A multi-scaled approach for simulating chemical reaction systems.

In this paper we give an overview of some very recent work, as well as presenting a new approach, on the stochastic simulation of multi-scaled systems involving chemical reactions. In many biological systems (such as genetic regulation and cellular dynamics) there is a mix between small numbers of key regulatory proteins, and medium and large numbers of molecules. In addition, it is important to be able to follow the trajectories of individual molecules by taking proper account of the randomness inherent in such a system. We describe different types of simulation techniques (including the stochastic simulation algorithm, Poisson Runge-Kutta methods and the balanced Euler method) for treating simulations in the three different reaction regimes: slow, medium and fast. We then review some recent techniques on the treatment of coupled slow and fast reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics and present a new approach which couples the three regimes mentioned above. We then apply this approach to a biologically inspired problem involving the expression and activity of LacZ and LacY proteins in E. coli, and conclude with a discussion on the significance of this work.

[1]  Gregory D. Peterson,et al.  Accelerating Gene Regulatory Network Modeling Using Grid-Based Simulation , 2004, Simul..

[2]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[3]  T Shimada,et al.  Random monoallelic expression of three genes clustered within 60 kb of mouse t complex genomic DNA. , 2001, Genome research.

[4]  References , 1971 .

[5]  Andrzej M. Kierzek,et al.  STOCKS: STOChastic Kinetic Simulations of biochemical systems with Gillespie algorithm , 2002, Bioinform..

[6]  Hugh Davson,et al.  PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS , 1961 .

[7]  D. Gillespie Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems , 2001 .

[8]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[9]  H. Resat,et al.  Probability-Weighted Dynamic Monte Carlo Method for Reaction Kinetics Simulations , 2001 .

[10]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  The composite Euler method for stiff stochastic differential equations , 2001 .

[11]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  Poisson Runge-Kutta methods for chemical reaction systems , 2004 .

[12]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  A Grid Implementation of Chemical Kinetic Simulation Methods in Genetic Regulation , 2003 .

[13]  K. Burrage,et al.  Bistability and switching in the lysis/lysogeny genetic regulatory network of bacteriophage lambda. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Tianhai Tian,et al.  Implicit Taylor methods for stiff stochastic differential equations , 2001 .

[15]  E. Platen,et al.  Balanced Implicit Methods for Stiff Stochastic Systems , 1998 .

[16]  C. J. Morton-firth Stochastic simulation of cell signaling pathways , 1998 .

[17]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Pamela Burrage,et al.  Runge-Kutta methods for stochastic differential equations , 1999 .

[19]  James M. Bower,et al.  Computational modeling of genetic and biochemical networks , 2001 .

[20]  Muruhan Rathinam,et al.  Stiffness in stochastic chemically reacting systems: The implicit tau-leaping method , 2003 .

[21]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic kinetic analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage lambda-infected Escherichia coli cells. , 1998, Genetics.

[23]  A. Arkin,et al.  It's a noisy business! Genetic regulation at the nanomolar scale. , 1999, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[25]  Jamie Alcock,et al.  A note on the Balanced method , 2006 .

[26]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[27]  D. Gillespie Markov Processes: An Introduction for Physical Scientists , 1991 .

[28]  Dan ie l T. Gil lespie A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation , 1992 .

[29]  C. Rao,et al.  Stochastic chemical kinetics and the quasi-steady-state assumption: Application to the Gillespie algorithm , 2003 .

[30]  D. Hume,et al.  Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. , 2000, Blood.

[31]  W. Fontana,et al.  Small Numbers of Big Molecules , 2002, Science.

[32]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[33]  P. Maini,et al.  A Century of Enzyme Kinetics: Reliability of the K M and v v max Estimates , 2003 .

[34]  S. Schnell,et al.  Reaction kinetics in intracellular environments with macromolecular crowding: simulations and rate laws. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[35]  R. Brent,et al.  Modelling cellular behaviour , 2001, Nature.

[36]  J. Rawlings,et al.  Approximate simulation of coupled fast and slow reactions for stochastic chemical kinetics , 2002 .