Biomarkers of genome instability in normal mammalian genomes following drug‐induced replication stress

Genome instability is a hallmark of most human cancers and is exacerbated following replication stress. However, the effects that drugs/xenobiotics have in promoting genome instability including chromosomal structural rearrangements in normal cells are not currently assessed in the genetic toxicology battery. Here, we show that drug‐induced replication stress leads to increased genome instability in vitro using proliferating primary human cells as well as in vivo in rat bone marrow (BM) and duodenum (DD). p53‐binding protein 1 (53BP1, biomarker of DNA damage repair) nuclear bodies were increased in a dose‐dependent manner in normal proliferating human mammary epithelial fibroblasts following treatment with compounds traditionally classified as either genotoxic (hydralazine) and nongenotoxic (low‐dose aphidicolin, duvelisib, idelalisib, and amiodarone). Comparatively, no increases in 53BP1 nuclear bodies were observed in nonproliferating cells. Negative control compounds (mannitol, alosteron, diclofenac, and zonisamide) not associated with cancer risk did not induce 53BP1 nuclear bodies in any cell type. Finally, we studied the in vivo genomic consequences of drug‐induced replication stress in rats treated with 10 mg/kg of cyclophosphamide for up to 14 days followed by polymerase chain reaction‐free whole genome sequencing (30X coverage) of BM and DD cells. Cyclophosphamide induced chromosomal structural rearrangements at an average of 90 genes, including 40 interchromosomal/intrachromosomal translocations, within 2 days of treatment. Collectively, these data demonstrate that this drug‐induced genome instability test (DiGIT) can reveal potential adverse effects of drugs not otherwise informed by standard genetic toxicology testing batteries. These efforts are aligned with the food and drug administration's (FDA's) predictive toxicology roadmap initiative.

[1]  Scott R. Kennedy,et al.  Next‐Generation Genotoxicology: Using Modern Sequencing Technologies to Assess Somatic Mutagenesis and Cancer Risk , 2019, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[2]  D. Cortez Replication-Coupled DNA Repair. , 2019, Molecular cell.

[3]  S. Boulton,et al.  Mechanisms of Oncogene-Induced Replication Stress: Jigsaw Falling into Place. , 2018, Cancer discovery.

[4]  Y. Liu,et al.  Human cancer cells utilize mitotic DNA synthesis to resist replication stress at telomeres regardless of their telomere maintenance mechanism , 2018, Oncotarget.

[5]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Application of the key characteristics of carcinogens in cancer hazard identification , 2018, Carcinogenesis.

[6]  G. Nalepa,et al.  Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship , 2018, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[7]  Renke Pan,et al.  TNscope: Accurate Detection of Somatic Mutations with Haplotype-based Variant Candidate Detection and Machine Learning Filtering , 2018, bioRxiv.

[8]  M. Stratton,et al.  Alcohol and endogenous aldehydes damage chromosomes and mutate stem cells , 2018, Nature.

[9]  M. Fielden,et al.  Modernizing Human Cancer Risk Assessment of Therapeutics. , 2017, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[10]  Arcadi Navarro,et al.  A 3-way hybrid approach to generate a new high-quality chimpanzee reference genome (Pan_tro_3.0) , 2017, GigaScience.

[11]  G. Walker,et al.  Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis , 2017, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[12]  F. Alt,et al.  Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) δ blockade increases genomic instability in B cells , 2017, Nature.

[13]  I. Hickson,et al.  RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[14]  R. Advani,et al.  Contempo: Preliminary Results in First-Line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma with the Oral Dual PI3K-δ,γ Inhibitor, Duvelisib, in Combination with Rituximab or Obinutuzumab , 2016 .

[15]  R. Greenberg,et al.  Break-induced telomere synthesis underlies alternative telomere maintenance , 2016, Nature.

[16]  T. Maclachlan,et al.  Derisking Drug-Induced Carcinogenicity for Novel Therapeutics. , 2016, Trends in cancer.

[17]  Gábor E. Tusnády,et al.  A comprehensive survey of the mutagenic impact of common cancer cytotoxics , 2016, Genome Biology.

[18]  A. Elcock,et al.  Dynamic binding of replication protein a is required for DNA repair , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[19]  K. Schulze-Osthoff,et al.  The antihypertensive drug hydralazine activates the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis and causes DNA damage in leukemic T cells , 2016, Oncotarget.

[20]  Y. Liu,et al.  Replication stress activates DNA repair synthesis in mitosis , 2015, Nature.

[21]  Ivan Rusyn,et al.  Key Characteristics of Carcinogens as a Basis for Organizing Data on Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis , 2015, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  S. Jackson,et al.  A flow cytometry–based method to simplify the analysis and quantification of protein association to chromatin in mammalian cells , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[23]  R. M. Owen,et al.  An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies , 2015, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  Y. Oki,et al.  Lenalidomide, idelalisib, and rituximab are unacceptably toxic in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent lymphoma. , 2015, Blood.

[25]  R. P. Araldi,et al.  Using the comet and micronucleus assays for genotoxicity studies: A review. , 2015, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[26]  Y. Wako,et al.  Evaluation of the repeated dose liver micronucleus assay using young adult rats with cyclophosphamide monohydrate: a report of a collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS.MMS. , 2015, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[27]  A. Maeda,et al.  Evaluation of the repeated-dose liver micronucleus assay using 2,4-dinitrotoluene: a report of a collaborative study by CSGMT/JEMS.MMS. , 2015, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[28]  T. E. Wilson,et al.  Large transcription units unify copy number variants and common fragile sites arising under replication stress , 2015, Genome research.

[29]  Thanos D Halazonetis,et al.  DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. , 2015, Annual review of pathology.

[30]  Sonali M. Smith,et al.  Unexpected and Serious Toxicity Observed with Combined Idelalisib, Lenalidomide and Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Lymphomas: Alliance A051201 and A051202 , 2014 .

[31]  Michal Zimmermann,et al.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair. , 2014, Trends in cell biology.

[32]  K. Cimprich,et al.  Causes and consequences of replication stress , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  Wassim H. Fares Amiodarone and the Risk of Cancer : , 2013 .

[34]  Rodney Rothstein,et al.  Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. , 2013, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[35]  Y. Liu,et al.  MUS81 promotes common fragile site expression , 2013, Nature Cell Biology.

[36]  F. Alt,et al.  53BP1 Mediates Productive and Mutagenic DNA Repair through Distinct Phosphoprotein Interactions , 2013, Cell.

[37]  Tzeng-Ji Chen,et al.  Amiodarone and the risk of cancer , 2013, Cancer.

[38]  V. Silnikov,et al.  New synthetic substrates of mammalian nucleotide excision repair system , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  Jesse J. Salk,et al.  Detection of ultra-rare mutations by next-generation sequencing , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Pablo Cingolani,et al.  © 2012 Landes Bioscience. Do not distribute. , 2022 .

[41]  Y. Dubrova,et al.  Exposure to anticancer drugs can result in transgenerational genomic instability in mice , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  C. Cole,et al.  COSMIC: the catalogue of somatic mutations in cancer , 2011, Genome Biology.

[43]  D. Kirkland,et al.  Evaluation of a multi-endpoint assay in rats, combining the bone-marrow micronucleus test, the Comet assay and the flow-cytometric peripheral blood micronucleus test. , 2011, Mutation research.

[44]  M. Schuler,et al.  The rat gut micronucleus assay: A good choice for alternative in vivo genetic toxicology testing strategies , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[45]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[46]  B. Neumann,et al.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  53BP1 regulates DNA resection and the choice between classical and alternative end joining during class switch recombination , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[48]  K. Witt,et al.  Dose-response assessment of four genotoxic chemicals in a combined mouse and rat micronucleus (MN) and Comet assay protocol. , 2010, The Journal of toxicological sciences.

[49]  Ian D. Hickson,et al.  RecQ helicases: multifunctional genome caretakers , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[50]  J. Lupski,et al.  The DNA replication FoSTeS/MMBIR mechanism can generate genomic, genic and exonic complex rearrangements in humans , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[51]  Jeremy M. Stark,et al.  Alternative-NHEJ Is a Mechanistically Distinct Pathway of Mammalian Chromosome Break Repair , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[52]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop. , 2008, Mutation research.

[53]  S. Suissa,et al.  Hematologic malignant neoplasms after drug exposure in rheumatoid arthritis. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[54]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Zhigang Wang DNA Damage and Mutagenesis , 2007 .

[56]  Jay H. Chung,et al.  53BP1 is associated with replication protein A and is required for RPA2 hyperphosphorylation following DNA damage , 2005, Oncogene.

[57]  T. Ørntoft,et al.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis , 2005, Nature.

[58]  Dimitris Kletsas,et al.  Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions , 2005, Nature.

[59]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[60]  E. Rogakou,et al.  DNA Double-stranded Breaks Induce Histone H2AX Phosphorylation on Serine 139* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[61]  Division on Earth Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , 1996 .

[62]  J. Anderson,et al.  Use of cyclophosphamide as a positive control in dominant lethal and micronucleus assays. , 1995, Mutation research.

[63]  C. Kwoh,et al.  Effects of cyclophosphamide on the development of malignancy and on long-term survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A 20-year followup study. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[64]  L. Povirk,et al.  DNA damage and mutagenesis induced by nitrogen mustards. , 1994, Mutation research.

[65]  S. Kawanishi,et al.  Free radical production and site-specific DNA damage induced by hydralazine in the presence of metal ions or peroxidase/hydrogen peroxide. , 1991, Biochemical pharmacology.

[66]  G. Mazza,et al.  Lack of mutagenicity and metabolic inactivation of aphidicolin by rat liver microsomes. , 1980, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[67]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Updated recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests. , 2016, Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis.

[68]  A. D’Andrea,et al.  Repair Pathway Choices and Consequences at the Double-Strand Break. , 2016, Trends in cell biology.

[69]  J. Baizer,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Animals We followed the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , 2015 .

[70]  A. Doherty The in vitro micronucleus assay. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[71]  R. Larson Etiology and management of therapy-related myeloid leukemia. , 2007, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[72]  T. Glover,et al.  DNA polymerase α inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes , 2004, Human Genetics.

[73]  C. Kaplan Use of the Laboratory , 1990 .

[74]  Sladek Ne Metabolism of oxazaphosphorines , 1988 .