal bipolar cells of the mouse. , 1989, Neuroscience research. Supplement : the official journal of the Japan Neuroscience Society.

[52]  D. Hubel,et al.  Studies of visual function and its decay in mice with hereditary retinal degeneration , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[53]  M. Lavail,et al.  Rods and cones in the mouse retina. I. Structural analysis using light and electron microscopy , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[54]  M. Lavail,et al.  A naturally occurring mouse model of X-linked congenital stationary night blindness. , 1998, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[55]  Barbara A. Ray,et al.  Psychophysical Testing of Neurologic Mutant Mice , 1970 .

[56]  N. Mangini,et al.  The optokinetic nystagmus and ocular pigmentation of hypopigmented mouse mutants , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[57]  L. Pinto,et al.  Response properties of ganglion cells in the isolated mouse retina , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[58]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Correlation of dynamic responses in the ON bipolar neuron and theb-wave of the electroretinogram , 1995, Vision Research.

[59]  P. Sieving,et al.  A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[60]  J. Takahashi,et al.  Sensitivity and integration in a visual pathway for circadian entrainment in the hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[61]  D. Baylor,et al.  Phospholipase C beta 4 is involved in modulating the visual response in mice. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  D. G. Green,et al.  Correlation of light-induced changes in retinal extracellular potassium concentration with c-wave of the electroretinogram. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[63]  R. Douglas,et al.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats , 2000, Vision Research.

[64]  D. P. King,et al.  Mutagenesis and mapping of a mouse gene, Clock, essential for circadian behavior. , 1994, Science.

[65]  L. Pinto,et al.  Synaptic lamellae of the photoreceptors of pearl and wild-type mice. , 1985, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[66]  M P Stryker,et al.  Experience-Dependent Plasticity of Binocular Responses in the Primary Visual Cortex of the Mouse , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  R. Moore,et al.  A retinohypothalamic projection in the rat , 1972, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[68]  M. Stryker,et al.  Local GABA circuit control of experience-dependent plasticity in developing visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[69]  D. Lindsley,et al.  Visually Evoked Electrocortical Responses in Kittens: Development of Specific and Nonspecific Systems , 1965, Science.

[70]  M. Slaughter,et al.  Comparison of the waveforms of the ON bipolar neuron and the b -wave of the electroretinogram , 1993, Vision Research.

[71]  E. Pugh,et al.  Recovery phase of the murine rod photoresponse reconstructed from electroretinographic recordings , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[72]  Joseph E LeDoux.  Fear and the brain: where have we been, and where are we going? , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[73]  Raymond D. Lund,et al.  The retinal ganglion cells that drive the pupilloconstrictor response in rats , 1998, Brain Research.

[74]  G. H. Jacobs,et al.  Retinal receptors in rodents maximally sensitive to ultraviolet light , 1991, Nature.

[75]  G. H. Jacobs,et al.  Regional variations in the relative sensitivity to UV light in the mouse retina , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[76]  G. W. Balkema,et al.  Increased absolute light sensitivity in Himalayan mice with cold-induced ocular pigmentation , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[77]  M. Lavail,et al.  Genetic regulation of light damage to photoreceptors. , 1987, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[78]  U. Dräger,et al.  Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[79]  J. Takahashi,et al.  Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse. , 1994, Science.

[80]  L. Pinto,et al.  Response properties of horizontal cells in the isolated retina of wild- type and pearl mutant mice , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[81]  H. Barlow,et al.  MAINTAINED ACTIVITY IN THE CAT'S RETINA IN LIGHT AND DARKNESS , 1957, The Journal of general physiology.

[82]  D. Baylor,et al.  Role for the target enzyme in deactivation of photoreceptor G protein in vivo. , 1998, Science.

[83]  D E Mitchell,et al.  A Behavioural Technique for the Rapid Assessment of the Visual Capabilities of Kittens , 1977, Perception.

[84]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat , 1985, Vision Research.

[85]  L. Pinto,et al.  Receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in the spastic mutant mouse. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[86]  J. Robson,et al.  Response linearity and kinetics of the cat retina: The bipolar cell component of the dark-adapted electroretinogram , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[87]  J. Robson,et al.  Photoreceptor and bipolar cell contributions to the cat electroretinogram: a kinetic model for the early part of the flash response. , 1996, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[88]  D B Lindsley,et al.  Development of visually evoked potentials in kittens: specific and nonspecific responses. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[89]  U. Dräger,et al.  Receptive fields of single cells and topography in mouse visual cortex , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[90]  T. Williams,et al.  The role of ocular pigmentation in protecting against retinal light damage , 1980, Vision Research.

[91]  U. Dräger,et al.  Observations on the organization of the visual cortex in the reeler mouse , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[92]  D. Tauck,et al.  Characterization of GABA- and glycine-induced currents of solitary rodent retinal ganglion cells in culture , 1988, Neuroscience.