An Exploration of Voter Responses to Political Advertisements

Abstract This study was designed to investigate the reactions of voters to political advertisements. Using the 1988 presidential campaign as the focus, advertisements were developed for both the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. Results suggest that the use of comparative (sponsor-positive and opponent-negative) or simple opponent-negative political ads produces negative reactions from voters, reflects negatively on the ad sponsor, and has little impact upon the opposing candidate when compared to sponsor-positive ads. Further, data from the attitude toward the ad measures suggest that comparative and opponent-negative ads may convey an image of the political process that is consistent with voters' negative perceptions, and may be perceived as entertaining. Implications for future political advertising campaigns and research are discussed.

[1]  Julie A. Edell,et al.  The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition , 1989 .

[2]  R. Dale Wilson,et al.  Emotional Feelings and Attitude toward the Advertisement: The Roles of Brand Familarity and Repetition , 1988 .

[3]  Darrel D. Muehling.  Comparative Advertising: The Influence of Attitude-toward-the-Ad on Brand Evaluation , 1987 .

[4]  J. Edell,et al.  The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects , 1987 .

[5]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[6]  Alexis S. Tan.  Mass communication theories and research , 1985 .

[7]  Sharyne. Merritt.  Negative Political Advertising: Some Empirical Findings , 1984 .

[8]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  The Impact of Comparative Advertising on Perception and Attitude: Some Positive Findings , 1984 .

[9]  G. Belch,et al.  An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance , 1981 .

[10]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[11]  Terence A. Shimp.  Attitude toward the AD as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice , 1981 .

[12]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  The Interaction between Comparative Advertising and Copy Claim Variation , 1981 .

[13]  Michael Etgar,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Comparative Advertising: Impact of Message Appeal, Information Load, and Utility of Product Class , 1980 .

[14]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  The Effects of Comparative Advertising Mediated by Market Position of Sponsoring Brand , 1978 .

[15]  V. K. Prasad.  Communications-Effectiveness of Comparative Advertising: A Laboratory Analysis , 1976 .

[16]  Philip Kotler,et al.  Targeting Prospects for a New Product , 1976 .

[17]  R. D. Wilson.  An Empirical Evaluation of Comparative Advertising Messages: Subjects' Responses on Perceptual Dimensions , 1976 .

[18]  William L. Wilkie,et al.  Comparison Advertising: Problems and Potential , 1975 .

[19]  J. R. Lynn.  Professionalism is a State of Mind , 1974 .

[20]  Peter L. Wright,et al.  The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising , 1973 .