A two-step approach for relating tapered element oscillating microbalance and dichotomous air sampler PM2.5 measurements

A method for transforming continuous monitoring (CM) fine particulate matter (aerodynamic diameter <2.5 μm; PM2.5) data (i.e., by tapered element oscillating microbalance [TEOM]) obtained from the Canadian National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) program to meet the data quality objective (DQO) of R2 > 0.8 against the co-located federal reference method (i.e., dichotomous air sampler) is described. By using a two-step linear regression to account for the effect of the ambient temperature, 16 out of the 23 examined sites met the common model adequacy threshold of R2 > 0.8. After the transformation, 20 out of the 23 examined sites met the DQO of R2 > 0.7, as recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). A combined two-step statistical approach was also examined and revealed similar results. The methods described herein show that the CM data can be successfully transformed to meet DQOs for representative sites across Canada using year-round (both summer and winter) data. Implications: This study provides a transformation approach to correct ambient TEOM data against the federal reference method without dividing the ambient data according to warm and cold seasons. This transformation approach will significantly improve the correlation coefficient between TEOM and dichotomous air sampler data. It is possible that TEOM data at many Canadian locations can be transformed to meet the EPA data quality objective, thus making this transformation approach useful for comparisons of ambient PM data across jurisdictions.

[1]  K. Demerjian,et al.  New York State Urban and Rural Measurements of Continuous PM2.5 Mass by FDMS, TEOM, and BAM , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  W. Parkhurst,et al.  Chemical Composition of Fine Particles in the Tennessee Valley Region , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[3]  F. Lurmann,et al.  Evaluation of the TEOM method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas. , 1997, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  H Patashnick,et al.  Development of a Sample Equilibration System for the TEOM Continuous PM Monitor , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[5]  P. Scheff,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Adjustments of Multiple Continuous Monitoring Methods Produce Effective Characterization of Short-Term Fine Particulate Matter , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  Boštjan Gomišček,et al.  On the equivalence of gravimetric PM data with TEOM and beta-attenuation measurements , 2004 .

[7]  Delbert J. Eatough,et al.  Semi-volatile secondary organic aerosol in urban atmospheres: meeting a measurement challenge , 2003 .

[8]  M. Kleeman,et al.  Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used To Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[9]  J. Chow,et al.  Comparison of continuous and filter based mass measurements in Mexico City , 2003 .

[10]  Harvey Patashnick,et al.  Continuous PM-10 Measurements Using the Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance , 1990 .

[11]  John L. Gras,et al.  TEOM vs. manual gravimetric methods for determination of PM2.5 aerosol mass concentrations , 1999 .

[12]  Yushan Su,et al.  Improving the correlations of ambient tapered element oscillating microbalance PM2.5 data and SHARP 5030 Federal Equivalent Method in Ontario: A multiple linear regression analysis , 2014, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[13]  A. Robinson,et al.  Mass balance closure and the federal reference method for PM2.5 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania , 2004 .

[14]  P. Scheff,et al.  Adjusting Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance Data for Comparison with Federal Reference Method PM2.5 Measurements in Region 5 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.