Hourly diffuse and direct solar irradiance data are required for weather files used in building energy simulation as well as Photovoltaic and solar thermal calculations. Access to up to date hourly observation data or satellite derived data for these parameters is currently only available for a selection of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology measurement locations. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of the methods used to estimate solar irradiance data from meteorological observations either in the absence of observed irradiance data or when irradiance observations are limited to global irradiance. In particular the focus of this paper is to investigate the accuracy of the process of coupling together global and direct/diffuse models. Five global and four diffuse/direct irradiance models are presented and compared to experimental data for four locations in Australia. In the case where experimental global irradiance data is available, values are used as input into various models to obtain diffuse and direct irradiance. In the absence of experimental irradiance data, the approach taken is to estimate global irradiance with a separate model and then feed these values into the diffuse/direct models. The errors associated with both of these approaches are investigated by comparing the modelled diffuse and direct irradiance values with known experimental data for four Australian locations over a period of a number of years. This study indicates that no single diffuse/direct irradiance model consistently outperformed the other models at estimating diffuse and direct irradiance whilst the Zhang and Huang global irradiance model with coefficients from Seo and Huang achieved the best estimates of global irradiance for the locations investigated. For the approach where global irradiance is estimated from a model, the resulting direct and diffuse data was found to differ significantly from the experimental data. The results indicate that the individual models that achieved the best estimates of global irradiance did not achieve the best estimates of diffuse and direct irradiance when coupled with a diffuse/direct model.
[1]
R. E. Bird,et al.
Review, Evaluation, and Improvement of Direct Irradiance Models
,
1981
.
[2]
Gerhard Czeplak,et al.
Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of cloud
,
1980
.
[3]
J. L. Torres,et al.
Comparative study of various models in estimating hourly diffuse solar irradiance
,
2010
.
[4]
W. W. Moriarty.
Estimation of solar radiation from Australian meteorological observations
,
1991
.
[5]
E. Maxwell.
A quasi-physical model for converting hourly global horizontal to direct normal insolation
,
1987
.
[6]
Tetsuo Hayashi,et al.
PROCEDURES FOR SEPARATING DIRECT AND DIFFUSE INSOLATION ON A HORIZONTAL SURFACE AND PREDICTION OF INSOLATION ON TILTED SURFACES
,
1983
.
[7]
Joe Huang,et al.
DEVELOPMENT OF TYPICAL YEAR WEATHER DATA FOR CHINESE LOCATIONS
,
2002
.
[8]
M. Krarti,et al.
Comparative analysis of three solar models for Tunisia
,
2006
.
[9]
J. Olseth,et al.
An hourly diffuse fraction model with correction for variability and surface albedo
,
1998
.
[10]
John Boland,et al.
Modelling of diffuse solar fraction with multiple predictors
,
2010
.
[11]
W. Beckman,et al.
Diffuse fraction correlations
,
1990
.
[12]
V. Badescu.
Modeling Solar Radiation at the Earth’s Surface
,
2008
.
[13]
P. Ineichen,et al.
Dynamic global-to-direct irradiance conversion models
,
1992
.
[14]
R. L. Hulstrom,et al.
Direct insolation models
,
1980
.
[15]
Qingyuan Zhang,et al.
Development of the typical meteorological database for Chinese locations
,
2006
.